The Entrepreneur Forum | Financial Freedom | Starting a Business | Motivation | Money | Success
  • SPONSORED: GiganticWebsites.com: We Build Sites with THOUSANDS of Unique and Genuinely Useful Articles

    30% to 50% Fastlane-exclusive discounts on WordPress-powered websites with everything included: WordPress setup, design, keyword research, article creation and article publishing. Click HERE to claim.

Welcome to the only entrepreneur forum dedicated to building life-changing wealth.

Build a Fastlane business. Earn real financial freedom. Join free.

Join over 90,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.

Free registration at the forum removes this block.

Warren Buffett: Forget gold, buy stocks

Anything related to investing, including crypto

tchandy

Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
20%
Aug 16, 2007
456
92
Kansas, for now
FORTUNE -- The first thing I notice on my most recent visit with Warren E. Buffett, who recently turned 80, is how incredible he looks. He would look terrific for 50; for 80, he looks like Charles Atlas. He's modest about it, as he is about everything. "It all works great," he says. "The eyes, the hearing -- everything works great ... which it will until it all falls apart."
The second thing you notice is that he is so smart it curls your hair.
My first question, as I sit there on the couch in his office, is: "What about gold? Is this a classic bubble or what?"
"Look," he says, with his usual confident laugh. "You could take all the gold that's ever been mined, and it would fill a cube 67 feet in each direction. For what that's worth at current gold prices, you could buy all -- not some -- all of the farmland in the United States. Plus, you could buy 10 Exxon Mobils, plus have $1 trillion of walking-around money. Or you could have a big cube of metal. Which would you take? Which is going to produce more value?"
Okay, so gold is not a screaming buy to Buffett. What should a typical upper-middle-class person in the U.S. buy to prepare for retirement?
"Equities," Buffett answers without a moment's hesitation.
"The VTI?" I ask.
"That's good enough. Maybe a selection of high-dividend-paying stocks that are likely to raise their dividends. Maybe the top 100 dividend payers of the S&P 500."
Then, after a second's thought, he adds, "Well, maybe not that, but equities."
On the $64,000 question -- whether the recovery was real -- Buffett has no doubt. "Yes," he says, "it's a recovery. It's a slow recovery, but it's a recovery. We're calling back some people at Burlington Northern. We are still letting a few go in other businesses, but we see a pickup in business of heavy users of American Express (AXP, Fortune 500), in freight car loadings at BNSF -- across our businesses, we see slow recovery."
"When would you start hiring a lot more people?" I ask him.
"When demand picks up," he says. "We don't hire because we get a tax break or because someone in the government tells us to. We hire when there's more demand for what we are making or moving or selling. It's that simple."
"Where will the demand come from if a business as big as yours is being so cautious?" I ask.
"It's already coming," he says. "It's already happening, and it will pick up. Look," he adds, "we needed a really big stimulus in the fall of 2008 -- a really, really big stimulus. We didn't get it. It was a miracle that Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) bought Merrill for $29 when it was probably worth 29 cents if left on its own for a few days. If that hadn't happened, everything would have collapsed. The whole commercial-paper market would have stopped. Every domino would have fallen. Berkshire (BRKA, Fortune 500) would have been the last, but it would have fallen too. Ken Lewis saved the whole system for a while, until TARP could rescue it. But now we're just going to get a very slow recovery because people are still scared. But we are seeing recovery, definitely."
"How about in housing?"
"That recovery is still a long way off. That market got way out of equilibrium, and it's going to take a long while for it to get fixed."
Buffett goes into his life and childhood, but I don't see how we can make any money out of that, so I will leave that part out.
What about taxes? Buffett thinks that taxes should be raised on really rich Americans -- ones making $5 million a year, say, and especially ones making $1 billion a year.
"Why would we want to do that" I ask, "if we have a fiscal policy that is explicitly about running large deficits?"
The three of us -- Buffett, my colleague Phil deMuth,and I -- talked for a long time about the size of the deficits relative to "normal peacetime" and World War II, when they were far higher than they are even now. Then Buffett sums up his feelings about it, saying his wish to raise taxes on the very rich is really about social justice more than about fiscal policy.
"I would give anyone an exemption from the higher rates if he had a son or grandson in Afghanistan," he said. "I meet a lot of people at these conferences of rich people, of billionaires," he said. "None of them have anyone in their family in combat."
We talk awhile longer, and then Phil and Warren and I go out for a memorable Italian meal at Piccolo Pete's, which Warren considers the best restaurant in America. I look at him as he chews his meatballs. (He has perfect table manners.)
"This guy is so smart -- it's like he's a machine, but a very friendly, polite, affable machine," I think.
I keep thinking of what I would do if I had even the tiniest fraction of his money. But I never will, so I'll skip that too.
Buffett drives us back to the hotel in his lovely Cadillac. "I bought it because a couple of years ago I saw Congress giving Rick Wagoner (the former CEO of GM) such a going-over that I thought I should help him out by buying a Cadillac."
"Cadillac," I think, remembering an old Bob Dylan song. "Good car to drive, after a war."
Ben Stein is an economist, actor, lawyer, writer and quiz show host from 1988 to 1996 was a professor of law and economics at Pepperdine University School of Law.
Warren Buffett: Forget gold, buy stocks - Oct. 19, 2010
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

