User Power
Value/Post Ratio
605%
- Oct 16, 2014
- 801
- 4,843
You are not wrong, just not specific enough. It’s like saying that the internet TC/IP will crash - it didn’t and it won’t. But take NFTs “collectables etc” for example, they are indeed like the dot com companies - 98% no value at all. There was this one little company, Amazon something… but the rest, we all know the story.
@GIlman - your posts on medical research were stellar. It’s your domain, well researched and much appreciated. To return the favor, allow me to just say that throwing all Crypto into “dot com” is a mistake. Infrastructure that allows NFTs to be built isn’t going anywhere. 98% of no added value projects will burn to the ground after masses start “investing”.
Actually, I agree with you fully that both NFT’s and blockchain technology have a very bright future, they solve some problems elegantly.
My point was simply that the crypto/NFT markets seems wildly and spectacularly hyped and completely irrational at the moment, and that there is huge danger with heavy investment here right now.
I think there will be a time, just like with the internet…after the crash and many thing burn down…after people lose faith in the future of crypto and NFT…to place some bets in the survivors who can develop strong use cases.
Predicting who will survive now is nearly impossible. No one imagined Amazon would become what it has. How could anyone know a bookseller would be better than pets.com. In hindsight yes, but living through it real-time no.
That’s the reason for my comparison to early internet/dot com crash. It seems to me we are in the early hype phase, and I expect similar dynamics to play out as during what we saw for the early internet. There were lots of dot com paper millionaires HODLing stock in tech startups that lost it all when the whole thing blew up.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Last edited: