Psst I think hes banned.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Join over 90,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.
Free registration at the forum removes this block.The same thing happened in the Facebook VS Microsoft deal. It had nothing to do with percentage ownership. Microsoft didn't give a f*ck about if they owned 0.1% or 10% of Facebook. The only thing they cared about was to dwarf Google and secure a future ad deal at Facebook. They will make their money back and then some (hopefully) with their advertising on that Facebook network. Not from the ownership. They wanted the exclusive rights on Facebook and paid the price to have it. That was the value (Facebook got $240 Million added to their war chest and Microsoft got their most wanted deal). That was what the value exchange was all about. So all of these people complaining about how silly the valuation was is rather moronic and rather sad to listen too. They portrait themselfs as smart an intellectual people, but in reality they miss the whole point behind the concept of "value exchange". But now you know. Valuation is an outcome of a smart and valuable value exchange between two or more parties in business.
Don't feel bad about this. Nobody can predict the future.
Peter Schiff did. So did Ayn Rand.
I don't mean to be condescending or snooty at all, Rickson. I just needed to point out that with enough reason, education, and understanding of patterns that predicting the future (which can never be done to a "T") is entirely possible.
Join Fastlane Insiders.