The Entrepreneur Forum | Financial Freedom | Starting a Business | Motivation | Money | Success

Welcome to the only entrepreneur forum dedicated to building life-changing wealth.

Build a Fastlane business. Earn real financial freedom. Join free.

Join over 80,000 entrepreneurs who have rejected the paradigm of mediocrity and said "NO!" to underpaid jobs, ascetic frugality, and suffocating savings rituals— learn how to build a Fastlane business that pays both freedom and lifestyle affluence.

Free registration at the forum removes this block.

If you import from China, this may be relevant.

Frank H.

Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
89%
Dec 22, 2018
90
80
This is another policy that makes my blood boil! I know that there are more important issues, however, this one is painful for my business. A friend and I did a lot of research on a niche and found ten products that we took risks on and made a lot of innovations on. We ordered many samples and it took us a lot of time and energy to innovate the products. Now we have to import from other countries because the labor costs are too expensive in North America.
 

Kak

Legendary Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
492%
Jan 23, 2011
9,666
47,540
34
Texas
This is raising taxes. Pure and simple.

Not sure why Republicans cheer him on and Democrats get mad. I am never in favor of the government seizing money out of the economy.

And for what? What is that money going to go to? Not American manufacturing jobs. Just the black hole.
 

AgainstAllOdds

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
647%
Dec 26, 2014
2,274
14,724
32
Chicago, IL
This is raising taxes. Pure and simple.

Not sure why Republicans cheer him on and Democrats get mad. I am never in favor of the government seizing money out of the economy.

And for what? What is that money going to go to? Not American manufacturing jobs. Just the black hole.

It's negotiation and game theory at its finest.

China wants to wait off closer to the election to figure out whether or not Trump is getting re-elected. Meanwhile Trump is forcing them to make a decision now. Either they take the deal that he's offering, or they risk being screwed for 5 more years assuming he wins in 2020.

Personally, I'm 100% behind the tariffs. China will cave before the U.S. (Trump) does.


An individual whose opinion I admire on the topic is Marty Davis from Cambria. Essentially, his main point is like all economists, that economics supports free trade. However, you cannot have free trade without fair trade (lack of subsidies, excess of government loans, free electricity, currency manipulation, etc.).

What Trump is doing is enforcing fair trade in order to allow for free trade. Tariffs are an enforcement tool, and Trump is using it as such.

These tariffs are really low risk, really high reward in terms of getting China to do what the U.S. wants.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Last edited:

AgainstAllOdds

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
647%
Dec 26, 2014
2,274
14,724
32
Chicago, IL
This is another policy that makes my blood boil! I know that there are more important issues, however, this one is painful for my business. A friend and I did a lot of research on a niche and found ten products that we took risks on and made a lot of innovations on. We ordered many samples and it took us a lot of time and energy to innovate the products. Now we have to import from other countries because the labor costs are too expensive in North America.

You've positioned yourself wrong.

In my business, the Trump tariffs are going to add around $100,000 in tariffs to machinery we want to import, and affect 15% of the products we're selling.

For the other 85%, we're going to kill it. Why? Because we built a business that's not reliant on China - especially when the president has week after week said that he's going to put tariffs on China. There's individuals that source solely from China... and now they're F*cked. Meanwhile we're going to bite away at their market share bit by bit until Trump takes away the tariffs.

Note: My take is that this is a phantom trade war. The 25% tariffs won't go into effect for long.

For your business: Ask yourself where everyone is buying from. If it's China, then your innovations will allow for a 25% revenue increase. If it's not China, then you better start searching for another supplier - and quick.
 

Walter Hay

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
401%
Sep 13, 2014
3,318
13,305
World citizen
You've positioned yourself wrong.

In my business, the Trump tariffs are going to add around $100,000 in tariffs to machinery we want to import, and affect 15% of the products we're selling.

