Sorry, but that list is in alphabetical order!
Yeah, I screwed that up so bad I went in to hiding. I even checked the first 3 movies listed, and they were in descending order, so I assume they all were in order.
The closest I can come to redeeming myself is to look at the movies again, and I do see one thing worth mentioning. In the Top 10 grossing movies, only #9 and #10 mention a specific hero's name in the title:
1 1 Avatar $2,787,965,087 2009 [# 1][# 2]
2 1 Titanic $2,187,463,944 1997 [# 3][# 4]
3 3 Star Wars: The Force Awakens $2,068,223,624 2015 [# 5][# 6]
4 4 Avengers: Infinity War film currently playing $2,048,359,754 2018 [# 7][# 8]
5 3 Jurassic World $1,671,713,208 2015 [# 9][# 10]
6 3 The Avengers $1,518,812,988 2012 [# 11][# 12]
7 4 Furious 7 $1,516,045,911 2015 [# 13][# 14]
8 5 Avengers: Age of Ultron $1,405,403,694 2015 [# 15][# 14]
9 9
Black Panther $1,346,913,161 2018 [# 16][# 17]
10 3
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 $1,341,511,219 2011 [# 18][# 19]
But in 5 of the worst 10 money losers, including the 3 absolute worst, a specific hero's name is mentioned in the title:
10. The Adventures of
Pluto Nash, Production budget: $100 million | Loss: $96 million
9. Stealth, Production budget: $135 million | Loss: $96 million
8. 47 Ronin, Production budget: $175 million | Loss: $98 million
7.
The Lone Ranger, Production budget: $225 million | Loss: $98 million
6. Titan AE, Production budget: $90 million | Loss: $100 million
5. Mars Needs Moms, Production budget: $150 million | Loss: $100 million
4. Monster Trucks, Production budget: $125 million | Loss: $115 million
3.
John Carter, Production budget: $263 million | Loss: $122 million
2.
Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas, Production budget: $60 million | Loss: $125 million
1.
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, Production budget: $175 million | Loss: $150 million
I don't know if that is an actual thing or not, but it makes sense that movie goers may decide they don't care about a specific hero, and so skip the whole movie. It makes it easy to say "No" to the movie. Maybe they could do split testing and try two different names, such as "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword" vs "The Legendary Swordsman".
At least one of the worst movies did in fact have "The Adventures of..." in the name, and none of the highest grossing did, lol.
Sources:
The ten most expensive movie flops of all time
List of highest-grossing films - Wikipedia
Bonus point for anyone who saw the two worst movies are named "<Hero>: Legend of the...", but I wasn't going to stick my neck out again.