lightning

Bronze Contributor
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
35%
Aug 24, 2007
542
188
41
Northern, NJ
Good article, its always fascinating hearing what Warren Buffett has to say. :) Thanks for posting.
 

KevMoDee

New Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
31%
Apr 13, 2010
42
13
Scottsdale, AZ
This is analogous to the whale at the casino. They have so much money sloshing around that the house could buckle based upon only this one player's actions. When you control as much wealth as Buffet does and is in the public eye, what else are you going to say besides to ride out equities? And to say that we're seeing a recovery right now is just being disingenuous. There's no way someone with this much money having the connections that he has seriously believes this.

Here's what you should do now. Buy precious metals, wait for equities / real estate / the dollar to bottom out, then transition back into assets that have solid dividend yields or pay you good rents. Look at the charts comparing the Dow Jones over the past decade vs. gold/silver. Gold itself went from ~$250/oz to ~$1350/oz. The dow went from ~10,500 to ~11,000.

I don't know about you, but I'd take a 540% return over a 5% return. In fact, when you factor in inflation, that 5% return is actually a loss.
 

Darkside

Bronze Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
18%
Jul 4, 2010
782
139
San Diego
This is analogous to the whale at the casino. They have so much money sloshing around that the house could buckle based upon only this one player's actions. When you control as much wealth as Buffet does and is in the public eye, what else are you going to say besides to ride out equities? And to say that we're seeing a recovery right now is just being disingenuous. There's no way someone with this much money having the connections that he has seriously believes this.

Here's what you should do now. Buy precious metals, wait for equities / real estate / the dollar to bottom out, then transition back into assets that have solid dividend yields or pay you good rents. Look at the charts comparing the Dow Jones over the past decade vs. gold/silver. Gold itself went from ~$250/oz to ~$1350/oz. The dow went from ~10,500 to ~11,000.

I don't know about you, but I'd take a 540% return over a 5% return. In fact, when you factor in inflation, that 5% return is actually a loss.


Hindsight is 20/20. If you had gotten into gold a decade ago you'd have made a great investment. As things stand now, gold is very high priced so if you buy now you will likely lose money over the coming years as the price of gold falls. Gold has historically been through cycles of high value and decline; it's smart to buy when gold is low priced and sell when it reaches a high price as it's at right now. It would be like buying a house in an expensive real estate market right before the housing bubble crash in 2008; you'd have lost a lot of money as the value of the house would be much lower now. So, the trick is to buy low and sell high. Wait for gold to come down and then buy when it's reached a low price and hold on to your gold for a few years.

