The Entrepreneur Forum | Startups | Entrepreneurship | Starting a Business | Motivation | Success
  • Join 50,000+ entrepreneurs who are earning their freedom and living their dream.

    "Fastlane" is an entrepreneur discussion forum based on The Unscripted Entrepreneurial Framework (TUNEF) outlined in the two best-selling books by MJ DeMarco (The Millionaire Fastlane and UNSCRIPTED™). From multimillionaires to digital nomads, the forum features real entrepreneurs creating real businesses.

    Download (Unscripted) Download (Millionaire Fastlane) Register
    Registering for the forum removes this block.

OFF-TOPIC Amazon announce min. hourly wage raise to $15

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
Yep. Now that they’ve done it, how much do you want to bet that they start lobbying for it to be mandatory to hurt the competition? They already ride out selling a lot of items below cost, they’ve pushed the razor thin margins on to the smaller proprietors, and now they want to go a step further to crush competition.

The other thread talking about Amazon being a monopoly, I’d say this is one of those counter intuitive, crony capitalist, moves that will shake out better for them despite doubling their cost of their workforce. It is looking more like a monopoly today, than when that thread started. Is a monopoly necessarily bad? No. But the government, ignorantly playing that game, is wildly bad business policy. It’s all desssed up in a pretty bow. “Higher minimum wage, workers rights, YAY!”

Honestly, in this business environment, it’s what I would do.

I’m interested in what @Vigilante thinks about this.
 
Last edited:

MTEE1985

Gold Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
Speedway Pass
Jun 12, 2018
526
1,769
548
Arizona
Yep. Now that they’ve done it, how much do you want to bet that they start lobbying for it to be mandatory to hurt the competition? They already ride out selling a lot of items below cost, they’ve pushed the razor thin margins on to the smaller proprietors, and now they want to go a step further to crush competition.

The other thread talking about Amazon being a monopoly, I’d say this is one of those counter intuitive, crony capitalist, moves that will shake out better for them despite doubling their cost of their workforce. It is looking more like a monopoly today, than when that thread started. Is a monopoly necessarily bad? No. But using the government to crush competition is bad for business and the consumer. It’s all desssed up in a pretty bow. “Higher minimum wage, workers rights, YAY!”

I’m interested in what @Vigilante thinks about this.
If I’m not mistaken Amazon says in the article here and in the WSJ that they have already begun the lobbying process. All in an attempt to look like a champion of the people.

I think it’s brilliant, now, with or without congressional action, Target and Walmart look like the bad guys while Amazon is “pro-employee” the biggest question I see now is when they inevitably follow suit do all three simply pass the cost on to the consumer, at which point the cry will be that $15/hour is not enough and now they want $20.
 

Jaden Jones

Igloo Builder
FASTLANE INSIDER
Speedway Pass
Aug 22, 2018
230
275
171
Canada
The costs will just get past on to everyone else anyways. Look at examples like Seattle, where minimum wage went up, the big guys stayed around while the little guys got pushed out and the cost of living eventually goes up to compensate. Amazons prices will as well.
 

Merging Left

Silver Contributor
Speedway Pass
Jul 20, 2014
364
646
279
29
I think it’s brilliant, now, with or without congressional action, Target and Walmart look like the bad guys while Amazon is “pro-employee” the biggest question I see now is when they inevitably follow suit do all three simply pass the cost on to the consumer, at which point the cry will be that $15/hour is not enough and now they want $20.
This is not a new concept, by any means. Walmart has been lobbying for raising minimum wage for years for exactly this reason. I believe they pay $11/hour. So it's not as great as Amazon, but that's still a far cry from making Walmart look like the bad guy. No, this makes the mom and pop shops look like the bad guy. Why support local businesses when they don't even support their employees?
 

GSF

Silver Contributor
Speedway Pass
Aug 25, 2012
269
734
292
Yep. Now that they’ve done it, how much do you want to bet that they start lobbying for it to be mandatory to hurt the competition? They already ride out selling a lot of items below cost, they’ve pushed the razor thin margins on to the smaller proprietors, and now they want to go a step further to crush competition.

The other thread talking about Amazon being a monopoly, I’d say this is one of those counter intuitive, crony capitalist, moves that will shake out better for them despite doubling their cost of their workforce. It is looking more like a monopoly today, than when that thread started. Is a monopoly necessarily bad? No. But the government, ignorantly playing that game, is wildly bad business policy. It’s all desssed up in a pretty bow. “Higher minimum wage, workers rights, YAY!”