For the other 85%, we're going to kill it. Why? Because we built a business that's not reliant on China - especially when the president has week after week said that he's going to put tariffs on China. There's individuals that source solely from China... and now they're F*cked. Meanwhile we're going to bite away at their market share bit by bit until Trump takes away the tariffs.

Note: My take is that this is a phantom trade war. The 25% tariffs won't go into effect for long.

For your business: Ask yourself where everyone is buying from. If it's China, then your innovations will allow for a 25% revenue increase. If it's not China, then you better start searching for another supplier - and quick.
@AgainstAllOdds I couldn't have said it better myself.

If I may be permitted to boast a little, I have been several years ahead of the game. My sourcing and importing book editions 2017, 2018 and 2019 have all promoted the desirability of sourcing from countries other than China, and provided genuine B2B links to many exporting countries.

Unfortunately, complacency and laziness have kept thousands wedded to China suppliers, and they are now paying the price.

I posted this in Oct. 22, 2014 in my AMA thread:
I have directed many people to other countries where they have been able to obtain better quality at the same price as in China, or sometimes they have bought similar quality but at a lower price. In some cases they have found unique products not produced in China.

Sourcing from China is easy, although many people get burnt for that very reason. They think it is so easy that they can be careless about sourcing. They treat it as casually as buying from their local store and they blindly accept everything they read on B2B sourcing sites.

Sourcing from other countries will require greater expertise, but I have taught many people how to do it. Those who do begin sourcing in other countries may well be one step ahead of the competition in a few years’ time.

Walter
 

AgainstAllOdds

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
647%
Dec 26, 2014
2,274
14,724
32
Chicago, IL
@AgainstAllOdds I couldn't have said it better myself.

If I may be permitted to boast a little, I have been several years ahead of the game. My sourcing and importing book editions 2017, 2018 and 2019 have all promoted the desirability of sourcing from countries other than China, and provided genuine B2B links to many exporting countries.

Unfortunately, complacency and laziness have kept thousands wedded to China suppliers, and they are now paying the price.

I posted this in Oct. 22, 2014 in my AMA thread:
I have directed many people to other countries where they have been able to obtain better quality at the same price as in China, or sometimes they have bought similar quality but at a lower price. In some cases they have found unique products not produced in China.

Sourcing from China is easy, although many people get burnt for that very reason. They think it is so easy that they can be careless about sourcing. They treat it as casually as buying from their local store and they blindly accept everything they read on B2B sourcing sites.

Sourcing from other countries will require greater expertise, but I have taught many people how to do it. Those who do begin sourcing in other countries may well be one step ahead of the competition in a few years’ time.

Walter

To build on that, sourcing from China is laughable without the tariffs.

The opportunities for most products aren't in China anymore. China's just "easy".

Take the tariffs away, and I can still source non-subsidized goods 20% cheaper outside of China.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Kak

Legendary Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
492%
Jan 23, 2011
9,666
47,540
34
Texas
It's negotiation and game theory at its finest.

China wants to wait off closer to the election to figure out whether or not Trump is getting re-elected. Meanwhile Trump is forcing them to make a decision now. Either they take the deal that he's offering, or they risk being screwed for 5 more years assuming he wins in 2020.

Personally, I'm 100% behind the tariffs. China will cave before the U.S. (Trump) does.


An individual whose opinion I admire on the topic is Marty Davis from Cambria. Essentially, his main point is like all economists, that economics supports free trade. However, you cannot have free trade without fair trade (lack of subsidies, excess of government loans, free electricity, currency manipulation, etc.).

What Trump is doing is enforcing fair trade in order to allow for free trade. Tariffs are an enforcement tool, and Trump is using it as such.

These tariffs are really low risk, really high reward in terms of getting China to do what the U.S. wants.

I understand that a lot of folks think that it is all about negotiation. It very well could be an exercise to make trade more free. If that is the case, ok. I fully agree with making trade more free.

The problem is, he hasn't explicitly said it because it would ruin his negotiating leverage.

