Ok, I've been thinking about this for a while, but just can't reconcile some things here. First let me make sure I got the original FastLane story more or less right. MJ was a limousine driver and had several clients ask if he knew where to find a limo in other cities. Based on this, he built a site for people to find/reserve limos across the US. Unless I'm misremembering, he did not first make a "landing page" or anything like that to gauge demand, he just went ahead and built the site based on the hunch that it's a thing people needed. I'm completely ignoring existing competition and outexecuting them here, I only want to discuss validation.
So this is the problem I face. My skillset happens to be computers, including "making websites". From what I gather most people here are interested in businesses that don't revolve around pure information products, where their web site is just a storefront or lead generator for a product that's otherwise offline. I've had several people on this forum chide me for wanting to just jump in and spend 2-3 months building an initial product without any more validation than knowing a few people would want the thing I'm making - but unless I got it entirely wrong, this is exactly what MJ did!
Consider another example, Facebook. How could you validate that concept with a landing page? Much worse, what if Mark Zuckerberg had tried the landing page approach and people didn't understand what he was even talking about? What if they said "well there's already MySpace, you shouldn't even bother". Seems the downside of the 20-minute landing page validation is you may get it wrong and throw out what could be a great business. The examples I've seen always seem to be about a company that spent years laboring on a product that no one wanted, I guess because the people who made the other error (throwing out an idea too early) never realize the mistake they made, unless someone else later happens to do the exact same thing and that person finds out and writes about it.
Seems to me that websites where the site itself is the thing are hard to explain, to the point that people will be unable to evaluate your idea until you actually have the site, at least a very early ugly prototype form of it that implements the basic idea. You can still control your risk by setting hard deadlines and goals from the start - in 2 months, 3 months, the site must implement at least x, y, and z, or work on it stops and the original assumptions are evaluated. Only after you have a very basic site do you start using that to validate, and based on these very first users, decide what to do.
What I've described above is what people in the internet startup community do, and in fact the current crop of tools are aimed at bringing up sites as fast as possible (wordpress of course being one of them, but there are many more for people who are developers). I'm trying to reconcile this world (again, what MJ did) with what I read on this forum, which seems to be primarily geared toward people selling physical products. Remember MJ said flipping a company was fastlane, it's perfectly fine to never make a penny of revenue if you sell the whole mess for a pile of cash to someone who believes they can monetize it.
So this is the problem I face. My skillset happens to be computers, including "making websites". From what I gather most people here are interested in businesses that don't revolve around pure information products, where their web site is just a storefront or lead generator for a product that's otherwise offline. I've had several people on this forum chide me for wanting to just jump in and spend 2-3 months building an initial product without any more validation than knowing a few people would want the thing I'm making - but unless I got it entirely wrong, this is exactly what MJ did!
Consider another example, Facebook. How could you validate that concept with a landing page? Much worse, what if Mark Zuckerberg had tried the landing page approach and people didn't understand what he was even talking about? What if they said "well there's already MySpace, you shouldn't even bother". Seems the downside of the 20-minute landing page validation is you may get it wrong and throw out what could be a great business. The examples I've seen always seem to be about a company that spent years laboring on a product that no one wanted, I guess because the people who made the other error (throwing out an idea too early) never realize the mistake they made, unless someone else later happens to do the exact same thing and that person finds out and writes about it.
Seems to me that websites where the site itself is the thing are hard to explain, to the point that people will be unable to evaluate your idea until you actually have the site, at least a very early ugly prototype form of it that implements the basic idea. You can still control your risk by setting hard deadlines and goals from the start - in 2 months, 3 months, the site must implement at least x, y, and z, or work on it stops and the original assumptions are evaluated. Only after you have a very basic site do you start using that to validate, and based on these very first users, decide what to do.
What I've described above is what people in the internet startup community do, and in fact the current crop of tools are aimed at bringing up sites as fast as possible (wordpress of course being one of them, but there are many more for people who are developers). I'm trying to reconcile this world (again, what MJ did) with what I read on this forum, which seems to be primarily geared toward people selling physical products. Remember MJ said flipping a company was fastlane, it's perfectly fine to never make a penny of revenue if you sell the whole mess for a pile of cash to someone who believes they can monetize it.
Dislike ads? Become a Fastlane member:
Subscribe today and surround yourself with winners and millionaire mentors, not those broke friends who only want to drink beer and play video games. :-)
Access Restricted: Unlock 1,000,000+ Posts
Stop Peeking Through the Keyhole.
Open the Door.
You hit a wall because the best advice isn't free—it's earned. Since 2007, MJ DeMarco has been active here daily (99.9% active rate), building a war room for entrepreneurs who refuse to settle for mediocrity.
- Active Daily: Life-changing content posted dozens of times every day. No dead threads.
- MJ's Inner Circle: Direct access to the author of The Millionaire Fastlane.
- Vetted Network: Connect with founders scaling to 7 and 8 figures.
- Proven Roadmaps: Strategy over motivation. Execution over "hustle porn."
"SCALED TO 6-FIGURE MONTHS"
"Tips and advice here saved me from huge mistakes, others allowed me to scale my business to 6-figure months."— User MitchC
"INSANE QUALITY OF PEOPLE"
"The number of high quality people I've met from this forum has been insane. All of it predicated on building real value."— User Richard Peck
"You are the average of the five people you surround yourself with."
Are you surrounding yourself with success?