Honestly, in this business environment, it’s what I would do.

I’m interested in what @Vigilante thinks about this.
And then once they've raised the minimum wage for all their competition, amazon replaces all their own minimum wage labour force with robots lol.
 

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
And then once they've raised the minimum wage for all their competition, amazon replaces all their own minimum wage labour force with robots lol.
Dead on, then raise their “wages” to $25 and start the loop over.
 
Last edited:

The Abundant Man

Gold Contributor
Speedway Pass
I've Read UNSCRIPTED
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jul 3, 2018
1,337
1,852
552
Wouldn't this eventually cause inflation?

If you raise minimum raise then product cost would go up?
 

SquatchMan

Gold Contributor
Speedway Pass
Dec 27, 2016
449
1,607
468
Nowhere
If I’m not mistaken Amazon says in the article here and in the WSJ that they have already begun the lobbying process. All in an attempt to look like a champion of the people.

I think it’s brilliant, now, with or without congressional action, Target and Walmart look like the bad guys while Amazon is “pro-employee” the biggest question I see now is when they inevitably follow suit do all three simply pass the cost on to the consumer, at which point the cry will be that $15/hour is not enough and now they want $20.
Wal-Mart and Target will pass the cost onto the consumer.

Amazon won't. "Your margin is my opportunity."

Remember, only 250,000 Amazon employees will have a wage increase. Wal-Mart has like 1 million people.

Yet again, Bezos outsmarts the competition. He probably turned The Washington Post into The Bezos Blog with this, and anti-trust, in mind.
 

MTEE1985

Gold Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
Speedway Pass
Jun 12, 2018
526
1,769
548
Arizona
Wouldn't this eventually cause inflation?

If you raise minimum raise then product cost would go up?
That’s the basic economics argument against higher minimum wage, universal incomes etc.

What’s interesting is they didn’t do some feel good .25 or .50 over their competition, they did 25-30% more. Logic says they will raise prices or charge more for FBA etc. OR as @Kak alluded to above, will they cut their margins and secondly, cut them long enough to put most everybody else out of business? At which point they can raise prices. At which point they then run the risk of then being considered a monopoly.
 

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
Wouldn't this eventually cause inflation?

If you raise minimum raise then product cost would go up?
Yes. On a macro level because of supply and demand, not directly because “they pass the price on the consumer” though some of that happens. On a micro level, this is more likely to cause companies to shed employees.

More money in people’s pockets equals more money spent monthly. When the supply “of money” is increased so is demand for what is purchased with it. Supply for those items is lessened relative to the demand, thus increasing prices everywhere, not just at Amazon or Walmart.

As a capitalist, I loathe any form of minimum wage laws. Labor should be an open and free market like everything else should be. But it isn’t... So... As a businessman, I applaud the tact, foresight and ability to navigate our actual business environment shown here.
 

MJ DeMarco

Raving Lunatic
Staff member
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
I've Read UNSCRIPTED
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jul 23, 2007
28,256
94,429
3,751
Phoenix, AZ
getUnscripted.com

Vigilante

Legendary Contributor
Staff member
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Oct 31, 2011
9,820
56,927
4,655
Gulf Coast
Yep. Now that they’ve done it, how much do you want to bet that they start lobbying for it to be mandatory to hurt the competition? They already ride out selling a lot of items below cost, they’ve pushed the razor thin margins on to the smaller proprietors, and now they want to go a step further to crush competition.

The other thread talking about Amazon being a monopoly, I’d say this is one of those counter intuitive, crony capitalist, moves that will shake out better for them despite doubling their cost of their workforce. It is looking more like a monopoly today, than when that thread started. Is a monopoly necessarily bad? No. But the government, ignorantly playing that game, is wildly bad business policy. It’s all desssed up in a pretty bow. “Higher minimum wage, workers rights, YAY!”

Honestly, in this business environment, it’s what I would do.

I’m interested in what @Vigilante thinks about this.
The city of Seattle tried to require Amazon to do this, and Amazon threatened to leave as a result.

How Amazon Killed Seattle's Head Tax - The Atlantic

Amazon continues to invest in automation, with a focus on EBITDA improvement. One of the largest variable costs is that of the employee. More machines equals less employees. If I were a gambler, I'd put money on Amazon cracking the whip on the automation of functions previously occupied by employees.

It's the same as fast food and other unskilled labor. The higher the labor costs, the more automation develops to take your order, flip your burger, and eliminate one of the larger variable costs. ‘It just makes sense’ to replace workers with machines, Jack in the Box CEO says

The net effect of Amazon's higher wages will be higher unemployment. Congratulations workers... you just went from $12 an hour to $0 an hour.

What I haven't figured out yet is how this plays into the feud between Bezos and Trump. But maybe this is even bigger than that. It's likely less about that, but more about casting off heat about being a monopoly. Now you become a champion for the people. Instead of being an enemy and a capitalist, now you are a social justice warrior, and all it really costs you was a few million dollars... a rounding error for Amazon.

The US Department of Labor said in their statement they think it will entice more people to work for Amazon. That presumes Amazon is hiring. Elisabeth Warren, a potential 2020 presidential candidate, has publicly called for Amazon to be broken up. The EU is already holding an antitrust investigation against Amazon.

If you believe what a former president of the United States said about industry... industry is essentially by the people and for the people. Bezos didn't build Amazon, some would muse. The people did, and were supported by the roads, the infrastructure, and even the backdrop of the internet Amazon doesn't own.

Amazon just played a card aimed at stemming the rising bile from the have nots. They just went from an enemy to a socialist darling, and probably bought themselves a few more years of unfettered growth in the process.

Who does this hurt the most?

......

WALMART.

Non-unionized, underpaid walmart workers. Walmart will now be put in a corner.

Amazon has 500,000 employees.

Walmart has 2.1m, of which 1,400,000 are in the US. Walmart has high fixed retail expenses, and you just potentially delivered the most significant blow to them from a SG&A standpoint in the history of Walmart. Amazon has warehouses. Walmart has 5,000 FIXED COST stores in the United States, and you literally just delivered a significant blow to how they operate their stores. Their labor cost is their single biggest expense and their largest variable expense, and overnight you just changed that by 20%.

From a Walmart standpoint this is a nightmare. Walmart's average full time wage is $13 and part time is $10. Walmart is screwed.
 

garyfritz

Silver Contributor
Summit Attendee
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jul 16, 2011
628
599
227
Colorado
As a capitalist, I loathe any form of minimum wage laws. Labor should be an open and free market like everything else should be. But it isn’t...
I understand your point. But IMHO some large companies are abusing their power in this situation. E.g. Walmart pays starvation wages because they CAN -- because there are so many low-end workers desperate for a job, ANY job. Supply and demand. But they pay so little that their workers can't support themselves, and the workers end up on the public dole for food stamps, etc. Some people call this a "Walmart Tax" because the Walmart workers' drain on the system roughly equals Walmart's profits. Our taxes pay the welfare, enabling Walmart to pay lower wages, so it's effectively an income redistribution from everyone to Walmart. And IMHO that's wrong. Just like a company shouldn't be allowed to dump toxic wastes, forcing everyone else to clean it up, they shouldn't be allowed to dump their financial issues onto the public either.
 

garyfritz

Silver Contributor
Summit Attendee
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jul 16, 2011
628
599
227
Colorado
Amazon continues to invest in automation, with a focus on EBITDA improvement. One of the largest variable costs is that of the employee. More machines equals less employees.
It's the same as fast food and other unskilled labor.
Yes, and it will only accelerate. We as a society need to recognize and plan for the fact that, sooner than you might expect, automation will take over a large percentage of formerly-human jobs. The lower-end, less-challenging jobs (fast food jobs, janitors, etc) are the low-hanging fruit for automation. Unfortunately, the sad reality is that a large portion of society is really only able to hold down those less-challenging jobs. They may be perfectly lovely people but they're not rocket scientists and they can't retrain to IT jobs. Fairly soon there will not BE any jobs that those people can handle. A large percentage of the population will become UN-employable. That's a recipe for (even more) political unrest. And of course our government is utterly clueless and is not thinking about this at all.

