I think she was talking about something different: the accusation that his speech incited violence, and whether or not that even has grounds.Ugh. This has nothing to do with free speech.
The Constitution guarantees that speech is protected from consequence by the government, not protected by consequence from private businesses.
Sorry, but this is not a constitutional free speech issue. And it's truly disheartening that so many people are so ignorant of our constitution that they think it is.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Last edited: