- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Messages
- 1,385
Rep Bank
$1,105
$1,105
User Power: 19%
A couple months ago I created this thread asking about different methods and services people recommend for indexing backlinks and since I got several good responses, I thought I'd create a mini case study to see which indexing method really works the best.
For this case study I'm going to be using Senukex to build the links. This will consist of having original articles created (500+ words each), spinning them with The Best Spinner (to at least ~30% uniqueness), then submitting to senukex's list of web2.0 properties and article directories and also creating profile links on both web2.0 sites and forums.
When I manually create campaign projects in senukex (as I will do with this test) I typically get the following results:
Web2.0 property links (social sites) - 30
Article directory links - 20
Web2.0 profile links - 20
Forum profile links - 140
= 210 links per campaign project
However, I believe a larger sample size than 210 links is needed to make a judgement on which indexing method is the best, so I will create 3 campaign projects for each method, for a total of 630 backlinks. I believe that should be a large enough sample size to pull data from.
I plan on testing 6 different methods with this case study to see which produces the best indexing results.
Method 1 - Control group. Google will have to find these links on its own.
Method 2 - Backlinks energizer
Method 3 - Pinging the links via Scrapebox's rapid indexer addon
Method 4 - Bookmarking the links with Bookmarking Demon
Method 5 - Scrapebox - 31,500 url auto approve blog comments (50 blog comments per link)
Method 6 - Linklicious basic account (creating rss feeds out of the links and pinging until crawled)
I plan to provide the results of indexing at increments of 24hrs, 48hrs, 72hrs, 96hrs, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks. At the end of the 4 weeks, we'll determine a winner based on the percentage of links indexed.
If you have any suggestions for the case study, please let me know before I begin the test. I plan to begin the case study in a few days, have to give my writers a few days to create the articles and get everything set up.
For this case study I'm going to be using Senukex to build the links. This will consist of having original articles created (500+ words each), spinning them with The Best Spinner (to at least ~30% uniqueness), then submitting to senukex's list of web2.0 properties and article directories and also creating profile links on both web2.0 sites and forums.
When I manually create campaign projects in senukex (as I will do with this test) I typically get the following results:
Web2.0 property links (social sites) - 30
Article directory links - 20
Web2.0 profile links - 20
Forum profile links - 140
= 210 links per campaign project
However, I believe a larger sample size than 210 links is needed to make a judgement on which indexing method is the best, so I will create 3 campaign projects for each method, for a total of 630 backlinks. I believe that should be a large enough sample size to pull data from.
I plan on testing 6 different methods with this case study to see which produces the best indexing results.
Method 1 - Control group. Google will have to find these links on its own.
Method 2 - Backlinks energizer
Method 3 - Pinging the links via Scrapebox's rapid indexer addon
Method 4 - Bookmarking the links with Bookmarking Demon
Method 5 - Scrapebox - 31,500 url auto approve blog comments (50 blog comments per link)
Method 6 - Linklicious basic account (creating rss feeds out of the links and pinging until crawled)
I plan to provide the results of indexing at increments of 24hrs, 48hrs, 72hrs, 96hrs, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks. At the end of the 4 weeks, we'll determine a winner based on the percentage of links indexed.
If you have any suggestions for the case study, please let me know before I begin the test. I plan to begin the case study in a few days, have to give my writers a few days to create the articles and get everything set up.
Dislike ads? Become a Fastlane member:
Subscribe today and surround yourself with winners and millionaire mentors, not those broke friends who only want to drink beer and play video games. :-)
Last edited by a moderator:
Access Restricted: Unlock 1,000,000+ Posts
Stop Peeking Through the Keyhole.
Open the Door.
You hit a wall because the best advice isn't free—it's earned. Since 2007, MJ DeMarco has been active here daily (99.9% active rate), building a war room for entrepreneurs who refuse to settle for mediocrity.
- Active Daily: Life-changing content posted dozens of times every day. No dead threads.
- MJ's Inner Circle: Direct access to the author of The Millionaire Fastlane.
- Vetted Network: Connect with founders scaling to 7 and 8 figures.
- Proven Roadmaps: Strategy over motivation. Execution over "hustle porn."
"SCALED TO 6-FIGURE MONTHS"
"Tips and advice here saved me from huge mistakes, others allowed me to scale my business to 6-figure months."— User MitchC
"INSANE QUALITY OF PEOPLE"
"The number of high quality people I've met from this forum has been insane. All of it predicated on building real value."— User Richard Peck
"You are the average of the five people you surround yourself with."
Are you surrounding yourself with success?
