D
DeletedUser394
Guest
There are two countries.
Country A has a population of 1 billion.
Country B has a population of 50 million.
They have equal GDP growth, and are both fairly stable politically and have nearly the same tax laws.
Investing in Country A means:
Pro: More opportunities to make money (through stocks and bonds).
Con: A lot more institutional interest, and a lot more sophisticated competition.
Investing in Country B means:
Pro: A lot less institutional interest, and a lot less sophisticated competition. Easier to make profits.
Con: But less opportunities to make money than country A (through stocks and bonds).
The same comparison can be made between Large Blue Chip stocks and small to medium cap companies in the US.
You can also compare it to owning a tiny portion of a large pie (with stiff competition), or a large portion of a Medium pie (with less competition) (but holding huge power within that small pie)
Which would you lean towards as an investment? Country A or Country B, and why?
I'm leaning towards Country A, because you might as well strive to be one of the best, or there's no point in trying at all. You can also raise more capital in larger markets.
Country B is still attractive from the power standpoint. Having larger political power in smaller markets is helpful in advancing your interests (without breaking any laws).
What do you think?
-Ryan
Country A has a population of 1 billion.
Country B has a population of 50 million.
They have equal GDP growth, and are both fairly stable politically and have nearly the same tax laws.
Investing in Country A means:
Pro: More opportunities to make money (through stocks and bonds).
Con: A lot more institutional interest, and a lot more sophisticated competition.
Investing in Country B means:
Pro: A lot less institutional interest, and a lot less sophisticated competition. Easier to make profits.
Con: But less opportunities to make money than country A (through stocks and bonds).
The same comparison can be made between Large Blue Chip stocks and small to medium cap companies in the US.
You can also compare it to owning a tiny portion of a large pie (with stiff competition), or a large portion of a Medium pie (with less competition) (but holding huge power within that small pie)
Which would you lean towards as an investment? Country A or Country B, and why?
I'm leaning towards Country A, because you might as well strive to be one of the best, or there's no point in trying at all. You can also raise more capital in larger markets.
Country B is still attractive from the power standpoint. Having larger political power in smaller markets is helpful in advancing your interests (without breaking any laws).
What do you think?
-Ryan
Dislike ads? Become a Fastlane member:
Subscribe today and surround yourself with winners and millionaire mentors, not those broke friends who only want to drink beer and play video games. :-)
Access Restricted: Unlock 1,000,000+ Posts
Stop Peeking Through the Keyhole.
Open the Door.
You hit a wall because the best advice isn't free—it's earned. Since 2007, MJ DeMarco has been active here daily (99.9% active rate), building a war room for entrepreneurs who refuse to settle for mediocrity.
- Active Daily: Life-changing content posted dozens of times every day. No dead threads.
- MJ's Inner Circle: Direct access to the author of The Millionaire Fastlane.
- Vetted Network: Connect with founders scaling to 7 and 8 figures.
- Proven Roadmaps: Strategy over motivation. Execution over "hustle porn."
"SCALED TO 6-FIGURE MONTHS"
"Tips and advice here saved me from huge mistakes, others allowed me to scale my business to 6-figure months."— User MitchC
"INSANE QUALITY OF PEOPLE"
"The number of high quality people I've met from this forum has been insane. All of it predicated on building real value."— User Richard Peck
"You are the average of the five people you surround yourself with."
Are you surrounding yourself with success?