Call me old fashioned, but I tend to believe the words that come flying out of a POTUS mouth with no teleprompter against his advisors' strong suggestions to tamp it down...

Trump shooting from the hip "I am a tariff man." Me listening "I guess he likes tariffs." Getting this elaborate negotiation narrative out of what he has said is putting words in his mouth.

Now there is a fork in the road here.

You either trust the government knows what is best for us.
-or-
Question it because they have given us every reason to.

I do know there is nothing as permanent as a temporary government program.

What do tariffs really do? They intentionally add 1:1 inneficencies to the supply chain of importers in order to "make domestic companies more competitive."

What is the ripple effect? They put US companies on the government tit. They aren't built to withstand global competition and they aren't forced to innovate or improve processes. Why? Because they don't have to. It stagnates growth of the very industries it is designed to help letting the rest of the world pull further and further ahead. Isolating us totally backfires.

If it is all a negotiating scheme... I will be happy to see all of this roll back to some very favorable terms of international trade.

In the interim. Tariffs are taxes and I am never going to believe direct government created inefficiencies are pro-business policy. It makes government richer at the direct expense of business.

By the way... For those of you wondering, yes I am a Trump supporter. My wife and I go to an event at his home once a year... This isn't coming from a "Never Trumper" or a Democrat.

I totally agree with @Walter Hay about how China is maturing and there is opportunity elsewhere. When I was primarily importing, it was out of Mexico.
 
Last edited:

MJ DeMarco

I followed the science; all I found was money.
Staff member
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
445%
Jul 23, 2007
38,025
169,150
Utah
I don't think China will cave.

The beauty of communism is all they have to do is be patient and wait for a new president, either D or R. That will be in 20 months or in 4 years. If they watch American news, they probably think the chances of DJT being reelected is slim and none. So why bother when they can just delay, delay, delay...
 

The-J

Dog Dad
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
264%
Aug 28, 2011
4,198
11,076
Ontario
Call me old fashioned, but I tend to believe the words that come flying out of a POTUS mouth with no teleprompter against his advisors' strong suggestions to tamp it down.

Trump shooting from the hip "I am a tariff man." Me listening "I guess he likes tariffs." Getting this elaborate negotiation narrative out of what he has said is putting words in his mouth.

Now there is a fork in the road here.

You either trust the government knows what is best for us.
-or-
Question it because they have given us every reason to.

I do know there is nothing as permanent as a temporary government program.

What do tariffs really do? They literally add 1:1 inneficencies to the supply chain of importers in order to "make domestic companies more competitive."

What is the ripple effect? They put US companies on the government tit. They aren't built to withstand global competition and they aren't forced to innovate or improve processes. Why? Because they dont have to. It stagnates growth of the very industries it is designed to help letting the rest of the world pull further and further ahead. Isolating us totally backfires.

If it is all a negotiating scheme... I will be happy to see all of this roll back to some very favorable terms of international trade.

In the interim. Tariffs are taxes and I am never going to believe direct government created inefficiencies are pro-business policy.

By the way... For those of you wondering, yes I am a Trump supporter. My wife and I go to an event at his home once a year... This isn't coming from a "Never Trumper" or a Democrat.

Rep+++ for being willing to say when the president/party you support is doing things that you disagree with and thus being consistent with what you actually believe.

Tariffs hurt businesses by raising costs, plain and simple. The proper response by US businesses is to find another place to source from, and the proper response by Chinese businesses is to find ways around the tariffs. They will, and they will.

Not saying that paying the 25% tariff is bad if you're unable to source from elsewhere and you can still make it work. If you can't, though, you're going to either find another sourcing country or you're going to have a bad time.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Kak

Legendary Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
492%
Jan 23, 2011
9,666
47,540
34
Texas
I filmed this video for the forum because I wanted to show an example of where value goes to die. What starts as a pretty lucrative deal becomes....


