Probably the channel is built more for high schoolers who do not have decent life experience.^ I need to stop this experiment prematurely because I'm not even 10 minutes in and I'm starting to get a headache (literarily).
This is the amount of garbage that he was able to spit out in 10 minutes:
- you are not responsible for your life and your problems, it's the economy that is doing it to you
- some people are very rich and apparently this is unfair and a problem for him personally
- he emphasized repeatedly that some people earn more money in a day than your yearly salary, which again is apparently a big problem for him
- brought gender pay gap into discussion, which has been thoroughly debunked in the past (has nothing to do with systemic discrimination, but rather the men's choices in regards to their work - longer hours, having kids later, working dangerous jobs etc.)
- "no employee will pay you more than the value you generate for the company" - if this was true the economy would skyrocket. Truth of the matter is that a large proportion of people do a shitty job and are actually overpaid. This is actually a huge problem for companies, because only a tiny fraction of competent people produce most of the value, the rest are slacking off. In a socialist system this problem gets exacerbated because there is no incentive to work hard.
- 0 sum mindset: "hiring people means exploiting them". No. Hiring people means empowering them. One worker can build a wood shack, 10 can build a house, 100 can build a school, 1000 can build a skyscraper. People can do amazing things when they collaborate together - there is nothing exploitative about this.
And this is just in one video, first 10 minutes.
What he promotes is not only an economic system, it's a life philosophy predicated on pure hatred, envy, dissatisfaction, learned helplessness, and a complete lack of personal responsibility.
Evil.
What scares me is the fact that he has 1.5M subscribers and a very high approval rating (likes/dislikes).
If business are exploiting workers unfairly why not everyone just start their own business. Pretty much one argument to end the debate. Why not just earn 10-100 times as the average person underservingly?
The origin of socialism welfare was to have relief for soldiers who come back from war, or for families whose men didn’t come back. That’s why we say citizens have “rights” but also “obligation”. But modern day weapons are so advanced that most country only needs a small pool of professional army. The world is largely at peace. We don’t need that kind of old social contract anymore. Any form of excessive social welfare become rights without obligations and are fundamentally unsustainable.
That’s why when socialist policies lasted for long, eventually the government went broke and a more right leaning reformist (Reagan, Thatcher) come to power.
There can be very good argument for government role in the economy. But the creator is not perceptive enough to know them. A lot of research in science and technology have more than 20 years of cycles before you can see meaningful return. Private enterprise simply are not interested in that kind of research that don’t see any return in the next 3-5 years at most. Most of the technology breakthrough are actually passed over from military research to civilian use, internet for example.
Another case is institutions and regulation. How do you know that the food you eat is safe? How do you know that your money in the bank account is not misappropriated? There are industry standards and checks in place. Without the framework there is lack of trust for any proper market functioning.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.