That's a way to see it.
I judge people by their results. I'm not very familiar with Hill's personal life. I know actually few facts about it.
But when you teach someone about getting rich, you should be rich yourself. Not by teaching, but by actually applying the concepts.
I like NH. I'm not just sold out on his ideas.
If someone teaches me about becoming a great boxer, I want that person to actually be a great boxer, not a researcher of great boxers.
And everyone defines success in his own way.
As far as I'm concerned, Viktor Frankl who wrote Man's Search for Meaning is a far more successful person than Hill was.
Why?
Because he spent a couple of years in a extermination camp and lived to tell about it. Because he gave birth to the idea of logotherapy. Because he actually used the lessons taught in his book to survive.
I'm not aware why NH didn't achieved financial success (or lost his money). I've heard that his pursuit for knowledge ruined almost every other part of his life. I've also heard that he was more focused on teaching people how to get out of the recession than to watch his own interests.
It doesn't really matter.
Here are the ideas with which I disagree:
1. Positive Mental Attitude - Yes, a positive mental attitude is good but it doesn't really matter if you are a positive person when your house burns down. My dearest mentor told me once "I've seen grumpy rich people and I've seen happy rich people. No matter how you are, optimistic or pessimistic, keep working until you get results"
2. Visualization. Sorry, but no matter how cool is to visualize, this doesn't work for me. Every time I visualize I waste time and I do nothing that day. I'd rather write down my thoughts or express them in any other way (drawing, painting, writing a story) than to visualize.
I hate gurus and I hate absolute truths. No one is 100% right. Not MJ, not NH, not Tony Robbins, no one. For all I'm concerned, I want to take the good parts from everyone in particular and ignore the bad ones.
For example, MJ wrote a great book. But it's still a commercial book. It makes it look to easy to get rich. It's not.
NH gave the perfect principles about having a fulfilling and successful life. But when it comes to the financial side, I'm a little skeptical about using what he told me. I've read TAGR several times and I've listened to the 30 minutes version over 100 times for 100 days in a row.
Tony Robbins is a cool guy but he forgets one thing - the dark side in all of us. It would be fun to get motivated and hyped up as he tries to induce in us ... but in the real world, following his advice to the key is difficult. This didn't stopped me to study him for a long while.
Earl Nightingale from what I can say is the best. He says it as it is. But his material is very outdated and many of his materials (with the exception of the strangest secret) apply to a certain cultural climate.
Dan Pena ... well, he was rich, I don't know how rich he is anymore. If you want to get rich, study Pena. But you'll trade your wife, kids, life for money. Not a good deal.
Jim Rohn ... I like this guy but I never realized what he actually does. He's a motivational speaker. (He was, may God rest his soul). So what? What are his results? Why is he qualified to teach me about money (actually, he doesn't teach a lot about money but rather a framework for living). Anyway, he's one on my favorite side.
Chris Howard ... I've learned NLP from this guy. I have nothing bad to say about him. If you want to learn NLP, he can help you.
T Harv Eker ... If I were 60 and with an IQ of 100, maybe I would like him. I've lost my time watching "The Seminar of the Century". 60 minutes (first DVD only) that I'll never get back.
Zig Ziglair ... I like him but I don't like his near obsession to religion. I am a faithful person but my relationship with God is personal. I don't want to hear about Him on every page, on every principle, in every product.
And many more. I've read a lot. Some for pleasure, some for necessity. Therefore I've developed a critical eye when reading.
Razvan
I judge people by their results. I'm not very familiar with Hill's personal life. I know actually few facts about it.
But when you teach someone about getting rich, you should be rich yourself. Not by teaching, but by actually applying the concepts.
I like NH. I'm not just sold out on his ideas.
If someone teaches me about becoming a great boxer, I want that person to actually be a great boxer, not a researcher of great boxers.
And everyone defines success in his own way.
As far as I'm concerned, Viktor Frankl who wrote Man's Search for Meaning is a far more successful person than Hill was.
Why?
Because he spent a couple of years in a extermination camp and lived to tell about it. Because he gave birth to the idea of logotherapy. Because he actually used the lessons taught in his book to survive.
I'm not aware why NH didn't achieved financial success (or lost his money). I've heard that his pursuit for knowledge ruined almost every other part of his life. I've also heard that he was more focused on teaching people how to get out of the recession than to watch his own interests.
It doesn't really matter.
Here are the ideas with which I disagree:
1. Positive Mental Attitude - Yes, a positive mental attitude is good but it doesn't really matter if you are a positive person when your house burns down. My dearest mentor told me once "I've seen grumpy rich people and I've seen happy rich people. No matter how you are, optimistic or pessimistic, keep working until you get results"
2. Visualization. Sorry, but no matter how cool is to visualize, this doesn't work for me. Every time I visualize I waste time and I do nothing that day. I'd rather write down my thoughts or express them in any other way (drawing, painting, writing a story) than to visualize.
I hate gurus and I hate absolute truths. No one is 100% right. Not MJ, not NH, not Tony Robbins, no one. For all I'm concerned, I want to take the good parts from everyone in particular and ignore the bad ones.
For example, MJ wrote a great book. But it's still a commercial book. It makes it look to easy to get rich. It's not.
NH gave the perfect principles about having a fulfilling and successful life. But when it comes to the financial side, I'm a little skeptical about using what he told me. I've read TAGR several times and I've listened to the 30 minutes version over 100 times for 100 days in a row.
Tony Robbins is a cool guy but he forgets one thing - the dark side in all of us. It would be fun to get motivated and hyped up as he tries to induce in us ... but in the real world, following his advice to the key is difficult. This didn't stopped me to study him for a long while.
Earl Nightingale from what I can say is the best. He says it as it is. But his material is very outdated and many of his materials (with the exception of the strangest secret) apply to a certain cultural climate.
Dan Pena ... well, he was rich, I don't know how rich he is anymore. If you want to get rich, study Pena. But you'll trade your wife, kids, life for money. Not a good deal.
Jim Rohn ... I like this guy but I never realized what he actually does. He's a motivational speaker. (He was, may God rest his soul). So what? What are his results? Why is he qualified to teach me about money (actually, he doesn't teach a lot about money but rather a framework for living). Anyway, he's one on my favorite side.
Chris Howard ... I've learned NLP from this guy. I have nothing bad to say about him. If you want to learn NLP, he can help you.
T Harv Eker ... If I were 60 and with an IQ of 100, maybe I would like him. I've lost my time watching "The Seminar of the Century". 60 minutes (first DVD only) that I'll never get back.
Zig Ziglair ... I like him but I don't like his near obsession to religion. I am a faithful person but my relationship with God is personal. I don't want to hear about Him on every page, on every principle, in every product.
And many more. I've read a lot. Some for pleasure, some for necessity. Therefore I've developed a critical eye when reading.
Razvan
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.