I'm not sure where the entrepreneurial opportunities will be in that environment. I assume we will have to extend the welfare system to a "guaranteed income" solution, otherwise we'll have 10's of millions of people starving on the streets. Once those people have a living wage, then there will be demand for entertainment to keep them from going crazy and burning the place down, but that's a long way down the road.
 

bilkar1985

Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
I've Read UNSCRIPTED
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Sep 4, 2018
64
77
126
33
Greece
I'm not sure where the entrepreneurial opportunities will be in that environment. I assume we will have to extend the welfare system to a "guaranteed income" solution, otherwise, we'll have 10's of millions of people starving on the streets. Once those people have a living wage, then there will be a demand for entertainment to keep them from going crazy and burning the place down, but that's a long way down the road.
If there is a "guaranteed income" why would someone work then? Who would work if he would be sure that every month he doesn't have to worry about anything? It will be like having a ton of employees in your society, sitting around and behaving like Unscripted (correct me if I am wrong) in the worst way (loans, reckless lives etc.)
Work would be carried out only by the ones' who want to be helpful to the society. But until when is this system feasible (if it is at all)? Sooner or later one (and more) of those who sit their a$$*s in order to produce wealth and contribute to the wellbeing of this "society" will revolt and say; "Basta!" I am working and you are not, yet you eat, drink and have fun no matter what." And this will be an even bigger problem.

Evolution in its' self is survival of the fittest after all. In ancient times it was the mascular, Conan-type guys and as we move towards the "4th revolution" I see a "Nerds strike back" scenario.

As always, those who can adapt (socially, financially etc.) will those who will manage to survive in the end.
 

lewj24

Gold Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
Speedway Pass
May 12, 2016
366
1,293
423
24
St. Louis, MO
The other thread talking about Amazon being a monopoly, I’d say this is one of those counter intuitive, crony capitalist, moves that will shake out better for them despite doubling their cost of their workforce. It is looking more like a monopoly today, than when that thread started. Is a monopoly necessarily bad? No. But the government, ignorantly playing that game, is wildly bad business policy. It’s all desssed up in a pretty bow. “Higher minimum wage, workers rights, YAY!”
Yes this would be bad. Monopolies created because of government laws are horrible for everyone except the owners of the monopoly. If Amazon was a "natural" monopoly in a free market that would be ok. This is bad.
 

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
Yes this would be bad. Monopolies created because of government laws are horrible for everyone except the owners of the monopoly. If Amazon was a "natural" monopoly in a free market that would be ok. This is bad.
Re-read my post.
 

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
I understand your point. But IMHO some large companies are abusing their power in this situation. E.g. Walmart pays starvation wages because they CAN -- because there are so many low-end workers desperate for a job, ANY job. Supply and demand. But they pay so little that their workers can't support themselves, and the workers end up on the public dole for food stamps, etc. Some people call this a "Walmart Tax" because the Walmart workers' drain on the system roughly equals Walmart's profits. Our taxes pay the welfare, enabling Walmart to pay lower wages, so it's effectively an income redistribution from everyone to Walmart. And IMHO that's wrong. Just like a company shouldn't be allowed to dump toxic wastes, forcing everyone else to clean it up, they shouldn't be allowed to dump their financial issues onto the public either.
The whole, subsizing Walmart argument is a bunch of left wing propaganda. Starvation wages? Really?

You are absolutely right they pay the wages they pay because they can. So? Every single person in that store applied for that job, interviewed for it, wanted it, and accepted the terms. Too bad.

There is a market for jobs that do NOT pay all the bills a household could incur. Let me repeat that... there is a MARKET to WILLINGLY ACCEPT jobs that wouldn’t pay all the household bills. Why? Because there are also high school kids “subsidized” by their parents. There are people who want to work in retirement. There are people that want to help out their higher earning spouse financially. LOTS of scenarios that support the MARKET for these jobs.

Gary, what you are saying is that these people don’t matter. Toss them in to higher competition marketplace battling over higher wage jobs, because well, they “deserve” more money. No they don’t. They deserve to be compensated for the amount they agreed upon. They deserve the right to EARN a better job.
 
Last edited:

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
Yes, and it will only accelerate. We as a society need to recognize and plan for the fact that, sooner than you might expect, automation will take over a large percentage of formerly-human jobs. The lower-end, less-challenging jobs (fast food jobs, janitors, etc) are the low-hanging fruit for automation. Unfortunately, the sad reality is that a large portion of society is really only able to hold down those less-challenging jobs. They may be perfectly lovely people but they're not rocket scientists and they can't retrain to IT jobs. Fairly soon there will not BE any jobs that those people can handle. A large percentage of the population will become UN-employable. That's a recipe for (even more) political unrest. And of course our government is utterly clueless and is not thinking about this at all.

I'm not sure where the entrepreneurial opportunities will be in that environment. I assume we will have to extend the welfare system to a "guaranteed income" solution, otherwise we'll have 10's of millions of people starving on the streets. Once those people have a living wage, then there will be demand for entertainment to keep them from going crazy and burning the place down, but that's a long way down the road.
Creative destruction equals the advancement of civilization. Your theory of mass unemployment due to creative destruction has been disproven for centuries. There will be opportunities, as long as the labor market remains open and people still want to consume. Isn’t that cool?
EA80F820-A256-4E5B-A05E-86545293558E.jpeg
 
Last edited:

garyfritz

Silver Contributor
Summit Attendee
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jul 16, 2011
628
599
227
Colorado
If there is a "guaranteed income" why would someone work then? Who would work if he would be sure that every month he doesn't have to worry about anything?
You're assuming there is an OPTION to work. Read my post again. Automation will take most/all of the low-end jobs -- it WILL happen at some point, unless banned by the government. (It's already happening to some jobs. How many telephone operators are there, or travel agents? How many fast-food workers have been replaced by kiosks? How many assembly-line workers work at the Tesla Gigafactory? Uber has already live-tested self-driving cars with paying customers.) Then you have to recognize that a significant segment of people can only DO low-end jobs. Some of them cannot retrain for non-automatable jobs. Eventually there will be NO JOBS left for those people. NONE. They will be UNABLE to work even if they desperately want to. They will be priced out of the labor market by cheaper and more reliable automation. There will be NO WAY for them to earn a living. NO WAY to pay for food or housing.

How do you think it would play out if society says "Tough beans, you're unnecessary now, just go starve quietly and don't bother the productive members of society" ? Answer: very, very badly. Major riots and anarchy.

"Guaranteed income" (in this endgame scenario at least) is not largesse or liberal-snowflake happy-think. It's a desperation defensive move to prevent large-scale revolt. It's not a pleasant alternative but it's cheaper than the other choice.
 

garyfritz

Silver Contributor
Summit Attendee
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jul 16, 2011
628
599
227
Colorado
There is a market for jobs that do NOT pay all the bills a household could incur. Let me repeat that... there is a MARKET to WILLINGLY ACCEPT jobs that wouldn’t pay all the household bills. Why? Because there are also high school kids “subsidized” by their parents. There are people who want to work in retirement.
I see and agree with your point. But IMHO this is an early symptom of the syndrome I described above. Many of the jobs at Walmart fit into those low-end jobs I described. There is already more competition for those jobs than supply. A lot of breadwinners take those jobs because they haven't found any better alternative. They're already starting to get squeezed out of the job market but they can't afford to do anything else. There's a lot of civil unrest fomenting around this issue already, and it will only get worse.
 

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
Automation will take most/all of the low-end jobs -- it WILL happen at some point, unless banned by the government.
No it won’t.
 

Kak

Capitalist Swine
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jan 23, 2011
5,146
19,393
4,004
I see and agree with your point. But IMHO this is an early symptom of the syndrome I described above. Many of the jobs at Walmart fit into those low-end jobs I described. There is already more competition for those jobs than supply. A lot of breadwinners take those jobs because they haven't found any better alternative. They're already starting to get squeezed out of the job market but they can't afford to do anything else. There's a lot of civil unrest fomenting around this issue already, and it will only get worse.
I don’t know where you are seeing this... We have LOW unemployment right now. Low underemployment.

A truly open and free labor market would leave not one willing worker unemployed. So I would continue to say that we could employ the rest of the 5 percent of whoever wants a job if we got rid of minimum wage.

But that isn’t going to happen, people who can’t think deeply enough into the issues are going to continue to tout government as the solution... worsening the problem.
 

garyfritz

Silver Contributor
Summit Attendee
Read Millionaire Fastlane
Jul 16, 2011
628
599
227
Colorado
No it won’t.
Why? How will bus drivers and truck drivers and (name your manual labor) escape the fate that **already** hit telephone operators, travel agents, elevator operators, etc?

The changes are happening. They're not likely to stop. Technology keeps marching on and it will change society as it always has.
 

FORUM SPONSOR

Post New Topic

Please SEARCH before posting.
Please select the BEST category.

Post thread…

Search the Forum

New Topics

FASTLANE INSIDERS

View the forum AD FREE.
Private, unindexed content
Detailed process/execution threads
Monthly conference calls with doers
Ideas needing execution, more!

Join Fastlane Insiders.

Top Bottom