This is close in numbers to a deal was recently considering. The one thing I have made in China. The tariffs would have popped up during the production process. It would have already been in motion. I would have also had to carry nearly 50 grand of this gross deal for 120 days if everything went smoothly. For 6 grand that I would get to keep. This deal died on timing, the client drug feet on a down payment to the point where I wasn't comfortable with their delivery schedule... I am sure glad that happened.

That 25% doesn't sound like much, but it is HUGE when it is slapped right in the middle of a supply chain. My effective tax rate on this deal would have been 70%.

You get 6 thousand dollars for your hard work and risk.

The government gets 14 thousand because you'll go to jail if you don't.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted50669

Guest
I filmed this video for the forum because I wanted to show an example of where value goes to die. What starts as a pretty lucrative deal becomes....


This is close in numbers to a deal was recently considering. The one thing I have made in China. The tarrifs would have popped up during the production process. It would have already been in motion. I would have also had to carry nearly 50 grand of this gross deal for 120 days if everything went smoothly. For 6 grand that I would get to keep. This deal died on timing, the client drug feet on a down payment to the point where I wasn't comfortable with their delivery schedule... I am sure glad that happened.

That 25% doesn't sound like much, but it is HUGE when it is slapped right in the middle of a supply chain. My effective tax rate on this deal would have been 70%.
Holy shit, that's worse than the mob.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

AgainstAllOdds

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
647%
Dec 26, 2014
2,274
14,724
32
Chicago, IL
Getting this elaborate negotiation narrative out of what he has said is putting words in his mouth.

For me, one of the easiest ways to understand Trump was reading his books - especially The Art of the Deal.

He lays out exactly how he negotiates and thinks page by page. The negotiation narrative is aligned with his books, so I wouldn't call it "putting words in his mouth". He simply acts how he historically said he would act.
 

Ocean Man

Life-long learner.
FASTLANE INSIDER
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
222%
Sep 26, 2018
902
1,998
United States
I filmed this video for the forum because I wanted to show an example of where value goes to die. What starts as a pretty lucrative deal becomes....


This is close in numbers to a deal was recently considering. The one thing I have made in China. The tariffs would have popped up during the production process. It would have already been in motion. I would have also had to carry nearly 50 grand of this gross deal for 120 days if everything went smoothly. For 6 grand that I would get to keep. This deal died on timing, the client drug feet on a down payment to the point where I wasn't comfortable with their delivery schedule... I am sure glad that happened.

That 25% doesn't sound like much, but it is HUGE when it is slapped right in the middle of a supply chain. My effective tax rate on this deal would have been 70%.

Wow... Thanks for breaking it down @Kak. That's outrageous. $60,000 of value, what's your return? $6,000...
 

socaldude

Saturn Sedan and PT Cruiser enthusiast.
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
212%
Jan 10, 2012
2,374
5,036
San Diego, CA
The optimal strategy in game theory is always tit-for-tat.

At this point we are heading for a trade war.

Remember China is communist, I'm not entirely familiar with china but based off my experience the politics there are very machiavellian.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Kak

Legendary Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
492%
Jan 23, 2011
9,666
47,540
34
Texas
Wow... Thanks for breaking it down @Kak. That's outrageous. $60,000 of value, what's your return? $6,000...

Not only that... The big issue is that we started with a 20k spread! That is actually pretty great on a 60k order.

It really just shows how ugly tariffs are relative to other taxes. They are arbitrarily slapped on a number in the middle of a supply chain.

Had the landed cost been 50k and expected profits had been 10k... Our effective tax rate would have been 125%... What does that mean for the bigger picture? A voluntary, capitalistic, exchange of value couldn't take place... Only because of the government.

I can show this on video too if it will help understanding.

Holy shit, that's worse than the mob.

When you really think about it... What is the difference?
 
Last edited:

Walter Hay

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
401%
Sep 13, 2014
3,318
13,305
World citizen
@Kak, it's a pity you don't write for CNN. You made it all much clearer than the rather amateurish article linked by the OP. It was obvious that she knew practically nothing about importing.

Walter
 

Kak

Legendary Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
492%
Jan 23, 2011
9,666
47,540
34
Texas
@Kak, it's a pity you don't write for CNN. You made it all much clearer than the rather amateurish article linked by the OP. It was obvious that she knew practically nothing about importing.

Walter

I'd love for CNN to call and give me a show.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

Frank H.

Contributor
Read Fastlane!
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
89%
Dec 22, 2018
90
80
Good posts! I strongly disagree with this policy because North American Manufacturing died 35 years ago, the big companies will still source from their pals in other countries, and the tariffs disproportionally hurt entrepreneurs and small businesses. The first point has been said a billion times, however, I could find sources if needed. Secondly, the big companies will simply network with other countries (Philippines, India, Taiwan) and source from there. Also, there should be a progressive tax on the tariffs, so goods that are worth 25k should have a tariff of 5%, 50k, 10%, 100k, 15% 250k, 25%.

Furthermore, we should put more effort into having stronger bonds with China. We all know they are mediocre with human rights, however, they outnumber us 4-1 and will be an economic powerhouse in 10 - 15 years. My brand makes a lot of risky innovations that the big companies are afraid to make and it is difficult to find manufacturers in North America that will make these risky innovations for a reasonable price. I am looking forward to original and creative counterpoints. If it has been said before, please do not say it.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

AgainstAllOdds

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
647%
Dec 26, 2014
2,274
14,724
32
Chicago, IL
I filmed this video for the forum because I wanted to show an example of where value goes to die. What starts as a pretty lucrative deal becomes....


This is close in numbers to a deal was recently considering. The one thing I have made in China. The tariffs would have popped up during the production process. It would have already been in motion. I would have also had to carry nearly 50 grand of this gross deal for 120 days if everything went smoothly. For 6 grand that I would get to keep. This deal died on timing, the client drug feet on a down payment to the point where I wasn't comfortable with their delivery schedule... I am sure glad that happened.

That 25% doesn't sound like much, but it is HUGE when it is slapped right in the middle of a supply chain. My effective tax rate on this deal would have been 70%.

You get 6 thousand dollars for your hard work and risk.

The government gets 14 thousand because you'll go to jail if you don't.

I just watched your video and had to create my own response.


What your video is missing is the opportunity that was created by these tariffs. Companies that have been better prepared will gain more market share and knockout the competition. This is every entrepreneur's wet dream. The entrepreneurs that know how to source, and are willing to put the work in to create a new supply, are the ones that are going to dominate the market.

The ones that are going to lose are the ones that are scared of change, ignorant, lazy or busy, and stuck in their ways.

On top of that, this tariff is something that everyone could've prepared for. It wasn't out of the blue. Trump has been saying that he'll put taxes on China for at least 8 years now. Here's a video of him from 2011:


These tariffs are a matter of perspective. The perspective I choose is that they're an opportunity. Whether you consider this an opportunity or "extra tax" is up to you.
 

Kak

Legendary Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
492%
Jan 23, 2011
9,666
47,540
34
Texas
I just watched your video and had to create my own response.


What your video is missing is the opportunity that was created by these tariffs. Companies that have been better prepared will gain more market share and knockout the competition. This is every entrepreneur's wet dream. The entrepreneurs that know how to source, and are willing to put the work in to create a new supply, are the ones that are going to dominate the market.

The ones that are going to lose are the ones that are scared of change, ignorant, lazy or busy, and stuck in their ways.

On top of that, this tariff is something that everyone could've prepared for. It wasn't out of the blue. Trump has been saying that he'll put taxes on China for at least 8 years now. Here's a video of him from 2011:


These tariffs are a matter of perspective. The perspective I choose is that they're an opportunity. Whether you consider this an opportunity or "extra tax" is up to you.

