- Thread starter
- #19
Good question, I just asked support. I know i'm feeding it whatever existing data is in the clients CRM and they have data from the other resellers in similar verticals as a baseline at least.If the purchase is indeed an online one, then how do you market for personal injury? Or are we tracking forms fill outs or something like that? Have access to call tracking data?
So many questions...
It wouldn't make sense that they're actually tracking everyone they have data resolution on 24/7 , I think you have to "zoom in" on someone before accessing it (so no way its tracking every bank account transfer to and from every lawyer in the country or something like that)
Do you have a better answer than I read a PDF in training class?
Well not really? as I don't live in california so I had no intentions on even bothering myself with it. So I never even opend the file but heres some choice pieces (the compliance section from wiki is the same)...
Do you do business or have customers (or potential customers) in California? If you answered yes to this question, and you meet one of the following criteria, your company must conform to CCPA regulations:
- Your annual gross revenue is more than $25 million.
- Your organization receives, shares, or sells personal information of more than 50,000 individuals.
- Your company earns 50% or more of its annual revenue from selling personal information of consumers.
So then compliance seems to just mean making it real clear and easy for people to opt out.
But then they still seem to be muddling through the difference between "publicy available information" and "private information" and of course where data that was provided by a consumer and data that was purchased by or acquired by a third party fits into things.
Key on that last part is the, essence I want to say? of the law would definitely seem to be saying that someone should have "data rights" so even if it was pre-existing third party collected data some remedy for expungement should exist. Still seems obscure on finer points though (pending clarifications)
I think wired did a great take on it
So now that i'm halfway informed my initial reaction of "don't do business in California' seems spot on. I maintain that I don't think this country has the public drive or political inclination to nationally enforce anything like this and states will wait to see if its a drag on california resources not worth the tradeoff before acting.
While all thats being bandied about and debated, I'll be over here making my FU money.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.