Who cares if Wall Street 'talent' leaves?

[Seshiro]

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- There's no need to fear a Wall Street brain drain -- despite the crackdown on pay by Washington.
On Thursday, White House pay czar Kenneth Feinberg outlined compensation restrictions at seven firms that got special bailouts, and the Federal Reserve proposed to review pay practices at 28 unnamed giant banks.
Critics warn that reining in pay makes it hard to keep talented employees. Hemmed in, institutions like AIG (AIG, Fortune 500),Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) and Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) could lose their best people.
These firms would then perform even more abysmally, if that's possible, leaving them hard pressed to repay tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer-backed loans.
Still, we say Godspeed to this "talent." After all, the traders and suits in the corner offices don't exactly have an unblemished track record. In 2008, Citigroup, BofA and Merrill Lynch (since acquired by BofA) posted a grand total of $51 billion in losses.
Yet even as they were running themselves into the ground, the firms managed to pay out more than $12 billion in bonuses -- including 1,606 million-dollar-plus bonuses, according to a report from the New York attorney general's office.
"Even a cursory examination of the data suggests that in these challenging economic times, compensation for bank employees has become unmoored from the banks' financial performance," the report said.
Meanwhile, it's hard to imagine that defection-hit firms would have a lot of trouble finding qualified replacements in the current job market.
Unemployment has doubled nationally since December 2007, when the recession started. Securities industry employment has fallen 10% nationwide and 14% in New York from a mid-2008 peak, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data, costing some 90,000 jobs in the U.S.

 

Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

[GlobalWealth]

Wall Street is really just an extension of government. Wall St is in bed with Washington and visa versa. Washington controls what and how the big banks and finance companies operate which in turn leads to wrong incentives for management and bad outcomes for regular people and small investors. But this is all government controlled. This is where I think most people are ill informed. The banks made the sub prime loans to people who couldn't afford them, packaged the loan portfolios and sold them to investors, and leveraged their assets 30+:1 all because of government regulation. In a free market, this would never have happened. It couldn't have. The moment a bank was over leveraged in a free market, it would be eliminated by stronger competition. But in the regulated world, that doesn't happen. Capitalism was not to blame here because capitalism was not involved. Capitalism involves a free market and the banks were and are far from free. Adam Smith's vision of a free market and a corporation were correct, its just that our government doesn't allow this anymore. 100 years ago, yes, but not now. The government has grown in power year by year without giving any power back. The only time in modern history where this happened to some extent was under Reagan where taxes were lowered, government funding decreased, and deregulation. This was also the most prosperous decade in the modern history of the US and of the world. Long story short; wall st=washington.