Regarding gold vs. the Dow; that's misleading. No one invests in all the companies within Dow Jones. They invest in a few companies which could potentially yield very high percentages. The Dow and NASDAQ are a measure of the growth of the entire economy; they are not good indicators of the growth of individual companies. So, if you're smart and invest in a few companies that turn out to have huge growth, then you've benefited greatly.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Forza

New Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
1%
Mar 14, 2008
212
3
How can investors know whether gold is high or low relative to its intrinsic value when it's not a cash flowing asset?
 

Darkside

Bronze Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
18%
Jul 4, 2010
782
139
San Diego
How can investors know whether gold is high or low relative to its intrinsic value when it's not a cash flowing asset?


Gold is tied to cash as well as it's abundance. The more gold there is flowing around, the less value it has. If the U.S. sold off all the gold in Fort Knox, gold would be worth practically nothing because of too much of it being in circulation. So, gold is dependent on how much of it is sold off to countries and individuals. It's also tied to currencies since when people feel like their national currency isn't safe, they will tend to buy more gold because they view gold as actually having real world value whereas national currencies are just pieces of paper whose value is determined by public perception and how much is in circulation. Now, due to the global economic recession, gold prices have skyrocketed but they won't stay that way for long; as the global economy recovers, gold prices will fall relative to strong currencies like the dollar, euro, pound, etc.
 

Rickson9

Gold Contributor
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
101%
Sep 4, 2010
1,682
1,699
Canada
How can investors know whether gold is high or low relative to its intrinsic value when it's not a cash flowing asset?

Excellent question!

"You could take all the gold that's ever been mined, and it would fill a cube 67 feet in each direction. For what that's worth at current gold prices, you could buy all - not some - all of the farmland in the United States. Plus, you could buy 10 Exxon Mobils, plus have $1 trillion of walking-around money. Or you could have a big cube of metal. Which would you take? Which is going to produce more value?"

That, in my opinion, was an amazing answer.

All the best!
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

michael

Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
31%
Jul 22, 2008
244
75
Australia
It is really funny when Buffet cries out for higher taxes. He knows he could face en effective tax rate of 90% and still bring in 9 figure income annually so of course he will campaign for more taxes. Social justice is a farce and is merely an excuse to enable irresponsible government spending. There is already equality of opportunity in America and most other developed nations and penalising those who achieve is not the way to make those who don't achieve equal. If he wants to campaign for social justice and equality go to India and campaign against the attitudes stemming from Dalit which still keep millions of people in absolute poverty.



If I was in the USA I wouldn't buy equities (unless they are oil or mineral stocks). Yeah gold has had a solid run but with the FED indicating it may undertake further QE and with so much uncertainty facing real estate and stock markets (in the form of ill thought out healthcare and constant calls for higher taxes and more regulation) I don't see most US stocks rocketing any time soon. Oil and mineral stocks and certain technology stocks might be safe bets, silver too hasn't had a run as good as gold and even gold I'd still consider fairly safe. Best bet of all for Americans would be to buy stocks in certain foreign denominated exchanges where the nation is fundamentally sound and not planning QE (Toronto, Australian, Six Swiss, Oslo). Stocks on the Oslo exchange in particular might be a safe bet because Norway has an incredibly large balance of trade and a solid economy underpinned by oil companies.









edit - just noticed this article was written by Ben Stein you might as well use it as toilet paper. Here is another classic from Ben Stein, you'd swear he is trying a pump and dump scheme with the entire sharemarket:

Wikipedia said:
Ben Stein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On March 18, 2007, in a column for CBS News' online version of CBS News Sunday Morning, Stein famously proclaimed in the beginning of the subprime mortgage crisis that the foreclosure problem would "blow over and the people who buy now, in due time, will be glad they did," the economy was "still very strong," and the "smart money" was "now trying to buy — not sell — as much distressed merchandise" in mortgages as possible.[25]


