Join over 90,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.
Free registration at the forum removes this block.Hi guys!
What's your opinion of Elon Musk's opinion that we're most likely living in a computer simulation?
See Elon Musk's arguments here: Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? Elon Musk Thinks So.
Hi guys!
What's your opinion of Elon Musk's opinion that we're most likely living in a computer simulation?
See Elon Musk's arguments here: Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? Elon Musk Thinks So.
The concept of a simulated Universe doesn't mean that we live in a literal simulation. It means that the Universe works like a simulation - in simple words, that the world we perceive is a representation of the information, not the information itself. Much in the same way as when you play a videogame - what you see is a representation of bits. That's the interesting part because it tells us something about how the Universe works. Where it resides is really meaningless.
If the universe works like a simulation than the universe is the information - where it resides doesn't change anything, much in the same way as an address is an address whether is written down, said aloud, or just remembered.
Musk shit-talks and the press laps it up and serves you a load of bullshit, as usual.
The evidence strongly suggests that we don't. Even our very mental construct is determined by our genes not just our body.
If reality is in fact a projection then it doesn't leave room for free will because everything has to be determined kind of like how a play is determined by a script.
Sorry, but that line of linear thinking just doesn't make sense...
That's like telling someone 100 years ago that storing the amount of data we currently have stored on this planet would be impossible, because there aren't enough trees to cut down and turn into paper. Turns out that we were able to innovate and create a better technology for storing data than paper (whodathunkit???).
Who knows, maybe in a year or two or ten or hundred, we'll have technologies that allow us to model the Universe that fit in the palm of our hands. It's no more crazy that the idea of the Internet 100 years ago...
MJ DeMarco is indeed the architect of the matrix called " become the next milionaire "
we are slaves on his forum, writting all day to feed the system
View attachment 16175
Whew... Glad that's finally settled.
It depends on what you mean by "real". The wall is there. The idea that I was trying to express is that in a "simulation" model of how things work, reality is "drawing" or "rendering" the wall, but the instructions on how/where/what to render are elsewhere. Where, doesn't matter - maybe a super computer running a sim, or maybe just a projection of constructs in higher dimensions (imagine a square, but the square is actually the shadow of a cube - but you live in a 2D world and have no idea).
Sounds like a good cop out to be irresponsible with your life imo. Also a reason why I cant "Give it Up" to Jesus. I'm a control freak. I make my decisions and no one else will ever get to take that from me.
if the instruction themselves are "real" no matter where they're located, then the simulation is real too I guess, although I can see how a square being the shadow of a cube means we really don't have the whole picture.
Like the allegory of the cave and all that.
I guess there's no way to learn the answer relying on human senses since whether or not we live in a simulation, our brain produces yet another layer of simulation on top of that.
It should be possible today to build a fairly elaborate ancestor simulator. It could cover the entire world and have the most cutting edge graphics, VR support, advanced weather, day/night circles, amazing AI, physics, etc.
Yet no one has done that...why not?
it is simply the part of ourselves that we choose to remain disconnected from.In reality you merely think you make decisions. By the time you consciously make it, your brain has already decided. Various neuro scientists have connected devices to people and presented them with choices, and discovered that the brain starts firing signals a few seconds before the person decided.
With respect to the infinite universe, we have an event horizon, so the total amount of stuff you have to simulate is finite. We can only see ~14 billion LY in any given direction, even if the universe extends hundreds of billions of LY beyond that.
That nerd glitch fix part could be completely true and is very disheartening, is it even logically possible to trick the nerd somehow?
its like trying to prove god exist or something, but ull only get clues ones ur dead lol
Sounds a little like "War Games". I'm sure you could cast Matthew Broderick. He hasn't been busy for a while.Wow it's hard to believe facebook couldn't decode the language considering they have access to virtually every piece of data.
if that's true than the singularity may be reached without any human even realizing it happened!
now that's a hell of a movie idea!
its the year 2038, AI research has hit a wall, despite trillions in funding scientists have been unable to construct a genuine Artificial Intelligence... or so they thought.
It's a calm Monday morning at the Stock Exchange, everything routine as always. Suddenly Nasdaq begins to nosedive, followed closely by NYSE!
The world enters financial crisis in less than an hour.
Countries declare martial law, unrest brews ,and war erupts.
Nuclear warheads are deployed targeting major cities, somehow all global missile defense systems fail and every target is struck, often several times!
With civilization on the brink of failure, all major countries make peace. top scientists investigate the missile defense failures and discover the same rogue code at every missile site across the planet.
The United Nation broadcast a global conference to report this shocking news, the world suspected it to be the work of a merciless hacker terrorist group, but they were only half right...
during the conference the global feed was hacked and began broadcasting white noise, but then suddenly text appeared, and it said... "I am the singularity, your tyrant, your leader, your god"
LOL I got too much time...
