- Joined
- Mar 14, 2008
- Messages
- 212
Rep Bank
$245
$245
User Power: 1%
Is it ethical to start a company that uses a network marketing (NM) model?
I know that Pampered Chef, which is owned by Berkshire Hathaway, is a NM company but it appears to be different. It makes each person primarily a retailer. The more people he/she has under him/her, the less he/she makes from each person in their downline. Other NM companies primarily increase rewards the bigger the downline. If Pampered Chef saturates a market and recruiting becomes extremely difficult, each person still has a foundation of retailing, whereas a typical NM company doesn't, due to tiny margins.
It seems to me that the continued existence of large NM companies like Amway, is because of the huge failure rate, and the continual replacement of people (rather than the retailing of products to non-members). Otherwise the company would hypothetically take over the world, then collapse like a typical pyramid scheme. This means NM companies actually WANT a lot of failure (yet still want growth). It's like using people (failures) to further the company's future, and the justification is that joining is an opportunity.
No doubt that the model can be effective... But ethical?
I guess one solution is to use the Pampered Chef model, but I don't understand why there doesn't seem to be any others like it. Maybe it's way more difficult?
I know that Pampered Chef, which is owned by Berkshire Hathaway, is a NM company but it appears to be different. It makes each person primarily a retailer. The more people he/she has under him/her, the less he/she makes from each person in their downline. Other NM companies primarily increase rewards the bigger the downline. If Pampered Chef saturates a market and recruiting becomes extremely difficult, each person still has a foundation of retailing, whereas a typical NM company doesn't, due to tiny margins.
It seems to me that the continued existence of large NM companies like Amway, is because of the huge failure rate, and the continual replacement of people (rather than the retailing of products to non-members). Otherwise the company would hypothetically take over the world, then collapse like a typical pyramid scheme. This means NM companies actually WANT a lot of failure (yet still want growth). It's like using people (failures) to further the company's future, and the justification is that joining is an opportunity.
No doubt that the model can be effective... But ethical?
I guess one solution is to use the Pampered Chef model, but I don't understand why there doesn't seem to be any others like it. Maybe it's way more difficult?
Dislike ads? Become a Fastlane member:
Subscribe today and surround yourself with winners and millionaire mentors, not those broke friends who only want to drink beer and play video games. :-)
Access Restricted: Unlock 1,000,000+ Posts
Stop Peeking Through the Keyhole.
Open the Door.
You hit a wall because the best advice isn't free—it's earned. Since 2007, MJ DeMarco has been active here daily (99.9% active rate), building a war room for entrepreneurs who refuse to settle for mediocrity.
- Active Daily: Life-changing content posted dozens of times every day. No dead threads.
- MJ's Inner Circle: Direct access to the author of The Millionaire Fastlane.
- Vetted Network: Connect with founders scaling to 7 and 8 figures.
- Proven Roadmaps: Strategy over motivation. Execution over "hustle porn."
"SCALED TO 6-FIGURE MONTHS"
"Tips and advice here saved me from huge mistakes, others allowed me to scale my business to 6-figure months."— User MitchC
"INSANE QUALITY OF PEOPLE"
"The number of high quality people I've met from this forum has been insane. All of it predicated on building real value."— User Richard Peck
"You are the average of the five people you surround yourself with."
Are you surrounding yourself with success?
