The only issue I see with this is:
Sure it will now pass the GPT 2 tool, but will it pass Google?
Reason I bring this up is, I've been doing "SEO" since before Google existed, manipulating the Yahoo Directory and DMOZ.
I've created a rephraser myself, and used MANY back in the day.
Granted this was a while ago, but I've used recent ones too ( Jarvis, Copy.ai, etc ) and pretty much anyone that uses them see's some kind of penalty in indexing or ranking after a while. I've collected a lot of this info personally and over at another forum ( BuilderSoceity ).
While I agree you need to "hand edit" and "rewrite it" once out of the phraser/rewriter/AI machine.. I don't want people to get the wrong idea and skip over that important past ( like you pointed out ) because if they ChatGPT and then use a rephraser tool.... and not hand edit it, they gonna still get hit by something like Google later on.
The "what ifs" are endless, so I guess it's up to each individual to assess their own risk.
I wouldn't recommend it for someone running a blog, or anything with articles as the primary "product." If your site is based on articles, then keep writing as you always have.
Or you could generate an article and simply rewrite it, completely by hand. That's going to be as safe as writing it yourself. Basically, the AI generated one is just an original cheat sheet to base your article on, and flesh it out.
If your site is based on something else, and you're only publishing content as a sparse secondary element, to provide additional info to your customers or users, then it might be fine. As long as you rephrase it and manually edit it to have a natural language and flow.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.