OFF-TOPIC Give me 30 Seconds, I Need Your Help

[Vigilante]

I have a one question poll that I need about 200 people to respond to. Thanks...Vigilante

No registration required.

If there were two products that were similar, and one was called SHARE and the other was called SHAREGIVER would you assume the company w...

 

Don't like ads? Remove them while supporting the forum. Subscribe.

[MJ DeMarco]

Doesn't matter what we think, it matters what the lawyers think.

Voted.

 

[RazorCut]

I had the same thought as MJ.

Hope it’s not a major bind for you buddy.

Voted

 

[Kruiser]

Hmm. Sounds like a "likelihood of consumer confusion" poll. Hope you aren't in trademark litigation.

 

[Vigilante]

Pre-emptive. Thread closed, poll closed, but thanks to all.

 

[Vigilante]

Doesn't matter what we think, it matters what the lawyers think.

Voted.

BTW on a macro scale, it does matter but only at a certain point down the road that most similar questions will never get to. One way ambiguity is decided, believe it or not, is through a much larger scale poll but this small sampling gave me the empirical data that I needed. Opposite of confirmation bias. I also found that web site a GREAT WAY to get a quick pulse/poll. For those tracking with the thought process, you need about an 80% "no confusion" vote on a larger scale to make a case for no likelihood of confusion.

So thanks ALL.