I'll just ignore the typical ad hominems and pile-on bits. Unfortunately it happens at all internet communities (although this one is the least so far, except the crypto threads). Those intolerable of criticism, cynicism and questioning the party line like that merely warn others about the nature of their advice. It doesn't bother me, and I'll never keep my mouth shut when I think an idea needs interrogating, no matter who or how many people rage at it. What is the nature of declaring the truth and then going ad hominem at anyone who dares question it?
Re: real-world advice: I already gave a form of advice on this topic: the set of questions I put in #23, which someone struggling (or someone who wants to help them) could use to analyze their situation.
The power law I keep mentioning is derived from real world business attempts, successes and failures. The power law is absolutely critical for people to understand, because it's truly fundamental, especially to a former student/employee (which follows more linear return curves). Proceeding in business without understanding what "1 in 10 businesses make it" actually means and what the repercussions of that are, is part of the reason so few people make it. That doesn't mean they shouldn't go into business, but they should do so informed by it.
Here are some tips I would give to a seriously struggling person, without any other information about them:
* The primary reason you hear about guys who pull that off is because it's such an incredible, low-odds achievement. You'll never hear about the 100 guys who tried just as hard as him and ended up ruined, but you'll hear dozens of voices who falsely accuse those who bring up that fact of "just giving up" or "not wanting it enough" or "thinking it's all just luck", for their bravado pleasure.
** Everyone also wants to have no employees: it's just a website in a box somewhere. Aim only for that, and read about the 1 in 100 who pulled that off, and you're reducing your chances of getting rich completely unnecessarily.
Re: real-world advice: I already gave a form of advice on this topic: the set of questions I put in #23, which someone struggling (or someone who wants to help them) could use to analyze their situation.
The power law I keep mentioning is derived from real world business attempts, successes and failures. The power law is absolutely critical for people to understand, because it's truly fundamental, especially to a former student/employee (which follows more linear return curves). Proceeding in business without understanding what "1 in 10 businesses make it" actually means and what the repercussions of that are, is part of the reason so few people make it. That doesn't mean they shouldn't go into business, but they should do so informed by it.
Here are some tips I would give to a seriously struggling person, without any other information about them:
- If you have no capital, trying to jump the huge gap from employer to customers is foolish. If you are unemployed, it's even more foolish*. You should start with clients first. Salary/wage -> Fees -> Profits. Contracting offers much more room to modify your active/passive income-targeting work balance. It also teaches you much of the new areas you'll need to know for passive income business: marketing, managing finances, outsourcing work, legal stuff, etc.
- Therefore, first and foremost you need to work on your marketable skill. You need to work on having that skill, being known to have that skill, and being able to get clients needing your work in that skill. As long as you can get clients, you can pay bills (and without going back to a job), no matter what happens to your passive-income pursuits.
- The more specific your skill, the better. Being a generalist causes more stress, lower ability to differentiate, more difficulty in increasing your skills, and as a result: lower effective hourly rate. It's basically contrary to the sociological principle of division of labour. You always want to aim to be the best at some narrow thing that has demand; but recognize you'll have to start more general until you discover and hone in on that best specific.
- Minimize your living costs, beyond what you even think you need to. Right down to the bare minimum. Smaller / more remote apartment, less eating out, no luxuries. Your ability to pursue passive income business (or build up your contracting), is dependent on one primary thing: work hours you can manage at $0 pay. Part of that is mindset, part of that is your living costs and client income (or savings), and part of it is obtaining good solid procedural advice from good sources in the area you're targeting (so you don't spin your wheels).
- Recognizing that business, especially product-based (passive), follows a power law curve:
- It is better to have partners than try to do it yourself. Sure, everyone wants to be a sole proprietor, 100% equity, no chance of disputes, lack of control, or other problems that can come with partners **. But observe what percent of the big names started with no partners. Google, Facebook, PayPal, Apple, Oracle, Microsoft. Dividends divide linearly across partners, but exponentially against the market. 200 units of work per month in a single business is far more effective for market return than 100 + 100 units across two businesses.
- Always focus on one thing at a time. Never, ever, spread yourself out (you can spread capital, labour out later when you have it). Complete and ship one thing, before going on to the next one. The only exception to this is "orthogonal work": different work exhausts you in different ways, so it may be that having a 2nd different type of project concurrently allows you to work more in total.
- Expect to execute 10 concepts to get a 50% chance of winning. Look at a graph of a power-law curve, and imagine your products randomly scattering around it. Each concept must be fully researched, tested if possible, and executed fully; and you must still expect that to just be a dice roll and have another concept ready to move on to next. You should factor this into your time horizons, work estimates, psychological preparation, and how much time/capital you invest in each play.
- Be very careful of the target market (applies both to client & customer work). If the type of customer in a market is cheap / has little money, or the customer base is so small and the supply is ample already, it can be very hard to see it until you're 5 or more products in. You should research the target market 10 times more than you research a product idea you bring to it. Not just what they want: but how many of them there are, and especially: how much they're ready to pay. Looking for signs of cheapness, not respecting how much a type of work/service costs, evidence of good products/suppliers or skilled contractors disappearing, etc. The more cheapness there appears to be in a market, the larger it must be and the larger you must be (in capacity, economies of scale etc); always aim for higher margins.
- You can bypass a lot of these problems with capital. If you can buy an existing business, you've just bypassed the business survival rate. Discovering and buying a well valued business "fixer upper" is an easier way of succeeding than a start-up -- simply because it's already making profit, so it's yours to screw up, rather than grinding away at making a breakthrough (you can also help buy it with bank financing against its existing assets). Freelancer.com had its origin like this. You can also use the capital to spray it over the power-law curve, looking for something that grips (same principle as venture capitalists).
* The primary reason you hear about guys who pull that off is because it's such an incredible, low-odds achievement. You'll never hear about the 100 guys who tried just as hard as him and ended up ruined, but you'll hear dozens of voices who falsely accuse those who bring up that fact of "just giving up" or "not wanting it enough" or "thinking it's all just luck", for their bravado pleasure.
** Everyone also wants to have no employees: it's just a website in a box somewhere. Aim only for that, and read about the 1 in 100 who pulled that off, and you're reducing your chances of getting rich completely unnecessarily.