Will we see an actual war with China?

[ygtrhos]

You're German commenting on American politics. Why do people do this?

Bullshit argument. US has been all over the world and in US everybody comments about Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam without knowing a damn thing about these countries really.

Anybody can comment on anything, it is your job to assess if it is worth listening or not.

Someone can come from Bhutan, Turkey or Germany and comment on US. That is the price you pay for having speech freedom and democracy. It is not only you, but everyone, who can comment.

So stop quieting others and get back to your own business.

@Andreas Thiel There is no justifiable reason for a world war in 2020. Historically, it has been proven that even winning a war like that would be hugely detrimental to the winner. (Remember UK after World War 2. The only winners of WW2 are US and Soviet Union.)

Oil prices, geopolitical concerns, these things are small when you compare them with long-term debt cycles and world dominance. They are not worth a world war.

If US declares war on China, that would be one of the dumbest things they can do. Even if they win that war, they would be going back 20 years in time because of the destruction that the war causes. Probably the ones who would win such a war would be Iran, Russia and EU.

 

[100ToOne]

Forget China vs USA, after reading the replies in this thread it seems the war is going to be Germany vs USA.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[Odysseus M Jones]

Forget China vs USA, after reading the replies in this thread it seems the war is going to be Germany vs USA.

I hope they settle it with a soccer match, women's of course, or maybe the US women's team against the German men's team.
The US women's team kick butt.

Changed my mind, all women.
It is customary to exchange shirts at the end of the game.

Much better than an exchange of nuclear strikes.

 

[AgainstAllOdds]

The feedback I have is the West is pushing for compensation for releasing the virus, but no war.
Are your friends in the mainland?

Yup.

Chinese generals have stated that nothing's off the table if they keep getting accused of corona. Implied threat is war.

 

[Odysseus M Jones]

Yup.

Chinese generals have stated that nothing's off the table if they keep getting accused of corona. Implied threat is war.

It could be, but nothing is ever off the table with Chinese, they are epicureans, that's what got us into this mess.

I just said this because I defend and I think it makes sense that everyone who wants to talk about this, should do it, regardless of the fact that it is European, Chinese, American, South American, or Russian.

But a war with China affects the whole world. So it's everyone's business

Ordinarily I'd agree, but this forum doesn't want politics or religion discussed.

And the way the OP framed this reeks of politics. It won't be long before terms like "libtard" appear on the thread.

But if we confine it to economics & business we'll be ok

 

[AFMKelvin]

TLDR you're acting as if TMF forum is some exclusive American cool club, it's not.

No just that members keep their politics to their own countries.

[QUOTE="jpn, post: 876345, member:
Having said that, the OP isn't talking about what the average US citizen thinks. He's asking if there could be war between the US and China. This has nothing to do with what the average US citizen thinks about war right now.
[/QUOTE]

Asking about war I a public forum not asking about the opinion about war of the average citizen. Which one is it.

 

[Odysseus M Jones]

Are you guys taking the piss?

That's Japan
Although like the Chinese it's for the reputed health benefits

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[AFMKelvin]

German soldiers have served and died in both Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001, neither of which were 'German' wars/politics. A potential conflict between US and China would directly affect the German economy.

Again, you counter your own point.

OP should discuss whatever he wishes, as long as he's within forum rules.

It's ironic that you bash the MSM but are so eager to thought police others on an internet forum. Hilarious.

How is asking others to keep politics to their own countries thought police? I'll believe a German speaking on German issues over an American speaking on German issues.

 

[Fenom21]

How is asking others to keep politics to their own countries thought police? I'll believe a German speaking on German issues over an American speaking on German issues.

You're acting as though a US/China war is not a global topic, but simply American politics. Very strange.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[bornoim]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but there has never been a direct conflict between nuclear powers, right? So why should this change all of a sudden?

Even if the US actually had the potential to win a war against China and neutralize their nuclear weapons, Russia would interfere because they would know they're next in line.

So yeah, I don't lose sleep over this.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[AFMKelvin]

Yes, I agree when it comes US internal affairs. I especially cringe when non Americans talk about things like enforcing gun control and race relations in the US.

But a potential conflict between the world's 2 main superpowers is not exclusively an American issue. It is very strange that you think so. I feel like I'm explaining 2+2 to a 5 year old.

How much were other countries effected by the Cuba/North Korea/Venezuela embargo? As far as I know other countries still trade with those three. Yet the USA doesn't trade with them. An all out war wouldn't make a big difference for them either.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[AFMKelvin]

I am sensing a complex of superiority, not an "international issue Vs national issue" here (international vs national is 2+2 = 4, as someone said).

No all I'm saying is that whatever the original poster wanted to know is not even in our minds in the USA. People are too worried about Covid19 to even think about war.

 

[Noo]

No all I'm saying is that whatever the original poster wanted to know is not even in our minds in the USA. People are too worried about Covid19 to even think about war.

Okay, I understand that.

I was trying to get myself away from the topic itself and only talking about the whereabouts, but there is this article on Forbes, written by a commenter, that is interesting.

Basically it kinda links what people think, with its impact on the elections, and international policy at the same time.

From my interpretation reading this article, the key point here is that Trump can lose swing states if unemployment continues as it is, allied with the fact that the fighting against coronavirus isn't going very well in comparison with China, continuing to attack China probably won't work/won't be enough to redirect the attention of his key voters.

Trump’s Attack On China Could Ruin His Re-Election Bid

By focusing his attack on China, Trump may have inadvertently provided clear evidence of his failure in making America great again.

www.forbes.com

And it seems to be a "nice guy" to comment this (studied public policy, it's Asian but lived in North America a couple of years as well). It would be better if it was Chinese, though. I guess it's from Singapore. But it's still very good.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/yuwahedrickwong/?originalSubdomain=ca

 

[bornoim]

We are now in an alternate reality in which Western Europe is a dystopia, the USA is about to go on a rampage against everyone because nuclear holocausts raise the GDP, and Putin gets himself wrecked by NATO to save his beloved China.

Russia is already intimidated by the US missile defense system as it is, and if the balance of power were to shift too much in favor of the US, an alliance between China and Russia would be the logical consequence.
I don't know what your problem is though, the scenario you quoted was purely hypothetical in order to show that the probability of a war is close to zero.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[MitchM]

I’m of a mind that both the U.S. and China having nuclear capability is enough to stave off a war. I really hope that mutually assured destruction will hold us back.

As far as I see it, if terms can be met between both the US and China that are economically beneficial for both, then we will continue being fine. Almost every single alternative is better than war and will likely stay that way.

 

[Odysseus M Jones]

China is touting itself as being "socialist, with capitalist leanings", phrase that I made up,

I believe Deng Xiaoping said "socialism with Chinese characteristics" back in the 80's

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0835115534/?tag=tff-amazonparser-20

 

[Ben Taylor]

I feel like all one needs to do is watch War Games, with China subbed in for Russia, to see why a hot war with China is extremely unlikely. Mutually assured destruction, people.

 

[WJK]

Hi all.

We are in the middle of a trade war. Does anybody think we will see an actual war with China?

Given the issues in the oil sector, I thought a war with Iran is likely. That might "solve" the problem of low prices.

But what about Brzezinski and the grand chessboard? How else could China be subdued economically?
As far as I know, think tanks have determined that a war with China must happen soon, before China gets too powerful.

China media calls for nukes to be TRIPLED to fend off US amid virus backlash

CHINESE state media has called for a tripling of nation’s nuclear arsenal to fend off the “warmongering” US as tensions rage over the coronavirus pandemic. The Global Times ̵…

www.thesun.co.uk

War has historically been great for GDP growth. Presidents get reelected if they are in a war.

The USA is practising nuklear strikes.

US Nukes Russia in Simulation Exercise

US Nukes Russia in Simulation Exercise

www.nationaldefensemagazine.org

World War 3 threat: US warned after ‘dangerous’ nuclear simulation

A SIMULATION of a nuclear attack on Russia by the United States is upping the stakes and making an apocalyptic showdown between the superpowers more likely, a senior Russian politician has claimed.

www.express.co.uk

The economic sactions that Trump considered recently sound pretty close to something that usually leads to military conflicts.

Has this been discussed here, already? I did a search, but mostly found this rant RANT - China is our #1 enemy and what to do about it which does not mention the war option, but shows a sentiment that politicians can tap into ... as well as trade war related threads.

It could happen. A lot of it depends on who wins the November election. And it's not just Trump -- it's Congress as well. And I don't think that the USA will shoot first. China is going to get a lot more desperate to save face as time goes on. This dispute is going to more and more upfront and center.

I don't think that the Chinese want to get into a hot war. They would rather win financially and by theft. But, look at what's happened in the last 3 years. Many in the world have turned against China. Before they were flying under the radar without close scrutiny. Now a lot of the world is angry with them. It's been a work in progress. The trade war issues started it and the virus has cemented many people's feelings of disgust for China's decisions.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[advantagecp]

Anybody can comment on anything, it is your job to assess if it is worth listening or not.

Someone can come from Bhutan, Turkey or Germany and comment on US. That is the price you pay for having speech freedom and democracy. It is not only you, but everyone, who can comment.

This American gets tired of hearing foreigners constant criticism of all things American because it's real easy to say what should have been done after the fact or when you are sitting in the peanut gallery. It's what we called "leading from the rear" in the US Marine Corps. When you find yourself up in front with the responsibility for making decisions suddenly shit gets a lot more complicated.

So let's say you are German and you are offering your comment on how the US should have done something differently. My question is what the f*** did Germany do?

 

[AFMKelvin]

Bullshit argument. US has been all over the world and in US everybody comments about Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam without knowing a damn thing about these countries really.

Anybody can comment on anything, it is your job to assess if it is worth listening or not.

Someone can come from Bhutan, Turkey or Germany and comment on US. That is the price you pay for having speech freedom and democracy. It is not only you, but everyone, who can comment.

So stop quieting others and get back to your own business.

Trust me no one in the USA comments on other countries politics because people just don't care. People don't really talk politics here in the USA. Much less foreign politics. Like I said before stop looking at the USA through the looking glass of mainstream media.

The price we pay for having free speech? I didn't know free speech was such a burden.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[PizzaOnTheRoof]

the style of governance

You mean authoritarianism? Welding peoples doors shut? Disappearing journalists and whistleblowers?

It’s ok guys they just have a different style of governance.

As if the Hong Kong riots are because someone knocked over their sandcastle.

 

[ygtrhos]

The price we pay for having free speech? I didn't know free speech was such a burden.

All rights come with their responsibilities. Not only free speech.

Trust me no one in the USA comments on other countries politics because people just don't care.

This is just your personal opinion. Seen many enough Americans do otherwise.

"Trust me" Yeah I did, like 100%.

I would drop all my life experience, my own judgments, personal opinions, my own righteousness, just because a dude half across the globe told me to "trust him".

This American gets tired of hearing foreigners constant criticism of all things American because it's real easy to say what should have been done after the fact or when you are sitting in the peanut gallery.

1. Nobody criticizes America in this thread, there was just a German guy, who was commenting about a possible war with China.

2. 99% of Americans sit in the "peanut gallery" as well, so pretty much everyone except politicians and soldiers should shut the F*ck up as well, according to that logic.

Like I said, as much as you guys can talk freely about others, others can also talk about you. You guys have no hidden privileges or something.

So let's say you are German and you are offering your comment on how the US should have done something differently. My question is what the f*** did Germany do?

I am not trying to discuss politics here (of which I also can state an opinion, but I prefer not to).

My point is about not quieting others.

 

[Trevor Kuntz]

Well, I'm a f*cking Marine so I get to have an opinion, right?

Sure, but you’re not special and I don’t know why you expect people to give your opinion extra weight simply because of your military service. Every member of this worldwide forum gets to have an opinion on a topic with clear global implications. No country would be unaffected by war between the two largest world powers. Unless you are currently serving AND employed at the point of confluence between military strategy and national foreign policy, your opinion is equally as valuable as those you consider to be in the peanut gallery.

 

[Kevin88660]

They're already here!

It is a very complicated game.

U.S. hawks are the pentagon officials who are wary of the growing influence of China. But Trump and supporters are looking at China more from an Economics angle. There is so much Economic pain and wealth in equality..as long as jobs are back and lives gets better in the country who cares which country rules the world? On the surface there seems to be a consensus against China but it is not.

Joe Biden is modifying his positions to be more like Bernie Sanders..to neat Trump..seems like 1930s on a smaller scale “communism vs fascism”. The poor want wealth confiscation of the rich and the rich in their defense prop up a right Wing populist to blame foreigners and ethnic minority...

On a balance of probability the politics in U.S. is going to shift to the left..rather than right. The millennials are very liberal..they are less likely to See their problems due to Mexicans crossing the war or Chinese taking away factory line jobs..(They want to be Youtube influencers being “life coach” at age 25). The natural process of old voters aging and dying is something that will spell the end of right wing/protectionist populism.
The millennials will be more interested in taxing Jeff Bezos than giving China a tariff on iphone parts.

Tax Bezos to give me money buy cheap Iphones...or risk war with China for factory jobs in Detroit... easy choices for millenials

 

[Mckenzie]

"The Indo-Pacific is where we live — and we want an open, sovereign Indo-Pacific, free from coercion and hegemony," a copy of the speech says.

Scott Morrison evokes World War II as Australia unveils larger, more lethal defence strategy

Australia will adopt a more aggressive defence strategy designed to counter the rising threat from China, with Scott Morrison warning the country faces regional challenges on a scale not seen since World War II.

www.abc.net.au

If Morrison's defence strategy sounds like war talk, that's because it is Morrison has committed $270 billion to defence spending over the next 10 years

• The ADF will get long-range anti-shipping missiles as it refocuses on possible conflict with China in the Indo-Pacific
• The PM says the region is the "epicentre" of rising strategic competition

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[Andreas Thiel]

Hi all.

We are in the middle of a trade war. Does anybody think we will see an actual war with China?

Given the issues in the oil sector, I thought a war with Iran is likely. That might "solve" the problem of low prices.

But what about Brzezinski and the grand chessboard? How else could China be subdued economically?
As far as I know, think tanks have determined that a war with China must happen soon, before China gets too powerful.

China media calls for nukes to be TRIPLED to fend off US amid virus backlash

CHINESE state media has called for a tripling of nation’s nuclear arsenal to fend off the “warmongering” US as tensions rage over the coronavirus pandemic. The Global Times ̵…

www.thesun.co.uk

War has historically been great for GDP growth. Presidents get reelected if they are in a war.

The USA is practising nuklear strikes.

US Nukes Russia in Simulation Exercise

US Nukes Russia in Simulation Exercise

www.nationaldefensemagazine.org

World War 3 threat: US warned after ‘dangerous’ nuclear simulation

A SIMULATION of a nuclear attack on Russia by the United States is upping the stakes and making an apocalyptic showdown between the superpowers more likely, a senior Russian politician has claimed.

www.express.co.uk

The economic sactions that Trump considered recently sound pretty close to something that usually leads to military conflicts.

Has this been discussed here, already? I did a search, but mostly found this rant RANT - China is our #1 enemy and what to do about it which does not mention the war option, but shows a sentiment that politicians can tap into ... as well as trade war related threads.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[Deleted78083]

This thread is absolutely bizarre.

You got it hahaha

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[AFMKelvin]

Okay, I understand that.

I was trying to get myself away from the topic itself and only talking about the whereabouts, but there is this article on Forbes, written by a commenter, that is interesting.

Basically it kinda links what people think, with its impact on the elections, and international policy at the same time.

From my interpretation reading this article, the key point here is that Trump can lose swing states if unemployment continues as it is, allied with the fact that the fighting against coronavirus isn't going very well in comparison with China, continuing to attack China probably won't work/won't be enough to redirect the attention of his key voters.

Trump’s Attack On China Could Ruin His Re-Election Bid

By focusing his attack on China, Trump may have inadvertently provided clear evidence of his failure in making America great again.

www.forbes.com

And it seems to be a "nice guy" to comment this (studied public policy, it's Asian but lived in North America a couple of years as well). It would be better if it was Chinese, though. I guess it's from Singapore. But it's still very good.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/yuwahedrickwong/?originalSubdomain=ca

This is what I'm trying to point out. Foreigners get all their information from mainstream media corporations. Which are heavily funded by China. Don't trust USA's news. There's a reason Trump keeps calling them fake news. Go back and watch the news for the 2016 election. It was predicted that Trump would not even be nominated for the Republican party and than the polls said Trump would not win the election. Foreigners thin the news are real. They are not. They all have an agenda and their "polls" are fabricated.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[Digamma]

EDIT: Nope. Not getting baited. Mods, you can delete this post.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[Lyinx]

Maybe that is why I am asking!?

Did I state an opinion, or ask a question . I am just really worried because I can't come up with a more benign answer to the question "how else could this conflict play out?".

I am grateful to hear the opinions of people who can tell how likely or not it is that politicians could get a majority behind a war or not - if 10,000,000 jobs in the oil industry are lost.
The answer that nobody is currently even thinking about it is very comforting.

I am a little surprised that the question is considered laughable. I don't think "The Grand Chessboard" is Chinese propaganda ... but yes, didn't know politics are a nono. So I'll shut up.

From a purely game theory perspective, it plays out by going back to the status quo.

Let's be clear -- the US government doesn't care about the death toll from the virus. They could use it as a pretext to implement other strategies that they need justification for, but there's likely no real desire for retribution or forced compensation for anything related to the virus. (If you don't believe this, all you have to do is look at Saudi Arabia murdering thousands of Americans on 9/11 to know that our government doesn't truly care about the death tolls.)

So, things will likely go back to where they were pre-virus. Where is that? Well, if you go back to pre-2016, there really wasn't much concern over China trade at all. Trade imbalances aren't inherently bad, and with the exception of intellectual property concerns, pretty much nobody was complaining about China before the last election. In fact, we can pretty much credit the economic expansion of the past 30 years in this country to two things -- the Internet and China.

If anyone other than Trump is elected in November (from either party), our relationship with China will likely return to pre-2016 dynamics. If Trump wins in November, we'll likely see increased rhetoric, more fake promises from China, more claims of great strides from Trump, and ultimately no real movement over the next 4 years.

Unless, of course, China feels like there is too much pressure being put on them, in which case, they have plenty of economic and monetary leverage to make things more painful for our consumers as well. In fact, I'd argue they have more leverage than we do -- and we have more to lose -- and any escalation of trade war over the next few years will likely take a toll on our economy.

Then, in 2024, whoever wins will go back to status quo with China.

It's worth mentioning that if our currency collapses between now and then, China will likely be the next world economic superpower.

I'll answer this as my a citizen of the US.. : No, I don't see us going to war with China (or China with us) in the conventional sense.
Here is the reasoning(s)
China is touting itself as being "socialist, with capitalist leanings", phrase that I made up, but its what I think they are leaning towards.
What do I think that this means? In my opinion, China is starting to work like a business, they are looking to maximize profits as a "business" and there are literally hundreds of scenarios that they could play out to maximize their profits.
I'm still studying these few books lately:
Art of war
Xi's two books of speeches that he made.(note: I read them, and say, this is what the Chinese media wants us to know about China and where they are going, might not be the direction that they are going!)
The book on Chinese "total warfare"

Strategy that I think the Chinese are using:
1. Make the world dependent on Chinese goods, at low prices
2. raise prices, to move $$$ from the world and into China
3. repeat, with variations. If anything becomes mass-market, then make it! don't make small batches of anything, sell quantity! Flood the Market and be the only supplier!

What would the US do if China would increase prices by 200% overnight (if a fidget spinner used to cost $.33 each, now it would be $1.00) if a chair used to cost $100, now it would be $300.
If your Iphone used to cost $2500, it might now cost $2995 (or, more likely) they will use the rising prices as an excuse to put the Iphone up to $3975.

Alternate strategy (make US citizens very happy to work with China/give them $$$)
If your meat was processed in China, then they can refuse to ship a shipment (unlikely, as that makes the US citizens upset to them) so they would rather do this:
1. make it dirt-cheap to take meat from the US, to China to be processed, then return to the US.
2. make it difficult to get meat that's made in the US (processing plants shutdown?)
3. US citizens become upset due to lack of meat
4. China starts putting Chinese writing on all of the meat that they pack, and all of a sudden, all the meat in Walmart has Chinese writing on it, Yay, we have meat!
5. public praises China for their generosity and gives them money to process even more, and starts getting them to do other things.
6. US processing plants go out of business.
7. China raises prices 10% per year

repeat for every business out there, until you have Chinese counselors/therapists and dentists.

Don't think it could happen? they already process 50% of our meat...

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.