- Thread starter
- #31
Know about this video for a long time.not exactly the same... you might find it interesting
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
SPONSORED: GiganticWebsites.com: We Build Sites with THOUSANDS of Unique and Genuinely Useful Articles
30% to 50% Fastlane-exclusive discounts on WordPress-powered websites with everything included: WordPress setup, design, keyword research, article creation and article publishing. Click HERE to claim.Join over 90,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.
Free registration at the forum removes this block.Know about this video for a long time.not exactly the same... you might find it interesting
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyQwgBAaBag&t=1070s
not exactly the same... you might find it interesting
This. Add it to the list of perpetual motion scamsIf you put a turbine on top of a car, you might get a little bit of energy back, but every power generation method operates at less than 100% efficiency.
So no, it wouldn’t provide unlimited energy.
Like @lowtek said, unless you just made the greatest discovery in human history, this is physically impossible.
Perpetual motion machines do not exist. (Unless you just discovered the greatest thing in human history, rewriting all of science forever, which I doubt)
Every method possible for generating energy loses some of that energy in the process.
Here come Mr. Scambuster for howling "SCAM! SCAM!" without knowing anything.This. Add it to the list of perpetual motion scams
Here come Mr. Scambuster for howling "SCAM! SCAM!" without knowing anything.
Then why hasn't it been made already?This is an approved patent.
Perpetual motion machines create energy out of nothing. But that machine doesn't claim so. All details are given in the description, kindly read and decide. There are some maths there in the application.I don't see how this device stays running. You'd need to input power to get it going, and then ??? Granted I haven't done the math, but it seems like perpetual motion.
basically (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong), 3 partsPerpetual motion machines create energy out of nothing. But that machine doesn't claim so. All details are given in the description, kindly read and decide. There are some maths there in the application.
There are lots of patents that never get built in real life because they can't be built in real life.This is an approved patent.
It's called Venturi Effect.Does that sound like it Revl?
I don't think that was the question - does @Lyinx 's description match your general premise?It's called Venturi Effect.
I have already told that the basic principle behind the invention is Venturi Effect.I don't think that was the question - does @Lyinx 's description match your general premise?
so, the venturi effect would be even greater if you had a 200 foot wide tunnel, and then narrowed it down to a 1" pipe and attach a dewalt shop vac on the other end.... hmmm....I have already told that the basic principle behind the invention is Venturi Effect.
Not possible! There are limitations. But, I don't want to discuss that here.so, the venturi effect would be even greater if you had a 200 foot wide tunnel, and then narrowed it down to a 1" pipe and attach a dewalt shop vac on the other end.... hmmm....
Ventur effect should increase with size, not diminish... unless there is a problem with your math?Not possible! There are limitations. But, I don't want to discuss that here.
There is a final frontier to the increase. You need to know about Venturi Effect a little more.Ventur effect should increase with size, not diminish... unless there is a problem with your math?
so... then why are you here? Wouldn't those people have contacts you could leverage?
None of this makes any sense.
You can have sufficient information if you are ready to sign an NDA. So, no question of "they can't provide more info" type blockhead talks.Possibility #1) They are genuinely smart and came up with a solution that seems correct on paper. They might have made an error somewhere, but they're too caught up in their visions of grandeur that they never double-check their work. They'll also never give you enough information to check their work because their ego won't allow them to be proven wrong. They'll always give you an excuse for why they can't provide more info.
So far, not a single cent has been demanded yet. Just show me an example and I will stop.Possibility #2) They are a genuinely smart but evil person that wants you to pay their bills. They will promise you the world... but it's always just out of reach. They need more funding. They need to land a contract with an impossible company to work with. They need six more months. They need... [fill in the blank]
See below:So far, not a single cent has been demanded yet. Just show me an example and I will stop.
done.This. I need the finance for prototyping and testing. After prototyping and patent application filed, there wouldn't be big problem to market it. I know necessary resources.
You are correct, but this is kind of entertaining.I've fallen for a trap like this before so I feel adequately prepared to answer this.
Let's call it, The "Brilliant" Engineer That Needs Your Funds Trap.
There are two possibilities... and the shitty part is that if the engineer is smart enough, you'll never get any sort of conclusion. You'll never really know which possibility is the real one.. You'll always be in a state of wonder.
Possibility #1) They are genuinely smart and came up with a solution that seems correct on paper. They might have made an error somewhere, but they're too caught up in their visions of grandeur that they never double-check their work. They'll also never give you enough information to check their work because their ego won't allow them to be proven wrong. They'll always give you an excuse for why they can't provide more info.
Possibility #2) They are a genuinely smart but evil person that wants you to pay their bills. They will promise you the world... but it's always just out of reach. They need more funding. They need to land a contract with an impossible company to work with. They need six more months. They need... [fill in the blank]
What should you do?
Walk away and don't look back. Ever.
They are energy and money vampires.
If they were legitimate, they wouldn't be talking to you in a place like this. Instead, they'd be like Lonnie Johnson who patented his invention and then went straight to the people who needed it.
You've been warned!
There are big differences between a proposal and demand. Can you differentiate between the two?done.
Kindly leave that part to me. I need the NDA. Whether I have the fund to sue someone for breaching the contract isn't a matter of concern for anyone other than me. And I know how to deal with such issues in my own way.Catch-22: if you have the funds to sue someone for infringing an NDA, then you never needed the funds to produce the product, and, if you don't have the funds to make the product, then it's pointless to worry about an NDA, so, feel free to explain away as to how it works, or post a video on the forum and we'll give your idea a whirl.
Come on man. Join us in reality.I am an Indian physics graduate and I have been researching on my personal effort on a new kind of technology that can convert atmospheric heat into useful power/electricity and I have succeeded. It's actually a combination of a market available blower and a new kind of turbine that is the main part. The turbine has already been built and tested. A 1 meter diameter prototype can generate 3 kW output at 8 m/s wind. While a market available 1 meter diameter and just 50% efficient blower can generate 8 m/s airflow at the expense of just 500 W.
I am now looking for partnership to develop it further. Can anybody here help anyhow in this regards? I am requesting those who are interested to have some idea about the technology first and then decide. It's a new and disruptive technology so an investor certainly have full right to get necessary information about this technology.
Everyone with blindfolds in their eyes can see it. I agree. And both "fantasy" and "innovation" needs some imagination capability that most like you lacks here.Come on man. Join us in reality.
None of what you are saying makes sense, everyone can see it.
Living a fantasy outside reality is not living.
Saying something IS when its NOT is a path to nothing.
So I take it you prefer the fantasy world?Everyone with blindfolds in their eyes can see it. I agree. And both "fantasy" and "innovation" needs some imagination capability that most like you lacks here.
I know it well. Today morning I have got a signed NDA from an interested party from US.Thats cool, at least you know where your road will lead you to.
And opportunities too. It's upto your capability to differentiate between a trap and an opportunity.Anyway, it's a good practice to see that world if filled with traps.
Join Fastlane Insiders.