The Entrepreneur Forum | Financial Freedom | Starting a Business | Motivation | Money | Success

Welcome to the only entrepreneur forum dedicated to building life-changing wealth.

Build a Fastlane business. Earn real financial freedom. Join free.

Join over 80,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.

Free registration at the forum removes this block.

Breakeven to £1,000/day overnight by NOT split-testing

Marketing, social media, advertising

Andy Black

Help people. Get paid. Help more people.
Staff member
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
370%
May 20, 2014
18,568
68,701
Ireland
Breakeven to £1,000/day overnight by NOT split-testing
(Originally posted on the inside here.)

We were running a pay-per-call campaign.

Here's a mockup of a page we were sending traffic to (substantially changed, but you get the idea):

tswEYiJ.png


People were searching for the marketing department.

Our ad said they'd be able to contact that marketing department in the headline.

The headline of the page said it was the number for the marketing department.

Yet not many people rang the number on the page.

We were running break-even.


Everyone in our team wanted to come up with different variations of the page including adding images, changing the colour and size of the phone icon, changing the headline, etc.

They wanted loads of landing page variations to split-test, and this would have resulted in loads of work for the design team and the development team.

Everyone talked about being a "data driven" company.

Except they weren't looking at the data.

They just wanted to throw traffic at each page, and "split-test".

Let the numbers decide, and we'll be "data driven".


Split-testing?

Data driven?

Meh...


Henry Ford once said that thinking was the hardest work there is, and that was why so few people do it.

It's easier to create many variations of a page and "let the traffic decide for us", than to look at the data we've already bought, come up with a theory of what is happening, and then come up with a test to prove or disprove the theory.

I didn't want to split-test. Instead, I spent the morning analysing the data we had.

I spotted that more people were ringing a number on the page that you got to when you clicked on this link:

UlF0aF2.png


When you clicked that link, you ended up on a page with three different numbers for three different departments within marketing.

Everyone seemed to be ringing the second number on that page.

We weren't driving traffic to that page, so people were ignoring the number on the page above, clicking the link on the right-hand menu, then scanning down and ringing the second number on the page.

My theory was that people didn't want to just ring "Marketing", but a specific section within Marketing.

...and that their eye was travelling over to the right hand menu, where they were scanning down.

So we swapped out the page and swapped in a different one to test my theory.

It looked like this (notice the different headline as well as swapping the columns):

pvnFNUT.png


We didn't "split-test" by creating a second page and splitting our traffic 50/50 between the pages to see which page "won".

We came up with a theory to explain what was happening, and created a new page that we believed would perform better.

So we just swapped it in, and sent ALL the traffic through the new page, and checked stats the next day.

Conversion rates shot up, and we were touching £1k a day profit ... overnight.


So how do I split-test?

I guess I don't really.

I analyse the data, come up with a theory about what is happening, then try and prove or disprove the theory.

I don't let Google's algorithm choose which of my ads is better, or which of my ads and landing pages has a better CPA.

If I did that then I wouldn't learn anything from the data that I'm buying.

The biggest benefit of paid search is the market intelligence that you buy. Don't let computer algorithms decide what is better for your business. Decide for yourself, and test to find out why.

Acting on one small insight can make a massive difference.

Computers don't get insights, you do.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

The-J

Dog Dad
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
264%
Aug 28, 2011
4,199
11,079
Ontario
I swear I've read this post before LOL

Still an awesome post
 

craig1928

Silver Contributor
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
163%
Jul 31, 2012
311
507
Dublin, Ireland
awesome Andy.

Just wondering, are you running pay-per-call through affiliate networks or do you get your own clients?
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Andy Black

Help people. Get paid. Help more people.
Staff member
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
370%
May 20, 2014
18,568
68,701
Ireland
Well done, Andy.
Thanks Jon.



I swear I've read this post before LOL

Still an awesome post

Yeah, it's in that thread I have on the inside. I thought I might as well share it on the outside as there's an important moral to the story.



awesome Andy.

Just wondering, are you running pay-per-call through affiliate networks or do you get your own clients?

Own clients. :)

For this particular client, I think we were actually running a pay-per-call campaign, but it was short-lived as too many others jumped onto it.



Will use this info today

Cool. Hope it helps!
 

Andy Black

Help people. Get paid. Help more people.
Staff member
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
370%
May 20, 2014
18,568
68,701
Ireland
Absolutely agreed that you have to THINK about your data. But, what about changes where "thinking" isn't going to provide a good answer for which will perform better...

For example, perhaps rearranging the Departments menu so that "Marketing" was at the top of the list...or the bottom of the list...or removed completely?

For companies with relatively small amounts of traffic, the changes that generate 50% increases in conversion are by-far the most important, but when you're driving a LOT of traffic to your site, those changes that drive 1-2% increased conversion/retention can add up quickly.

I worked for eBay for a while -- that company pioneered A/B in Silicon Valley. While they did a lot of things that I considered "in the noise," their ability to increase conversions/revenues quarter-over-quarter simply by split-testing dozens of UI changes every week (changes to small, segmented users to avoid any single user from seeing too many changes) was amazing.

Most importantly, many of the changes that split-tested well wouldn't have been obvious just by using common sense or thinking about them.
Yes, totally agree that IT and brute force can help, especially if directed by someone with a marketing/sales brain.

If you do that AND figure out the reason *why* results differ, then you're streets ahead of the competition.

In my mind (said as a recovering data dude), street smart beats data scientist.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Post New Topic

Please SEARCH before posting.
Please select the BEST category.

Post new topic

Guest post submissions offered HERE.

Latest Posts

New Topics

Fastlane Insiders

View the forum AD FREE.
Private, unindexed content
Detailed process/execution threads
Ideas needing execution, more!

Join Fastlane Insiders.

Top