- Thread starter
- #31
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
146%
- May 29, 2021
- 549
- 804
Apologies for the needless back and forth. I'm going to change my mind where necessary and explain my thoughts where necessary because that's probably the source of the confusion.
I've gone over my thoughts when I wrote that section months ago, and I'm going to elaborate on it.
"Pain is an indicator of damage to your physical or mental being.
The brain works by connecting ideas to each other. When you think of an idea (Which is a noun), the brain brings up related ideas (nouns). The brain always conjures nouns in the form of mental images. We know this to be incorrect, especially since we see the world as a video of sorts (For visual based people), but others might not. Rather it should say, "The brain CAN conjure nouns in the form of mental images."
We can conceptualize nouns as static images, and note that (most) verbs are associated with a change in an image (a noun) over time. I dare say, it’s how humans comprehend the world. This is where the confusion probably came in. What I meant here is, "if we conceptualise nouns as static images, you'll notice that most verbs are associated with a change in the image (noun) over time before the verb occurred. I dare say, nouns are the elements of our world, and the interactions between them (verbs) is how we understand the world."
Actions are therefore, just noun to verb to noun activity for example. Ok, gotta stop myself here. Going back months before I refined my thought process on this, this is how I thought of these "Actions".
A (Noun) works on (Verb) B (Noun).
OR
A (Noun) Rolls to (Verb) B (Noun).
Here, you can even think of it as A (Noun) Rolls to (Verb) B (Target Noun).
Let's take A and B as two balls. A has been moving to B but it hasn't done anything to it yet. The split second before it hits B (and thus changes its state) and before that is what I call the "Action" here. Note nothing has really happened to B, and A just moves to B.
Action: Noun to verb to noun activity. (These actions realize the reaction. No realization = unreachable reaction). I remember you giving the example, "I eat apple". There, I would say you moving or changing state is the action and the split second before you "eat" the apple is still part of the action. Regardless of if this is wrong or not, which it might, just wanted to lay my understanding bare.
Reaction: Noun to verb activity OR Noun to verb to noun activity (Validate the action. No validation = Action is useless). Corrections. Immediately after ball B changes state due to A's action and beyond is what I'd call the Reaction/outcome.
B(Noun) rolls away (verb)
OR
B(Noun) rolls away (verb) from A(Noun)
The reaction, is what happens immediately after that verb occurs.
In your, "I eat apple" example,
(Noun) Apple (Verb) deforms is the outcome I see.
"
I've gone over my thoughts when I wrote that section months ago, and I'm going to elaborate on it.
"Pain is an indicator of damage to your physical or mental being.
The brain works by connecting ideas to each other. When you think of an idea (Which is a noun), the brain brings up related ideas (nouns). The brain always conjures nouns in the form of mental images. We know this to be incorrect, especially since we see the world as a video of sorts (For visual based people), but others might not. Rather it should say, "The brain CAN conjure nouns in the form of mental images."
We can conceptualize nouns as static images, and note that (most) verbs are associated with a change in an image (a noun) over time. I dare say, it’s how humans comprehend the world. This is where the confusion probably came in. What I meant here is, "if we conceptualise nouns as static images, you'll notice that most verbs are associated with a change in the image (noun) over time before the verb occurred. I dare say, nouns are the elements of our world, and the interactions between them (verbs) is how we understand the world."
Actions are therefore, just noun to verb to noun activity for example. Ok, gotta stop myself here. Going back months before I refined my thought process on this, this is how I thought of these "Actions".
A (Noun) works on (Verb) B (Noun).
OR
A (Noun) Rolls to (Verb) B (Noun).
Here, you can even think of it as A (Noun) Rolls to (Verb) B (Target Noun).
Let's take A and B as two balls. A has been moving to B but it hasn't done anything to it yet. The split second before it hits B (and thus changes its state) and before that is what I call the "Action" here. Note nothing has really happened to B, and A just moves to B.
Action: Noun to verb to noun activity. (These actions realize the reaction. No realization = unreachable reaction). I remember you giving the example, "I eat apple". There, I would say you moving or changing state is the action and the split second before you "eat" the apple is still part of the action. Regardless of if this is wrong or not, which it might, just wanted to lay my understanding bare.
Reaction: Noun to verb activity OR Noun to verb to noun activity (Validate the action. No validation = Action is useless). Corrections. Immediately after ball B changes state due to A's action and beyond is what I'd call the Reaction/outcome.
B(Noun) rolls away (verb)
OR
B(Noun) rolls away (verb) from A(Noun)
The reaction, is what happens immediately after that verb occurs.
In your, "I eat apple" example,
(Noun) Apple (Verb) deforms is the outcome I see.
"
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Last edited: