Now I see where the confusion is. In technical analysis, every period gets drawn with a new type of marker. And then the period's activity gets illustrated within each of these markers. The marker could be a line, a bar, and something that's called a candlestick and there's a few others. Now these markers can get broken down into larger and smaller time segments or other quantifiable segments. They can be broken down to single minutes or other small scales and greater like days, weeks, months, years etc. .
In the internet based charting I used with btc, the daily marker ended (closed) at 6:59 est and the new marker began (opened) at 7pm. These markers when combined together tell a story. My call from 2 days ago was based on this. Fundamentalists and technicians most times seems to disagree on each other's way, but there's designations for both.
Actually I said to watch for 14,000 and the relation to it (based on the daily marker as that's usually how these are discussed). And I use "ish" "14,000ish" because to hit an exact on the dot isn't ever going to be a constant thing. I then followed up with 12,000ish and 11,5 was hit. I was looking at this as a 'thereafter' but the volatility is huge in btc and it didn't want to wait a day! It happens all the time and I don't watch this thing religiously.
Regardless, I was just trying to help out by sharing how I read it. Nothing more nothing less. It's Christmas time and I thought I was doing a good deed here. But emotions do run high when value and volatility meet. So my apologies go out to anyone I offended.
FWIW, it is still in an uptrend. And I'd be more than happy to say when I see a confirmation in trend change, if anyone's interested that is. Otherwise, there's too much emotion running in this for me and I've got other things on my plate. I'm stepping out of this thread guys. Again, was just trying to help. And my calls were based on very specific things that are universal amongst anything that can be gauged with markers.
Happy Holidays folks!