User Power
Value/Post Ratio
161%
- Jun 3, 2015
- 2,075
- 3,335
I vote this most interesting thread of the month
Seconded.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Join over 90,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.
Free registration at the forum removes this block.I vote this most interesting thread of the month
That makes more sense than the billion percent returns it was forecasting.
So do you find the income amounts on this page to be accurate: Realtime mining hardware profitability | ASIC Miner Value
It projects ~$100 per day at current prices for the A9 ZMaster.
Great thread. I think I can already guess why you chose Estonia, I've been thinking of becoming an e-citizen of them for awhile now.
Hash rates are different for different algorithms. Many "coins" do not allow ASIC's to process their data based on how the algorithm is built (ETH being the one you looked at I presume).So pretend I'm a newbie here (not a stretch of the imagination at all).
I see this miner: ASICMiner 48Th/s, Silent Water Cooling, Built-in PSU | ASICminer Company.
The stats say it has a hash rate of 48TH/s, using 3900W
I go to this website mentioned earlier: Mining Calculator Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dash and Monero
If I plug in 48 TH/s, and the 3900W the miner says it takes, the calculator tells me I'll make roughly half a billion dollars a year.
What critical piece of information am I missing?
This is excellent information.Hash rates are different for different algorithms. Many "coins" do not allow ASIC's to process their data based on how the algorithm is built (ETH being the one you looked at I presume).
ASIC's inherently have much faster hash rates due to being built specifically for an algorithm. BTC allows ASIC mining as well as many other coins. Increased hash rate on network = increased difficulty = less profits/hash rate. This is why GPU mining on BTC is inefficient as the rest of the network is powered by ASIC farms.
Non-ASIC algorithms typically rely on GPU processing power.
On June 19th, one of the financial publications ran an article on their front page (online publication, not print) about how our company failed to file our tax report and how we were taking advantage of the Estonian e-residency program.
What makes it bad is they named both me and my business partner personally in the article and went further to suggest that anyone doing business with us should demand payment upfront since according to the author of the article, we are not credit worthy.
This is f***** up. "Journalism" at its worst. How did they get access to this data? Is this publicly available?
In Estonia, all company information is publicly available.
As I said, I doubt we will see the money, but they needed a stern warning. They intentionally did this believing we would not see the article.
So today I called again and no one knows the status on our shipment being released from customs because the agent dealing with it went on vacation.....
LOL. Estonian efficiency my a$$.
Tomorrow I'm going to meet with the electrician and contractor at the building to finalize the details. Then the next day I'm going to the customs office in person and hopefully walking away with my miners.
No. You don't bribe in Estonia. They are rule followers to a T.Is this just a ruse to get a bribe? (I know this is illegal for American business owners to do while abroad)
In Vietnam they pull this crap all the time. Nothing involving the government gets done quickly without some tea money. Not sure how corrupt Estonia currently is, but I do know it was part of the USSR.
For the first two machines you have up and running, are you actually getting near consistent 50Ksol/s as advertised?
I only ask because what I've read, some of the miners are reporting much lower hashrates than that. 30-35, some lower.
It really seems like Innosilicon has been trying to flood the market as quickly as possible, thus offering a 2 for 1 buy-in which case it would seem that within a few months, the ability to profit would be considerably lower. This is my biggest concern as I just don't know how long this can be sustained re: profit calculations with more hands in the fire after Sept shipments.
Do you think that Zencash or Zcash might 'hard fork' thus causing the A9's to become obsolete overnite, like a few others?
These ASIC's seem like the way to go, but I'm just wondering if it is too late for a solo miner to profit or just break even.
That spreadsheet looks mighty attractive. $6000 / mo out within a few months!? Wow. That's with 12 Z9's, so you'd have an initial outlay of $24k plus any additional infrastructure.
But the thing that's always stopped me is... don't these miners have a very limited lifespan? Doesn't the problem difficulty increase so fast that a miner is basically obsolete within a few months? How much of a productive lifespan do you get before the miner chews up more power than it's worth? I got the impression the miner value tended to go to zero just about the time it paid itself off, so you're always on a hamster-wheel of trying to squeeze out profits before the miner loses its punch.
But I don't see any ongoing miner-upgrade costs in your spreadsheet. So you're planning to run the miners for months, producing a more or less constant income??
Also, do you have a preferred mining pool for these machines?
With the new mine, I 'MAY' take investors, but not right now. And 'IF' I take investors, I am only taking money in larger sums. I am not interested in having a lot of small investors.
That's what I'd like to understand too. Honestly I've never understood the emphasis on power. It makes a difference, yes, but it's a relatively small factor. Definitely smaller than major infrastructure investments. One Z9 would make something around $400+/mo with my $0.12 power. If I had completely FREE power it would only add about 6% to the net, about $425. Which is good, but it doesn't look like a make-or-break difference. If I was looking at "mini-mine in my basement at $0.12 vs. setting up a facility next to a hydro dam for $0.04" or something like that, the setup costs would be much worse than the pricier power at home unless you go REAL big.Very interesting thread. So without foreign tax benefits, and avg price per kilowatt in the US, this would essentially be a waste of time in the contiguous?
One Z9 mini consumes 300W. That's just 3 100W light bulbs. It would be about 300W/110V = 2.7 amps, so you could very comfortably run the 12 Z9's in your spreadsheet on two ordinary (US) household 110V/20A circuits, or presumably two 220V/10A Euro circuits. (And you'd have a 3600W heater in the basement.) I have some 30A runs in my basement, and I could very easily run 220V down there, so I'm not concerned about that.So basically, you can plug in a couple of machines in your basement and hope your wiring doesn't fry and catch your house on fire (actually a real risk), or invest several hundred thousand or more. There's no middle ground.
Dude. I'm 61. I hit the "too lazy" point a long time ago. LOL But I would love to have a farm of these little beasties spitting out coins.But I can tell you this. I am 44 years old, my business partner is 50. If we get anywhere close to our model of profitability, I may find out I am too lazy to grow the mine any larger.
Great charts! Where did you find these?Okay, the price looks a lot like the profitability, which I think leads a lot of people to the conclusion that you might as well just invest in the coin and skip the whole mining thing altogether. But after reviewing the above charts, I think that might be an oversimplification. The biggest eye opener for me is that the profitability chart is not simply an inverse of the difficulty chart.
Yes. Monthly increases/decreases don't add up -- they multiply. That's how you figure compound interest, for example. So e.g. 4 months of a 10%/month increase would be (10% increase)^4 or (1+0.10)^4 = 1.464 = 46.4% increase. If you have a 20% increase in 3 months, that's 1.20^(1/3) = 1.0627 = 6.27% increase per month. 1.0627^3 = 1.0627 * 1.0627 * 1.0627 = 1.20 = 20% increase. (X^Y is X to the Yth power, e.g. X^3 is X cubed. X^(1/Y) is the Yth root of X.)Thank you @garyfritz, that 9% depreciation figure is essentially what I've been after myself but I couldn't connect the dots. Would you mind elaborating a little more on how you got to 9% exactly? I assume it's based on the average (3x) trend?
Very interesting thread. So without foreign tax benefits, and avg price per kilowatt in the US, this would essentially be a waste of time in the contiguous?
Not being cynical here, just ran some preliminary numbers and they don't back out like yours. I should also note, that I know nothing about mining anything other than gold.
I'm surprised no one is making earth sheltered greenhouses and lining these things up with geothermal cooling. It seems like it would be hard to control temperatures as a mining operation increases exponentially, without eating into the profits. Could get interesting though if you're able to harness the earth's constant temperature for free, independent of outside climate.
Join Fastlane Insiders.