This was a nice and unique insight. Something that I have noticed in my real life.For example, you're not angry that you can't fly, because you correctly perceive that this isn't under your control. But you are angry that you're not rich: because you perceive that this is in your control.
Yep saw that thread right after I had replied in this thread. I completely agree with you 100%. Even Nietzsche has said the same things about stoicism. Anyway, if I may ask, what philosophy do you follow that is actually congruent with 'success mindset'?I personally lean towards agreeing with you, but a hardcore Stoic would say that you can't give up control over something that you don't control to begin with. Whether your tennis serve lands inside your opponent's court isn't something that you control. Factually it's not. Who knows, maybe a gust of wind blows exactly when you serve and it makes it land outside.
So all that you control is how you serve: focusing on your technique and executing what you've done in practice so many times to the best of your ability. A Stoic would say that you can control whether you win a tennis match or not is inaccurate, and it is this belief that makes you get angry when you lose. Your focus should be on playing the best tennis, NOT on winning, since winning isn't something you can control, but playing your best tennis is.
Most people don't understand the dichotomy of control... it's not prescriptive, it doesn't tell you how you SHOULD behave, it tells you how you DO in fact behave. The Stoic theory of mind suggests that it is impossible to get angry over something that you do NOT perceive as being under your control. For example, you're not angry that you can't fly, because you correctly perceive that this isn't under your control. But you are angry that you're not rich: because you perceive that this is in your control.
So the dichotomy of control isn't about you CHOOSING whether something is in your control or not. It's about how that belief will impact your emotions. And if you want to change that impact, you need to change how you reason about it. Another example: if someone perceives that getting rich isn't in their control, then they will not be angry that they're not rich. Anger will simply be impossible for them to experience with regards to wealth.
So if the Stoic sees someone who is angry that they're not wealthy, they will tell them to look at the dichotomy of control. Not in the sense of suggesting that they can CHOOSE not to be angry (the stoics didn't believe this), but in the sense that they should re-assess whether being wealthy is in their control or not. And the Stoics would say it's not. Hence feeling angry that you're poor is stupid.
My thoughts as to why I disagree with stoicism are here:
MINDSET - Thoughts on Stoicism?
I read some negative things about it on here and was a bit confused. I started reading a book on it and managed to apply the knowledge to better control and redirect my (negative) emotions. For example, I was scared to shit for a piano performance (200+ people) and applied a technique (which I...www.thefastlaneforum.com
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.