So far, only MJ, JamItFast and Vigilante have contributed any value to this thread. The others are just giving pointless answers.
It kind of reminds me those "law of attraction" guys that keep saying "you just have to keep visualizing! you are not yet truly believing you can do it!"... C'mon guys... get out
It's extremely annoying how many of you come to this thread and reply like I have no idea of what I'm talking about.
I wonder how many of you who have replied actually experienced this problem to be capable of understanding the situation.
This is serious guys.
@JamItFast
Why would you sell a product for only $10 each can you tell me one product that is sold at this low of price?
Two reasons:
Reson 1)
If you follow most of the models suggested by MJ in the book, you will be brokering something / selling advertising / lead generation.
In any of this models, you only get a share of what you make.
If you are getting 10% commission and you sell a widget that costs $100, you get $10, despite being selling a relatively high-unit-price.
In lead gen or advertising, you get to keep even less in most cases.
So, it's not like you are selling a low priced item, it's more like you are only getting a share of it.
Reson 2)
If you decide to sell higher priced widgets instead, to compensate for the "low margins", you market will narrow.
The more expensive something is, the less people can afford it.
Most "mass market" products are all very affordable.
Now, regarding SEO...
I just need someone to explain to me how scale is achieved through SEO - real scale, enough to generate 10.000 visitors a day.
Do you rank for a long tail keyword, and when you are successful you start ranking for other related long tail keywords?
I don't get it...
Even in the offline world, the people I know start by direct mail... buying just 5000 names...
if they make it work... they buy more names...
when the list is used, they look for related lists
when there are no more lists, they get a half page ad on a magazine
if it works, they get a full page ad
if it works they expand to other magazines
and so on and so on, and eventually they get into television.
I can understand this.... it's logical...
I can understand how someone could do something similar on the internet... trying ads for one keyword, and if it works, buy ads for related keywords... etc
But SEO?
It's not only slow, but the growth seems to be linear.
I'm not talking about a PR stunt that can give you a boost, I'm talking about something stable.
I don't see where's the explosive growth, or how you can scale something to 10.000 visitors a day on SEO alone, when most keys with volume are really a tough nut to crack and will take an undefined amount of time to rank for.
It's seems slow, unreliable and unpredictable.
It's really different from the instant/exponential/explosive growth I know from paid advertising.
I'd love to be proven wrong, or that someone shows me what I'm missing.