• The Entrepreneur Forum | Startups | Entrepreneurship | Starting a Business | Motivation | Success
  1. The forum software will be upgraded on Sunday May 26th and may not look normal during the transition. Some functionality may be offline. This is TEMPORARY and is expected to last up to 8 hours.
  2. Join 50,000+ entrepreneurs
    who are kicking butt and
    winning their dream life.

    Unscripted™ Entrepreneurship:
    A Business That Pays More Than Money, It Pays Time.

    "Fastlane" is an entrepreneur discussion forum based on The Unscripted Entrepreneurial Framework (TUNEF) outlined in the two best-selling books by MJ DeMarco (The Millionaire Fastlane and UNSCRIPTED™). From multimillionaires to digital nomads, the forum features real entrepreneurs creating real businesses.

    Download (Unscripted) Download (Millionaire Fastlane)  Register
    Registering for the forum removes this block!

Real Estate 3 bd SFH or 2 bd SFH w/ garage - Need Help

Discussion in 'Real Estate Investing' started by Corrado79, Feb 11, 2008.

  1. Corrado79
    Offline

    Corrado79 New Contributor

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Location:
    Santa Monica, CA
    Rep Bank:
    $37
    Hey everyone, I am getting very close to doing my second deal (own a rental Condo), but I have come to a pass and need help from all of your wonderful minds.

    I am looking at getting a SFH (actually, more like a Townhouse) which is located in a development near a medium sized college in Colorado. Over half of the residents are families, with the remaining being mostly students. I am looking at two properties and cannot decide which is the better investment. Both of them are priced equally (around $125k). The development was completed in 2004.

    Property (1) - 2 bedroom / 2 bath (with a garage)
    This property has had some slight improvements (granite/marble countertops, tile instead of linoleum, etc.) and is in great condition. It is currently being rented out at $950/mo through 9/08 by a family with a child who allegedly plan on staying for awhile. That rent appears to be about $100 over market, which could be problematic if the tenants leave when the lease expires in September. These are the most popular units in the development and sell and rent easily. I have calculated its cap rate (using the current rental figure) at 6.1%.

    Property (2) - 3 bedroom / 2 bath (no garage)
    This property is also in good condition, but without improvements. It is currently being rented out by college students for $850/mo through 12/08. That rent appears to be about $100 under market (it's rented out to the current owner's daughter), which will stick through December. These units primarily only rent to college students because they don't mind the lack of a garage in the winter. Accordingly, the resale market (really only investors) is somewhat slim. Current cap rate is 5.5%.

    My plan is to hold and rent the property in 5 years, where I will either sell it if the market is strong or refinance it. Either way, I would like to have some equity available in 5 years to roll into another property. In the interim, I am only putting 5% down so the property only slightly cash flows/breaks even if there is no vacancy or major repairs (possible, but unlikely).

    Thoughts? Which one would you take and why? TIA! :thankyousign:
     
  2. andviv
    Online

    andviv Gold Contributor Read Millionaire Fastlane FASTLANE INSIDER Speedway Pass Summit Attendee

    Messages:
    5,411
    Likes Received:
    2,172
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Rep Bank:
    $3,421
    Property 1 looks better for me.
     
  3. tbsells
    Offline

    tbsells Contributor

    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    57
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Location:
    Ohio
    Rep Bank:
    $56
    You are basically buying for appreciation. If property number 2 has a limited resale market (investors only,) then it is unlikely to appreciate as much as property number 1 which could be sold to an investor or owner occupant. Also, if prop. 2 is rented to college students it will likely have higher than average wear and tear and repair costs. Based in the info you provided prop. 1 sounds better to me.
     
  4. kurtyordy
    Offline

    kurtyordy Bronze Contributor

    Messages:
    2,376
    Likes Received:
    276
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Location:
    PA
    Rep Bank:
    $240
    The biggest issue for you, is what is your capital strategy for carrying these when the vacancies and repairs occur? Can you afford to carry it if it happens to sit vacant for 6 months or more? If the answer is no, then you need to buy cheaper.

    To answer your question though:
    It seems you are in pretty much the same boat with either property on the front side, however, if property one has a greater rental market demand, then go with one. Rents will typically continue to rise and will rise faster on the property that has more demand associated with it.
     
  5. rcardin
    Offline

    rcardin Contributor

    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    46
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Rep Bank:
    $81
    How can you cash flow with buying a 125k property that brings in 850-950 a month?

    If you wanted to keep one longer than 5 years I would say put the money in the college rental. Put stainless steel wrap around counter tops and replace sheet rock as it gets tore up with 1/2" mdf. Over 5 years it should become a bullet proof house for college student rentals. Hence long term hold.

    College students either live on campus or eventually move off campus. Daddy and Mommy still write the checks most of the time. Why not offer the alternative to dorm rooms for 3 students who can make the rent together and have their parents pay for it.
     
  6. Corrado79
    Offline

    Corrado79 New Contributor

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Location:
    Santa Monica, CA
    Rep Bank:
    $37
    Thanks everyone! Your sentiments echo my gut feeling, but my only remaining concern is about future rents. I feel that with Property (1), there is room to raise rent, but with Property (2), I might be exposed to a reduction in rent. One of the things I've picked up here is purchasing properties based on possible ways you can improve the management of the property and Property (1) would fall into that category. Property (2) is probably maxed out.
     
  7. Corrado79
    Offline

    Corrado79 New Contributor

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Location:
    Santa Monica, CA
    Rep Bank:
    $37
    If I told you that Property (1) (2bd/2ba) ended up being $10k more than Property (2) (3bd/2ba) would your analysis change?
     
  8. 8 SNAKE
    Offline

    8 SNAKE Contributor

    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    44
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Location:
    Midwest
    Rep Bank:
    $80
    If the future rents and marketability of Property 1 are better (like you've said), it would still seem to be the winner. The real question is whether either one of these will actually break even or cash flow a little bit for you. To me, it would make sense to run your numbers backward from what you're doing to arrive at a purchase price that makes sense for you and your investment plan. Once you arrive at that price, make an offer.
     
  9. rcardin
    Offline

    rcardin Contributor

    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    46
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Rep Bank:
    $81
    Once again how can you cashflow a 125 k house that only will bring in 950 tops? Seems to me it would be a -300 each month unless you are planning on putting a large down payment on it.
     
  10. tbsells
    Offline

    tbsells Contributor

    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    57
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Location:
    Ohio
    Rep Bank:
    $56
    I agree with 8snake and rcardin. It doesn't sound like either of these will cashflow. Buying on speculation of appreciation over the next five years is more like gambling (another word for speculation) than investing. I would proceed with caution. Nobody knows where the bottom of this real estate cycle is, but there is good reason to think we are not there yet. Your purchase could just as easily decline in value over the next couple years as it could appreciate. If that happens you will have negative cashflow and negative equity. A double whammy.

    I'm not negative on real estate. I make my living selling it, buying it, reselling it, and renting it. Its still one of the greatest investment opportunities available. But, it is a time for caution and careful analysis. Buying just because you think the value will go up is dangerous. In my opinion, if it doesn't cash flow on day one don't buy it. Of course all real estate is local and I have no knowledge of your particular market area. If you have very sound reasons for thinking it will appreciate in the next five years that may make a difference.
     
  11. Corrado79
    Offline

    Corrado79 New Contributor

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Location:
    Santa Monica, CA
    Rep Bank:
    $37
    I appreciate all of the comments. Very helpful! I will go back to the drawing board and re-run the numbers to make sure it makes sense.
     
  12. Corrado79
    Offline

    Corrado79 New Contributor

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Location:
    Santa Monica, CA
    Rep Bank:
    $37
    As an update, I pulled the plug on this deal. rcardin was right. Although it wasn't going to be -$300/mo, it would be difficult to cash flow with 5% or even 10% down.

    I learned an important but difficult lesson from this. Walking away. Once I get so invested in a deal and it "feels" right, it's hard to walk away even though the numbers say I have to. Now I have to start from scratch, but that's okay. It was probably the right move. Just tough to do.
     
    Yankees338 and kurtyordy like this.
  13. rcardin
    Offline

    rcardin Contributor

    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    46
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Rep Bank:
    $81
    I use my 1% thory when looking at cashflow. Assuming it is a 30 year note. Take 1% of total cost to buy the house and that should be your rent in order to break even. Things may be a little different in CA market but as long as you are looking for house below 150k it should work.

    Here is the type of house I am looking for. Figure 45k at most with closing and paint/basic rehab. Payment shoudl be about 450.00 PITI(pricipal interest tax insurance)
    If I can rent it for 650 (which is low for a 3br1ba) I can still cash flow 200.00 a month.

    http://ntreislistings.marketlinx.co...asp?EMailKey=33127970&prp=mls&AgentID=0571105

    I have a real estate agent emailing me daily with all new listings between 0-60k. These are the homes I can afford to make a payment on if they have to go vacant for a couple of months. With a focussed plan you could pay these off in 10 years or so. Especially if you have a few of them and focus paying one house off with the profits from the others.

    Just my opinion and theory. Take it for what it is worth.
     
    kurtyordy likes this.
  14. kurtyordy
    Offline

    kurtyordy Bronze Contributor

    Messages:
    2,376
    Likes Received:
    276
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Location:
    PA
    Rep Bank:
    $240
    Rep+
    This is key for a newbie. The two most important questions you need to ask are, will it cashflow, and can I carry it if it is vacant.
     

Join 1000s of entrepreneurs who are rewriting life's script and winning financial freedom.

---- ----

You must be a member to join the conversation.

Create Account

Join the community fast and easy!

REGISTER

Log In

Already have an account? Login here.

LOG IN

Share This Page