The Entrepreneur Forum | Financial Freedom | Starting a Business | Motivation | Money | Success

Welcome to the only entrepreneur forum dedicated to building life-changing wealth.

Build a Fastlane business. Earn real financial freedom. Join free.

Join over 80,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.

Free registration at the forum removes this block.

Private Equity or buy & hold?

Cruze

Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
107%
Sep 6, 2016
58
62
34
hey guy,
Which is more lucrative on a 25-year horizon?

1. private equity version
Buy a company -> expand in 4-5 years - sell.
Buy a bigger company with the money, grow it and sell it again in 4-5 years.

Typical private equity business, over 25 years.

2. buy & hold version
Buy a company -> grow it -> keep it.
From the profit buy another company -> grow -> keep. And buy another company after a few years, grow it and keep it. Classic buy & hold, only without shares, but with own companies.

With which model do you get the better return over 25 years?

Greez
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

ljean

Silver Contributor
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
169%
Jan 22, 2017
506
857
USA
Just like any investment, hold it until someone offers you a no-brainer price to take it off your hands.
 

Ronak

Gold Contributor
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
317%
Sep 13, 2013
573
1,816
I would start with the buying and growing part and worry about the rest later.
 

Mathuin

Provide Relative-Value or Die Trying
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
360%
Dec 20, 2020
669
2,410
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Depends.

I think you should worry about building a profitable company first before any of this.

Two examples within a similar industry come to mind. (Felix Dennis & Rupert Murdoch in the magazine biz)

Felix Dennis would likely take the first approach and sell early.

Rupert Mudroch holds his for considerably longer.

Either can work.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Hagi

New Contributor
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
86%
Jul 29, 2021
14
12
The Netherlands
I'm not sure there is a right answer to your question. Time will tell I guess. It will depend on the current circumstances of the business and the opportunities that are there. I think choosing one over the other upfront will only limit your options and capability to make the right decisions down te road.
 

Johnny boy

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
629%
May 9, 2017
2,971
18,691
27
Washington State
Both options have produced million/billionaires and have also bankrupted people.

The variable is the "grow it" part of the equation you have seemed to have written off as a foregone conclusion.

This game is not so cut and dry. It's not a job where you can search for the salary online and see the range. Businesses can lose a billion in a year, make nothing in a year, make a billion in a year, and everything in between. You can do well buying them and growing them into a giant company. You can flip them and move on to something else. The correct move is based on a million different factors. If you started a company and it grew into something as large as Amazon or Telsa, that would be better than hopping around flipping different companies right? It all depends.
 

Post New Topic

Please SEARCH before posting.
Please select the BEST category.

Post new topic

Guest post submissions offered HERE.

Latest Posts

New Topics

Fastlane Insiders

View the forum AD FREE.
Private, unindexed content
Detailed process/execution threads
Ideas needing execution, more!

Join Fastlane Insiders.

Top