Let's open the flood gates. Let's think big.
I feel many people think of blogging as, "Let me throw some words on a page once a day/week and throw it on my social and make some money!"
These are the people who won't make it very far.
This type of thinking is equivalent to, "Let me buy a single story home and rent it out and make some money!"
There's nothing wrong with either statement, because both are true: they can both make money. But there's little thought in scale or magnitude.
--------------------------------------------
Speaking to magnitude, we need to look at how much you can earn per visitor, and how many of those visitors we can attract (don't mistake this as scale, because it's somewhat separate here, though it becomes scale once the full pipeline is created). This will give us:
So let's start with a site pulling in 10,000 visitors a month off organic search from content you've written. (You did remember to bring the audience in first, right?)
Here are some monetization methods you might be able to expect:
Assuming you're this far, and there's no way to suck out another dollar from your visitors, you only have two ways to grow (scale) now:
@csalvato was on the right track, where you could begin to add sites. This is fine, but now we're making our money from lots of sites, and lots of sites means more costs, more time (create and monitor), and more content.
@RHL was right in pointing out how aggregators make their bucks on scale, though there are ways to scale your own blog just like the big guys (and not have to pay for it either).
So, what are we left with?
When you got to the store to buy milk, how many of you come out of the store with something else? How many of you swoop by another aisle to check if your favorite item is on sale, or favorite beer in stock, or whatever? Probably a good portion.
Well, let's give our users more eye candy.
Enter:
This is scaling (when talking about value per visitor, remember) what users are worth. You reached the highest magnitude possible at $0.05 per visitor in one channel, so by creating multiple channels, you're now scaling your bottom line on the same number of visitors (instead of adding whole new sites).
Make sense?
Let's say out of your 10,000 users, 100 of them were making you money (1%) conversion through your written content. Well, now, maybe another 1% make you money through your Podcasts, another 1% make you money through your book, and another 1% make you money through YouTube adverts/views. Maybe each one doesn't offer up the same magnitude, but either way, you're pulling in another dollar on the same user count.
You're scaling the value of a visitor through channels, not through "driving traffic" or adding sites or growing social or anything else.
This is not any different than what car manufacturers do. Ford has one brand: Ford. But they have lots and lots of makes/models/upgrades to offer. Not everyone wants an F-150. Not everyone wants an Explorer. Not everyone wants a Taurus. But, by adding all these different styles of cars under one brand, they're taking advantage of giving their customers options. Assuming they had consistent traffic to their lots, they'll close more deals by having more to offer.
Give your audience every possible option, all in one place. A blog is written content, infographics, videos, podcasts, etc. It's every type of media. Open your mind to more than writing words on a page.
Oh, and once you've maximized your magnitude (value of a visitor), now you can go back to the traditional scale by making your 10k visitors 100k+. Now you're really growing.
Now, the impact of scaling each additional visitor is 3-5x more valuable to you, and suddenly the best use of your time is adding visitors, not content.
I feel many people think of blogging as, "Let me throw some words on a page once a day/week and throw it on my social and make some money!"
These are the people who won't make it very far.
This type of thinking is equivalent to, "Let me buy a single story home and rent it out and make some money!"
There's nothing wrong with either statement, because both are true: they can both make money. But there's little thought in scale or magnitude.
--------------------------------------------
Elements of Scale and Magnitude: Blogging Edition
Speaking to magnitude, we need to look at how much you can earn per visitor, and how many of those visitors we can attract (don't mistake this as scale, because it's somewhat separate here, though it becomes scale once the full pipeline is created). This will give us:
Value of Visitor x Number of Visitors = Magnitude of Monetization
The reason number of visitors here isn't (in my mind) considered scale, is because for this little exercise, we're just going to look at how the blog is monetized. When we start adding different types of monetization... then we're talking scale. But more on that in a moment.
So let's start with a site pulling in 10,000 visitors a month off organic search from content you've written. (You did remember to bring the audience in first, right?)
Here are some monetization methods you might be able to expect:
- You can throw on Adsense and let Gorg attempt to make you money by giving your users ads to click on.
- You can attempt to collect data in the form of Leads and find a buyer/business for them.
- You can add in affiliate links in hopes users will click them and go make a purchase somewhere else, making you commissions.
- You can import/create your own products which uniquely fit your audience.
- You can sell all your ad space to a single buyer who will pay you a steady amount based on traffic/clicks.
- You can lease your site to other vendors who throw in their own monetization to, hopefully, use your traffic to earn more than they're paying you.
- Test all of them to find out which makes you the greatest net income (not to be confused with rev, since the different methods have different ways to create a dollar)
- Use more than one method to monetize (though, usually, adding in another will cannibalize the others in some fashion)
Value of Visitor x 10,000 = $500
The value of a visitor is [up to] $0.05, and your best method of monetization is worth $500 (magnitude). Remember, this is per visitor. Why is this important?
Assuming you're this far, and there's no way to suck out another dollar from your visitors, you only have two ways to grow (scale) now:
- More visitors (which we're keeping at 10,000 per month, for now)
- Find another way to make more money from these visitors
@csalvato was on the right track, where you could begin to add sites. This is fine, but now we're making our money from lots of sites, and lots of sites means more costs, more time (create and monitor), and more content.
@RHL was right in pointing out how aggregators make their bucks on scale, though there are ways to scale your own blog just like the big guys (and not have to pay for it either).
So, what are we left with?
When you got to the store to buy milk, how many of you come out of the store with something else? How many of you swoop by another aisle to check if your favorite item is on sale, or favorite beer in stock, or whatever? Probably a good portion.
Well, let's give our users more eye candy.
Enter:
- Podcasts
- eBooks/Books
- YouTube
- etc.
- Get your users to stick around longer and/or do more things (buy more, click more, watch adverts, etc.)
- Ger your users to become repeat buyers/visitors
- Appeal to a wider user base
This is scaling (when talking about value per visitor, remember) what users are worth. You reached the highest magnitude possible at $0.05 per visitor in one channel, so by creating multiple channels, you're now scaling your bottom line on the same number of visitors (instead of adding whole new sites).
Make sense?
Let's say out of your 10,000 users, 100 of them were making you money (1%) conversion through your written content. Well, now, maybe another 1% make you money through your Podcasts, another 1% make you money through your book, and another 1% make you money through YouTube adverts/views. Maybe each one doesn't offer up the same magnitude, but either way, you're pulling in another dollar on the same user count.
You're scaling the value of a visitor through channels, not through "driving traffic" or adding sites or growing social or anything else.
This is not any different than what car manufacturers do. Ford has one brand: Ford. But they have lots and lots of makes/models/upgrades to offer. Not everyone wants an F-150. Not everyone wants an Explorer. Not everyone wants a Taurus. But, by adding all these different styles of cars under one brand, they're taking advantage of giving their customers options. Assuming they had consistent traffic to their lots, they'll close more deals by having more to offer.
Give your audience every possible option, all in one place. A blog is written content, infographics, videos, podcasts, etc. It's every type of media. Open your mind to more than writing words on a page.
Oh, and once you've maximized your magnitude (value of a visitor), now you can go back to the traditional scale by making your 10k visitors 100k+. Now you're really growing.
Now, the impact of scaling each additional visitor is 3-5x more valuable to you, and suddenly the best use of your time is adding visitors, not content.
Last edited: