<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="member: 4862" data-quote="Kak" data-source="post: 1172230"
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
<a href="/community/goto/post?id=1172230"
class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
rel="nofollow"
data-xf-click="attribution"
data-content-selector="#post-1172230">Kak said:</a>
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
Haha I don’t know. I just saw that and because I’ve noticed a larger performance gain and lessened fatigue with rucking than running, I reposted it.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>Thought I'd ask Gemini to compre rucking and jogging:<br />
<br />
Rucking and jogging are both effective forms of exercise, but they differ significantly in their impact on the body, the muscle groups they target, and the overall type of workout they provide. Here's a detailed comparison:<br />
1. Definition and Movement:<br />
* Rucking: Involves walking with a weighted backpack, typically at a brisk pace. It's essentially an amplified form of walking, originating from military training. The weight can range from 5kg to 50kg or more, depending on fitness level and goals.<br />
* Jogging: Is a form of running at a slower, more sustained pace than sprinting. It involves propelling yourself forward at a speed faster than a brisk walk, with both feet often leaving the ground simultaneously.<br />
2. Joint Impact:<br />
* Rucking: Generally considered lower-impact than jogging. While the added weight increases the overall load on your joints compared to unweighted walking, the walking motion minimizes the repetitive pounding forces seen in jogging. This makes it a good option for individuals with joint concerns or those looking to minimize joint stress. The force load during rucking is often cited as 1.8 times body weight (compared to 5 times for running).<br />
* Jogging: Is a higher-impact activity. The repetitive ground strikes can place significant stress on joints, particularly the knees, hips, and ankles. However, it's important to note that studies suggest running itself doesn't necessarily cause osteoarthritis, and in fact, can even promote joint health by circulating synovial fluid and strengthening surrounding muscles, provided proper form and gradual progression are maintained.<br />
3. Muscle Engagement:<br />
* Rucking: Offers a more full-body workout due to the added weight. It significantly engages:<br />
* Legs: Quadriceps, hamstrings, glutes, and calves (especially when going uphill or downhill).<br />
* Core: Transversus abdominis and external obliques, which are crucial for stabilization.<br />
* Back: Traps, lats, and other back muscles to support and carry the load.<br />
* Shoulders: Also engaged in supporting the weighted pack.<br />
* Jogging: Primarily targets the lower body, focusing on:<br />
* Legs: Quadriceps, hamstrings, glutes, and calves, which are essential for propulsion and shock absorption.<br />
* Hip flexors: For lifting the legs.<br />
* Core: Plays a vital role in stabilizing the body and transferring power.<br />
* Upper body: While not the primary focus, the arms and shoulders contribute to rhythm and balance.<br />
4. Cardiovascular Benefits:<br />
* Both activities provide excellent cardiovascular benefits, increasing heart rate and improving oxygen uptake (VO2 max).<br />
* Rucking: Can place your body in an ideal fitness zone (around 60-70% of max heart rate) where fat oxidation is maximized.<br />
* Jogging: Is highly efficient at burning calories and improving heart and lung health, boosting endurance.<br />
5. Strength Building vs. Endurance:<br />
* Rucking: Blends cardiovascular exercise with resistance training. The added weight helps build strength, particularly in the legs, core, and back, while also improving muscular endurance.<br />
* Jogging: Primarily focuses on cardiovascular endurance and muscular endurance in the lower body. While it can build some leg strength, it's not as effective for overall muscle building as rucking.<br />
6. Calorie Burn:<br />
* Jogging: Generally burns more calories in a shorter amount of time due to its higher intensity.<br />
* Rucking: Burns significantly more calories than unweighted walking (often 2-4 times more) and can be comparable to jogging, depending on the weight carried and pace.<br />
7. Versatility and Accessibility:<br />
* Rucking: Can be done almost anywhere you can walk – on trails, city streets, or even indoors. It's also easy to do with friends, allowing for conversation.<br />
* Jogging: Also highly versatile, but often requires more attention to proper form and surface to minimize joint stress.<br />
8. Potential Drawbacks:<br />
* Rucking: Improper form or too much weight can lead to back pain or discomfort. It's crucial to start with a lighter weight and gradually increase it.<br />
* Jogging: Higher risk of overuse injuries, especially if training volume increases too quickly or with poor form.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
The "better" activity depends on your individual goals, fitness level, and joint health.<br />
* Choose Rucking if you:<br />
* Are looking for a low-impact, full-body workout.<br />
* Want to build strength and endurance simultaneously.<br />
* Have joint concerns or are recovering from injuries.<br />
* Enjoy outdoor activities and a more social pace.<br />
* Choose Jogging if you:<br />
* Prioritize calorie burn and improving cardiovascular fitness efficiently.<br />
* Are looking for a high-intensity workout.<br />
* Are already comfortable with higher-impact activities.<br />
Many people find benefit in incorporating both activities into their routine to reap the diverse benefits each offers.</div>