On August 18, 2007, on Fox News Channel's Cavuto on Business, Stein appeared with other financial experts dismissing worries of a coming credit crunch.[26] The lone dissenter was Peter Schiff, who predicted that the mortgage sector would create a crisis leading to massive recession, a view that produced laughter from the other experts. Stein strongly recommended investing in then-troubled financial institutions.[26]
Ben Stein: The credit crunch is way overblown. The [financial institutions] are being given away; they're so unbelievably cheap...The subprime problem is a problem, but it's a tiny problem in the context of this economy...It's a buying opportunity, especially for the financials, maybe like I've never seen before in my entire life.



Ben Stein: ...subprime is tiny. Subprime is a tiny, tiny blip.
Peter Schiff: It's not tiny. And again, it's not just subprime. It's the entire mortgage market.
Ben Stein: You're simply wrong about that... Defaults for the whole mortgage market are tiny.
[...]
Ben Stein: I think stocks will be a heck of a lot higher a year from now than they are now.​




 

max momo

Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
17%
Mar 15, 2008
197
34
California
Phil Grande did a great segment on his show today (10.20.10) explaining how Buffet (Berkshire et. al.) bundled the toxic mortgage tranches and sold them into the market place as investment grade assets (SIVs). He then bought Goldmans Sachs on their inevitable swoon. In effect, Buffet played them both.

Love it how the rubes fawn on his 'great investing' yet seem to gloss over his financial warfare tactics. Nice work if you can get it!
 

Rickson9

Gold Contributor
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
101%
Sep 4, 2010
1,682
1,699
Canada
Phil Grande did a great segment on his show today (10.20.10) explaining how Buffet (Berkshire et. al.) bundled the toxic mortgage tranches and sold them into the market place as investment grade assets (SIVs). He then bought Goldmans Sachs on their inevitable swoon. In effect, Buffet played them both.

Love it how the rubes fawn on his 'great investing' yet seem to gloss over his financial warfare tactics. Nice work if you can get it!

Investing is war - financial competition. And Buffett is arguably the best. The emotionally weak never see their money again.

Do you think a company likes the fact that investors like Buffett come in during a market panic to buy them at pennies on the dollar? Or offer them 'salvation' in exchange for eternal bondage? Do you think current U.S. property owners like the fact that investors are buying their homes in short sale/foreclosure/auction for 70-90% than what they paid?

If investing wasn't cutthroat it would be called 'vacation'. Only those outside of investing would think that it was otherwise.

Buffett is the financial equivalent of Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan and Timur the Lame all rolled into one. Just because sophisticated investors don't say it doesn't mean that they don't know it. They know it. And they love it.

Don't hate the player. Hate the game.

All the best and godspeed!
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Forza

New Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
1%
Mar 14, 2008
212
3
Gold is tied to cash as well as it's abundance. The more gold there is flowing around, the less value it has. If the U.S. sold off all the gold in Fort Knox, gold would be worth practically nothing because of too much of it being in circulation. So, gold is dependent on how much of it is sold off to countries and individuals. It's also tied to currencies since when people feel like their national currency isn't safe, they will tend to buy more gold because they view gold as actually having real world value whereas national currencies are just pieces of paper whose value is determined by public perception and how much is in circulation. Now, due to the global economic recession, gold prices have skyrocketed but they won't stay that way for long; as the global economy recovers, gold prices will fall relative to strong currencies like the dollar, euro, pound, etc.

How do the experts accurately calculate the tipping point when there is too much gold flowing around?


"You could take all the gold that's ever been mined, and it would fill a cube 67 feet in each direction. For what that's worth at current gold prices, you could buy all - not some - all of the farmland in the United States. Plus, you could buy 10 Exxon Mobils, plus have $1 trillion of walking-around money. Or you could have a big cube of metal. Which would you take? Which is going to produce more value?"

If the production of value is the key factor in determining value, then gold's intrinsic value must be very very low, and investing in gold is almost always speculation.
 