You are absolutely 100% correct. They are a matter of perspective. We both have a different angle we are viewing it from, but when I stand by you, I agree 100%.

From a managerial side... Yes, this is a massive opportunity. Yes, our response to tariffs needs to be quick and unfettered. Yes, that is what can shift things up and put different firms in different places.

The smart entrepreneur needs to navigate shit like this, and often times this can be very good for the people that do.

Now, stand over here by me. I have been looking at the policy perspective.

I am NOT a big importer, but I do import from time to time and it sits as a tool in my tool box. I can easily look in other countries. Not a big deal for me, but I would have been pretty pissed off to be caught in a deal like the one in my video, and it could have been worse.

My issue is that not all bigger stable companies have the option to switch crap around. They might have a really great supply chain, a value forward business and are now bending over for this. It may take months for a medium sized company to heal or learn to like the way it feels. That may be fun for the little guy to watch, but we all hope to be the big guy some day. Government punishing business makes me ill.

What is this from my policy sided view? A destruction of value, a very high tax, and a strongly anti-business policy.

We are both right. You are glass half full and I am glass half empty. The opportunity this brings is subsidy so I’m not going to cheer it on.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Last edited:

ZF Lee

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
180%
Jul 27, 2016
2,833
5,097
25
Malaysia
I don't think China will cave.

The beauty of communism is all they have to do is be patient and wait for a new president, either D or R. That will be in 20 months or in 4 years. If they watch American news, they probably think the chances of DJT being reelected is slim and none. So why bother when they can just delay, delay, delay...
They don't really practice Communism, with its open market policy at all.

A bit of history...

When Deng Xiaoping, the strongman who reversed the past disastrous Mao policies took over, he had to convince the Red folks to begin moving closer to capitalistic routes. So, he titled his new philosophy 'socialism with Chinese characters', which simply means in a nutshell socialism adapted to the Chinese problems with their market value system.

But yes, they can delay.
They've got plenty of Asian countries around them to buy and sell stuff without tariff fears.
It's not as if they'd go hungry and impoverished with more US tariffs...

As for reelection, from an outsider's POV, I don't think global affairs are the only thing to determine voter decisions. There's also local affairs and policies that voters think of.

For some reasons, it reminds me to look back in history at Japan, who used to be in China's shoes as a rising Asian power, what with the Russo-Japanese conflicts, Meiji restoration and all...

The optimal strategy in game theory is always tit-for-tat.

At this point we are heading for a trade war.

Remember China is communist, I'm not entirely familiar with china but based off my experience the politics there are very machiavellian.
Yes, machiavellian.

Consider that 50 years ago, the Chinese were fighting a massive civil war that killed MILLIONS. It's not that long ago. Such an event has put in the people a drive to fight for survival every day, even though China is not as battle-torn as it used to be.

That is why here in Malaysia, mainland investors and girls brings a lot of worries, even over handshakes and drinks. You just don't know whether they are friends or cheaters.

Plus, the power of the law is much more enforced in Chinese culture. We have the Confucius call for moral governance and piety on the 'nicer end' of the paradigm, only to be faced off by the legalism of the Shi-Huang Di time. So laws have become tools to play with.


It's negotiation and game theory at its finest.

China wants to wait off closer to the election to figure out whether or not Trump is getting re-elected. Meanwhile Trump is forcing them to make a decision now. Either they take the deal that he's offering, or they risk being screwed for 5 more years assuming he wins in 2020.

Personally, I'm 100% behind the tariffs. China will cave before the U.S. (Trump) does.


An individual whose opinion I admire on the topic is Marty Davis from Cambria. Essentially, his main point is like all economists, that economics supports free trade. However, you cannot have free trade without fair trade (lack of subsidies, excess of government loans, free electricity, currency manipulation, etc.).

What Trump is doing is enforcing fair trade in order to allow for free trade. Tariffs are an enforcement tool, and Trump is using it as such.