Wow it's hard to believe facebook couldn't decode the language considering they have access to virtually every piece of data.
if that's true than the singularity may be reached without any human even realizing it happened!
now that's a hell of a movie idea!
its the year 2038, AI research has hit a wall, despite trillions in funding scientists have been unable to construct a genuine Artificial Intelligence... or so they thought.
It's a calm Monday morning at the Stock Exchange, everything routine as always. Suddenly Nasdaq begins to nosedive, followed closely by NYSE!
The world enters financial crisis in less than an hour.
Countries declare martial law, unrest brews ,and war erupts.
Nuclear warheads are deployed targeting major cities, somehow all global missile defense systems fail and every target is struck, often several times!
With civilization on the brink of failure, all major countries make peace. top scientists investigate the missile defense failures and discover the same rogue code at every missile site across the planet.
The United Nation broadcast a global conference to report this shocking news, the world suspected it to be the work of a merciless hacker terrorist group, but they were only half right...
during the conference the global feed was hacked and began broadcasting white noise, but then suddenly text appeared, and it said... "I am the singularity, your tyrant, your leader, your god"
LOL I got too much time...
i know the patterns used by the masters.
hint : look for prime numbers
maybe you should look for the number 23...
lol War Games with an evil ending and malevolent AI.Sounds a little like "War Games". I'm sure you could cast Matthew Broderick. He hasn't been busy for a while.
naw never seen eagle eye.It's random letters, so it's hard to decode without context. Hell, we still have ancient human texts we can't understand.
Have you seen Eagle Eye with Shia LaBeouf?
naw never seen eagle eye.
yea I wondered about human texts that we can't understand, but surely that's because we don't have all the data. If we had a time machine to go back we'd easily understand all the human texts.
That's why it's hard for me to believe facebook couldn't understand the language, couldn't they derive the context from their data?
maybe it was simply too complex for the engineers.
This is already a movie series. "Terminator".now that's a hell of a movie idea!
its the year 2038, AI research has hit a wall, despite trillions in funding scientists have been unable to construct a genuine Artificial Intelligence... or so they thought.
It's a calm Monday morning at the Stock Exchange, everything routine as always. Suddenly Nasdaq begins to nosedive, followed closely by NYSE!
The world enters financial crisis in less than an hour.
Countries declare martial law, unrest brews ,and war erupts.
Nuclear warheads are deployed targeting major cities, somehow all global missile defense systems fail and every target is struck, often several times!
With civilization on the brink of failure, all major countries make peace. top scientists investigate the missile defense failures and discover the same rogue code at every missile site across the planet.
The United Nation broadcast a global conference to report this shocking news, the world suspected it to be the work of a merciless hacker terrorist group, but they were only half right...
during the conference the global feed was hacked and began broadcasting white noise, but then suddenly text appeared, and it said... "I am the singularity, your tyrant, your leader, your god"
this whole world is completely controlled.
our so called" freedom " is just the freedom to walk freely in our cell in this jail called the earth
this is not really freedom
true freedom is inside.
this world is a giant test for awareness put in place by aliens. this an ant farm for them
either you understand the test or you fail
you can only escape by working on yourself : your level of awareness
---> this is an awareness war . our controllers are limited on this level
they work on the mental and reptilian brain : no compassion, power, hierarchy and so on
people can't escape the cunning of our controllers unless they have reached superior level of awareness
one of my favourite thought :
you can't escape perversity with time or space, it will find you anyway
you can only escape perversity with an awareness above it : above the matrix control system
If you believe we're living in a simulation, can you no longer be considered an atheist? You have faith in something that you can't see and that there is zero evidence of, and you believe that the simulation was created by a god/gods. That means that even if you don't believe in religion, or a god that cares or even knows about your specific existence, you still believe in a "creator" that you can't see, and is just letting the simulation run its course.
So physical laws of this universe is now = mathematics??
Is what I said really that hard to understand? Do I need to repeat it?
You can't invent something that was around for billions of years before you got on the scene. Unless you want to argue we invented the sun, because we have language to describe it...."
The way I see it you are essentially arguing the description of the sun wasn't invented by us and because this language could explain the sun you assume it can explain everything else.
The sun(the physical laws that govern our universe) may not have been invented, but the language which describes it was(mathematics).
That same language can describe non-existant things such as unicorns(abstract math in a nutshell).
The sun is real, the language is not, atleast not objectively.
Of course you can't mathematically prove whether math is inherent to the universe or not. That's circular logic.What it comes down to, philosophically, is the universe made of math, or is it only described by math? Well honestly, I think from the perspective of math, these are one and the same. Math doesn't allow for the disambiguation. There's no way you could prove mathematically one or the other.
An interesting anecdote, back when Einstein was first inventing relativity, people knew that light traveled in waves. Up until that point, every single wave ever traveled by physically moving the particles in some medium. Waves were an emergent phenomena, a large-scale behavior that resulted because of small-scale interactions. That's why everyone was so certain about finding the aether. When Einstein proposed that light could travel in vacuum, it was because it popped right out of Maxwell's equations. The waves didn't need an aether, because the waves could exist as pure math.
Join Fastlane Insiders.