Rickson9

Gold Contributor
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
101%
Sep 4, 2010
1,682
1,699
Canada
If the production of value is the key factor in determining value, then gold's intrinsic value must be very very low, and investing in gold is almost always speculation.

You are correct that that is the opinion of some investors.

Best regards!
 

Darkside

Bronze Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
18%
Jul 4, 2010
782
139
San Diego
How do the experts accurately calculate the tipping point when there is too much gold flowing around?

I'm not an expert on the subject but I assume it works something like how monetary inflation works. If the FED prints a trillion dollars and injects it into the economy, the effects won't be felt immediately but within a few months the dollar will be inflated as that infused cash is spread around first by banks giving out loans to businesses who spend that money to make more money and that money ends up in the hands of consumers who go out and spend it causing the dollar to inflate.

Similarly, when gold is valued very highly like it is right now, businesses and people who own gold tend to sell a lot of their gold which means that there is a lot more gold in circulation now than there was ten years ago when people were holding on tightly to their gold, waiting for the price of it to increase.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

ramy98

New Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
8%
Sep 1, 2007
205
17
Florida
Probably a good bet to have a portfolio that includes some PMs.. Just for insurance purposes.
 

max momo

Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
17%
Mar 15, 2008
197
34
California
Actually, the Price of Production served as the generational price support, at US$252 and $255 price per ounce in 1999 and 2001 respectively. $252 was the cost of the average large miner to extract and pour one ounce of bullion (dore). The smart money saw this and began accumulating at that price point. Gold mines do NOT have a history over the past 5,000 years of going out of business b.c. nobody wants their product.

Guess when the last audit of Fort Knox gold was....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1964!

and some folks still believe it's there!!!
 

KevMoDee

New Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
31%
Apr 13, 2010
42
13
Scottsdale, AZ
I think when you have conversations about gold, one needs to distinguish between the two major economic theories, those being Keynesian and Austrian economics. In a nutshell, the foundation of our current system is Keynesianism and is rooted in paper money and centralized control over interest rates and money supply. Austrian economics is rooted in hard money (gold and silver) and the free market dictates interest rates and supply.

We are currently in the death throws of Keyensianism and our currency is being debased at a record pace (as reflected in gold/silver prices). In the presence of a Fed policy of continued quantitative easing (money printing) which was declared again a few days ago by Bernanke, there can be little doubt as to the eventual results: inflation.

Another important distinction to make here is between "inflation" and "deflation". These terms should be reserved exclusively for what happens to a country's money supply, and not asset class prices. Otherwise you'll hear people bickering over apples and oranges. When a country's central banker basically says they are committing to a policy of quantitative easing, he's saying that they are committing to an inflationary strategy which will inevitably attack the value of the dollar. It's great to hear that the stock market is going up, or the value of homes are stabilizing, but when you price these asset classes in gold, both are continuing their decline in value.

When you don't take a closer look at what the value of your investments are denominated in, you are really missing the big picture. Gold is portable, rare, divisible, and has been considered "money" for 5000 years. I think the longest a paper based currency backed by nothing (fiat) has survived has been around 35 yrs. Since severing the dollar's ties with gold in 1971 via Nixon, we're on about year 39 right now (uncharted territory). Regardless of denomination, each dollar created costs the fed about 6 cents. and only something like 5 percent of dollars exist in physical form. The rest exist on ledgers in computer systems. Plus, reflecting on world history, governments have a nasty tendency of inflating away people's savings.

So the real question becomes, where do you feel safe keeping your money? If you think that the U.S. is some specially chosen country not tied to the laws of economics, I'm afraid you will be in for a rude awakening in the very near future. You can claim gold is overvalued all day long, but to tell people that they should sell their gold and move back into the dollar is like telling them to get out of the life boat and hold onto that plank of wood adrift in the ocean.

We live in fascinating times right now, and I'm afraid we are seeing what has happened thousands of times before (within the US included) playing out before our eyes.

A good resource for those interested in economic theory, check out Ludwig von Mises Institute - Homepage. I have no affiliation with this site.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

CommonCents

Silver Contributor
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
69%
Apr 14, 2009
1,167
810
MN
Phil Grande did a great segment on his show today (10.20.10) explaining how Buffet (Berkshire et. al.) bundled the toxic mortgage tranches and sold them into the market place as investment grade assets (SIVs). He then bought Goldmans Sachs on their inevitable swoon. In effect, Buffet played them both.

Love it how the rubes fawn on his 'great investing' yet seem to gloss over his financial warfare tactics. Nice work if you can get it!

Buffet's greatest talent? investing? nope. its PR, managing his image. Buffett is a ruthless hedge fund manager, not some old school grandpa that helps people out. He doesn't do derivatives? LOL, yeah right. More power to him for being successful but it makes me laugh about he is some jolly old grandpa. People are glad to sell to him at fire sale prices and he is a jolly hero instead of some market vulture or corporate raider. If he had that image he wouldn't last as long as he has. He is dumb as a fox. Kinda like Columbo of wall street.

Buffett, the brand, is the key to his long term success.
 

Forza

New Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
1%
Mar 14, 2008
212
3
The value of gold may continue inflating to the sky, but if bankruptcy occurs, do we really want our networth in something that someone else has complete control over? How is anyone meant to get access to it if the government decides to restrict access, or the entire system goes kaput?
 

Darkside

Bronze Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
18%
Jul 4, 2010
782
139
San Diego
Buffet's greatest talent? investing? nope. its PR, managing his image. Buffett is a ruthless hedge fund manager, not some old school grandpa that helps people out. He doesn't do derivatives? LOL, yeah right. More power to him for being successful but it makes me laugh about he is some jolly old grandpa. People are glad to sell to him at fire sale prices and he is a jolly hero instead of some market vulture or corporate raider. If he had that image he wouldn't last as long as he has. He is dumb as a fox. Kinda like Columbo of wall street.

Buffett, the brand, is the key to his long term success.


While I don't believe that he's the genius everyone thinks he is, I do believe that Warren Buffett is very clever. I don't throw around the word genius loosely(even Bill Gates wouldn't qualify for that term). Geniuses are people like Einstein or Isaac Newton or DaVinci; people who can understand things that ordinary people could never grasp even if they spent hundreds of years trying to solve the problem.

Bill Gates just lucked out in being one of the few teenagers in the world with access to a computer in the 1960s which gave him a head start in developing his software; if he had to compete against current odds he probably wouldn't have been a success as some other nerd in a high school somewhere would have created the same software.

Warren Buffett isn't a genius but he isn't an idiot either. I'd say he's above average intelligence, somewhere around a 115-130 IQ; geniuses are 145 and above and people like Einstein and Leonardo DaVinci are 200+ IQ(estimations ofcourse since DaVinci was never tested for his IQ).

What made Buffett so successful was gathering together lots of information on the future forecast of a particular industry and if he believed that an industry would do well in the future he would buy a smaller company at a very low price, in some ways cheating the business owner out of the true value of his or her company and then holding onto that company for decades until it became very valuable.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Darkside

Bronze Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
18%
Jul 4, 2010
782
139
San Diego
The value of gold may continue inflating to the sky, but if bankruptcy occurs, do we really want our networth in something that someone else has complete control over? How is anyone meant to get access to it if the government decides to restrict access, or the entire system goes kaput?



True. The government has seized the gold of Americans during the Great Depression so what's to stop them from doing the same thing again? I wouldn't feel safe having all of my assets in gold. I'd rather spread my money around in various safe companies. People tend to view the stock market as unsafe but really it's only dangerous if you or your investment firm are investing in newer companies or bets against currencies, markets, etc. I would feel perfectly safe investing money in companies like CocaCola, WalMart, Exxon, etc. Companies like that don't take huge risks so there stock prices never fall more than a few points. I might not make a lot of money investing in those companies but at least I could go to sleep at night knowing that my money was safe. You could then use a smaller percentage of your money to make more risky investments like 10% or 20%, while the other 80% or 90% was invested in safer companies.
 

Darkside

Bronze Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
18%
Jul 4, 2010
782
139
San Diego
I think when you have conversations about gold, one needs to distinguish between the two major economic theories, those being Keynesian and Austrian economics. In a nutshell, the foundation of our current system is Keynesianism and is rooted in paper money and centralized control over interest rates and money supply. Austrian economics is rooted in hard money (gold and silver) and the free market dictates interest rates and supply.

We are currently in the death throws of Keyensianism and our currency is being debased at a record pace (as reflected in gold/silver prices). In the presence of a Fed policy of continued quantitative easing (money printing) which was declared again a few days ago by Bernanke, there can be little doubt as to the eventual results: inflation.

Another important distinction to make here is between "inflation" and "deflation". These terms should be reserved exclusively for what happens to a country's money supply, and not asset class prices. Otherwise you'll hear people bickering over apples and oranges. When a country's central banker basically says they are committing to a policy of quantitative easing, he's saying that they are committing to an inflationary strategy which will inevitably attack the value of the dollar. It's great to hear that the stock market is going up, or the value of homes are stabilizing, but when you price these asset classes in gold, both are continuing their decline in value.

When you don't take a closer look at what the value of your investments are denominated in, you are really missing the big picture. Gold is portable, rare, divisible, and has been considered "money" for 5000 years. I think the longest a paper based currency backed by nothing (fiat) has survived has been around 35 yrs. Since severing the dollar's ties with gold in 1971 via Nixon, we're on about year 39 right now (uncharted territory). Regardless of denomination, each dollar created costs the fed about 6 cents. and only something like 5 percent of dollars exist in physical form. The rest exist on ledgers in computer systems. Plus, reflecting on world history, governments have a nasty tendency of inflating away people's savings.

So the real question becomes, where do you feel safe keeping your money? If you think that the U.S. is some specially chosen country not tied to the laws of economics, I'm afraid you will be in for a rude awakening in the very near future. You can claim gold is overvalued all day long, but to tell people that they should sell their gold and move back into the dollar is like telling them to get out of the life boat and hold onto that plank of wood adrift in the ocean.

We live in fascinating times right now, and I'm afraid we are seeing what has happened thousands of times before (within the US included) playing out before our eyes.

A good resource for those interested in economic theory, check out Ludwig von Mises Institute - Homepage. I have no affiliation with this site.


Great post but I disagree with the bolded part. You don't have to sell your gold and hold onto dollars. If I had lots of gold right now I'd sell it and invest in companies. Gold will not stay this high priced for long; historically it's gone up and down and now it's at the highest it's ever been so it's smart to sell before the price comes down.
 

hakrjak

Bronze Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
7%
Sep 15, 2007
1,887
127
Colorado Springs
Once you have lived through a few bubbles, you can recognize them with ease. Warren Buffet has lived through more bubbles than any of us on this board (I don't think we have any 80 yr old investors here do we?)

Gold is over, or soon to be over. You can try to justify buying it at these levels, but you'll end up sounding like the stock analysts that tried to justify us buying Internet stocks for 100X earnings, or Real Estate brokers that told us that you should buy houses for 10x your salary, because they would keep going up.

I had some gold eagles given to me in the 90's back when Gold was $350 an ounce, and I sold them all this month. Gotta love a $1000 profit, but time to not be greedy ;)

Cheers,

- Hakrjak
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Darkside

Bronze Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
18%
Jul 4, 2010
782
139
San Diego
Once you have lived through a few bubbles, you can recognize them with ease. Warren Buffet has lived through more bubbles than any of us on this board (I don't think we have any 80 yr old investors here do we?)