These tariffs are really low risk, really high reward in terms of getting China to do what the U.S. wants.

I really had high hopes that the US-China talks would reach some kind of agreement.

Some of my Chinese relatives have been sounding rather anti-American in the last Chinese New Year reunion, and this makes me ill, considering you guys aren't a bad bunch! :(
 

AgainstAllOdds

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Fastlane!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
647%
Dec 26, 2014
2,274
14,724
32
Chicago, IL
I really had high hopes that the US-China talks would reach some kind of agreement.

Some of my Chinese relatives have been sounding rather anti-American in the last Chinese New Year reunion, and this makes me ill, considering you guys aren't a bad bunch! :(

You realize this news is amazing for countries like yours (Malaysia), right?

The longer a trade-war goes on between the U.S. and China, the more countries south of China benefit. New Chinese factories, investment, etc. Meanwhile whichever factories you have in the region competing against China can be more competitive.
 

ZF Lee

Legendary Contributor
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Rat-Race Escape!
Read Fastlane!
Read Unscripted!
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
180%
Jul 27, 2016
2,833
5,097
25
Malaysia
You realize this news is amazing for countries like yours (Malaysia), right?

The longer a trade-war goes on between the U.S. and China, the more countries south of China benefit. New Chinese factories, investment, etc. Meanwhile whichever factories you have in the region competing against China can be more competitive.
Yes, of course.

That's why I'm not as worried of doing business locally, as before.
We've been always been on the sidelines, when it comes to choosing which world power to support.

I just hope the US-China conflict doesn't lead up to an actual armed conflict that endangers world peace.
 
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum: Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.

James Fake

Gold Contributor
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
150%
May 4, 2009
1,494
2,244
Las Vegas, NV
At the end of the day; no matter what party or perspective.. this hurts everybody.

But most importantly, the brunt of it WILL fall on consumers,.. which is just another small invisible dot that lines up to a bigger picture... a reset.. aka a global recession. Things way out of balance, innovation stalled from reaching the ceiling of current tech infrastructure, etc etc.

It's inevitable..
And I'm just sitting here patiently waiting licking my chops!
 
Last edited:

biophase

Legendary Contributor
FASTLANE INSIDER
EPIC CONTRIBUTOR
Read Unscripted!
Summit Attendee
Speedway Pass
User Power
Value/Post Ratio
474%
Jul 25, 2007
9,112
43,229
Scottsdale, AZ
I just watched your video and had to create my own response.


What your video is missing is the opportunity that was created by these tariffs. Companies that have been better prepared will gain more market share and knockout the competition. This is every entrepreneur's wet dream. The entrepreneurs that know how to source, and are willing to put the work in to create a new supply, are the ones that are going to dominate the market.

The ones that are going to lose are the ones that are scared of change, ignorant, lazy or busy, and stuck in their ways.

On top of that, this tariff is something that everyone could've prepared for. It wasn't out of the blue. Trump has been saying that he'll put taxes on China for at least 8 years now. Here's a video of him from 2011:


These tariffs are a matter of perspective. The perspective I choose is that they're an opportunity. Whether you consider this an opportunity or "extra tax" is up to you.

Your video doesn’t make any sense to me. Basically you are saying just import from another company that is cheaper. Well you can do this whether or not there is or is not a tariff on China as a competitive advantage.

We can all play the manufacture in a different country game. What if instead of the tariff of being a country specific tariff it becomes a product specific tariff. So you’re specific widget is taxed at 25% no matter what country it is made. Then Kak’s video applies and the product price goes up.

Personally I’m staying with China. I’ve got a good setup there and can wait this out.
 

Post New Topic

Please SEARCH before posting.
Please select the BEST category.

Post new topic

Guest post submissions offered HERE.

New Topics

Fastlane Insiders

View the forum AD FREE.
Private, unindexed content
Detailed process/execution threads
Ideas needing execution, more!

Join Fastlane Insiders.

Top