User Power
Value/Post Ratio
19%
- Oct 4, 2007
- 1,385
- 265
A couple months ago I created this thread asking about different methods and services people recommend for indexing backlinks and since I got several good responses, I thought I'd create a mini case study to see which indexing method really works the best.
For this case study I'm going to be using Senukex to build the links. This will consist of having original articles created (500+ words each), spinning them with The Best Spinner (to at least ~30% uniqueness), then submitting to senukex's list of web2.0 properties and article directories and also creating profile links on both web2.0 sites and forums.
When I manually create campaign projects in senukex (as I will do with this test) I typically get the following results:
Web2.0 property links (social sites) - 30
Article directory links - 20
Web2.0 profile links - 20
Forum profile links - 140
= 210 links per campaign project
However, I believe a larger sample size than 210 links is needed to make a judgement on which indexing method is the best, so I will create 3 campaign projects for each method, for a total of 630 backlinks. I believe that should be a large enough sample size to pull data from.
I plan on testing 6 different methods with this case study to see which produces the best indexing results.
Method 1 - Control group. Google will have to find these links on its own.
Method 2 - Backlinks energizer
Method 3 - Pinging the links via Scrapebox's rapid indexer addon
Method 4 - Bookmarking the links with Bookmarking Demon
Method 5 - Scrapebox - 31,500 url auto approve blog comments (50 blog comments per link)
Method 6 - Linklicious basic account (creating rss feeds out of the links and pinging until crawled)
I plan to provide the results of indexing at increments of 24hrs, 48hrs, 72hrs, 96hrs, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks. At the end of the 4 weeks, we'll determine a winner based on the percentage of links indexed.
If you have any suggestions for the case study, please let me know before I begin the test. I plan to begin the case study in a few days, have to give my writers a few days to create the articles and get everything set up.
For this case study I'm going to be using Senukex to build the links. This will consist of having original articles created (500+ words each), spinning them with The Best Spinner (to at least ~30% uniqueness), then submitting to senukex's list of web2.0 properties and article directories and also creating profile links on both web2.0 sites and forums.
When I manually create campaign projects in senukex (as I will do with this test) I typically get the following results:
Web2.0 property links (social sites) - 30
Article directory links - 20
Web2.0 profile links - 20
Forum profile links - 140
= 210 links per campaign project
However, I believe a larger sample size than 210 links is needed to make a judgement on which indexing method is the best, so I will create 3 campaign projects for each method, for a total of 630 backlinks. I believe that should be a large enough sample size to pull data from.
I plan on testing 6 different methods with this case study to see which produces the best indexing results.
Method 1 - Control group. Google will have to find these links on its own.
Method 2 - Backlinks energizer
Method 3 - Pinging the links via Scrapebox's rapid indexer addon
Method 4 - Bookmarking the links with Bookmarking Demon
Method 5 - Scrapebox - 31,500 url auto approve blog comments (50 blog comments per link)
Method 6 - Linklicious basic account (creating rss feeds out of the links and pinging until crawled)
I plan to provide the results of indexing at increments of 24hrs, 48hrs, 72hrs, 96hrs, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks. At the end of the 4 weeks, we'll determine a winner based on the percentage of links indexed.
If you have any suggestions for the case study, please let me know before I begin the test. I plan to begin the case study in a few days, have to give my writers a few days to create the articles and get everything set up.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.
Last edited by a moderator: