An interesting thought came to my mind and I just can't seem to decide.
What comes first: validation of an idea or the preparation, the research part?
I just don't know. It seems from my experience that I have to do a little of preparation before I could validate the idea, but then again when I validate the idea, I may be wrong or too optimistic because I have not gotten enough data first.
Or is validation just part of preparation? What's your take on this and how have you done in the past?
What comes first: validation of an idea or the preparation, the research part?
I just don't know. It seems from my experience that I have to do a little of preparation before I could validate the idea, but then again when I validate the idea, I may be wrong or too optimistic because I have not gotten enough data first.
Or is validation just part of preparation? What's your take on this and how have you done in the past?
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.