Gold is over, or soon to be over. You can try to justify buying it at these levels, but you'll end up sounding like the stock analysts that tried to justify us buying Internet stocks for 100X earnings, or Real Estate brokers that told us that you should buy houses for 10x your salary, because they would keep going up.

I had some gold eagles given to me in the 90's back when Gold was $350 an ounce, and I sold them all this month. Gotta love a $1000 profit, but time to not be greedy ;)

Cheers,

- Hakrjak



Yes. I suggest everyone here who has gold sell now before it's too late. You're deluding yourself if you think gold will stay high forever; it will come down and when it does you will lose money.
 

hakrjak

Bronze Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
7%
Sep 15, 2007
1,887
127
Colorado Springs
My point was -- if you analyze something long enough, you can talk yourself into anything. Consider taking a more basic approach.

Another thing to consider -- the stock market seems to be kicking off another bull market. Do you want to be stuck in precious metals when everybody pulls their money out, and goes back into stocks? Joe Sixpack isn't in yet, but you can bet he will be. He always joins the bull market 80% of the way through a rally, and he'll end up losing his shirt again, and again, and again.... Just like the people jumping into Gold at these levels -- whoa, what a concept! ;)

- Hakrjak :coffee:
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Forza

New Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
1%
Mar 14, 2008
212
3
Gold's gonna go up for 5 more years at least! That's my speculative prediction :p
 

tchandy

Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
20%
Aug 16, 2007
456
92
Kansas, for now

CommonCents

Silver Contributor
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
69%
Apr 14, 2009
1,167
810
MN
Stocks have had quite a bit of ramping up in anticipation of QE2. Not sure how much is baked in already but it is a significant portion. Buy the rumor, sell the fact. I think we are getting a pre-election sucker rally.

The focus is on a narrower and narrower list.

The attached liquidity analysis by Abel-Noser indicates that the US stock market has now become a concentrated pool in which just the top 99 stocks account for 50.09 percent of total domestic trading volume. In June, the top 20 stocks accounted for 28.94 percent of all domestic volume, an increase of 2.2 percent over May's 26.7 percent and yet again another record!
optionmonster.com

Something has to be done about high frequency trading soon. Or we are going to get several more flash crashes of higher severity. HFT was reported by a couple sources to be 70% of trading volume. Stunning. Quote stuffing is another threat to the market. HFT traders claim to tighten spreads but not when they can quote stuff, (submit thousands of orders a second and pull them before any get executed) to influence prices significantly one way or the other.

It would be like getting in a ring w/ a pro boxer that can move/hit 10x faster than you. You will hit him only when he wants you to. More and more people will learn to not get into the ring as outflows of capital have been consistent, well except for the recent report! Looks like the public is getting enticed to get long again. Not good news.

NEW YORK, Oct 20 (Reuters) - U.S. equity mutual funds took
in net new cash of $830 million in the week ended Oct. 13, the
first time investors have put in more than they have taken out
since the week ended April 28, the Investment Company Institute
data showed on Wednesday.

Ol' Grandpa Buffett needs quite a few new investors to sell his holdings to ;)
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
G

Guest3722A

Guest
HFT traders claim to tighten spreads

Ha! There's a good one.

Yeah they tighten spreads when they sub penny existing liquid orders which eventually is gonna pull the liquidity providers out of the game because if you take liquidity without giving the bot an idea of where you want to position, the machine has no point to position off of.

What strikes me as interesting too is how the HFTs are allowed to sub-penny but joe common isn't.

What's up with that?
 

whiteeclipse

New Contributor
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
11%
May 9, 2013
104
11
39
Orlando, FL

Post New Topic

Please SEARCH before posting.
Please select the BEST category.

Post new topic

Guest post submissions offered HERE.

Latest Posts

New Topics

Fastlane Insiders

View the forum AD FREE.
Private, unindexed content
Detailed process/execution threads
Ideas needing execution, more!

Join Fastlane Insiders.

Top