Thread: Backlink Indexing Case Study

I've seen similar results for myself using BLE but now I have too many backlinks to index on a daily basis to make that practical. I'm thinking of trying out backlinksindexer.com after reading about the case study here about profile links: Backlinks Indexer Review – Profile Links Case Study

Would love to see this test. I'd probably include linklicious and lindexed too

oh, good point. Maybe try Nuclear Link Indexer and Xindexer to see how they compare.

I was thinking you should probably include BacklinkBooster in your study also. Any word on when you will start this?

Still plan on doing this next case study mate? Let me know if I can help at all because I'm interested to know also.

its very good for all of us..thank to you for performing this test..hope you will share all results in better shape so that every one can get befit from it, for me it is also a annoying challenge that how can we boost indexing..as i am running few blogs..some of my post got indexed just after 5 mins of posting(without bookmarking or using any other tool to boost) while on same blog next post may take time to 24 to 48 hours(some time even more) even if i do bookmarking for them..

I'm trying some similar things but I decided to try backlinksindexer, nuclear link indexer and xindexer. My data is all on paper so I'd probably need to organize it better but right now I'm getting about a 76% index rate with backlinksindexer.com, about 41% index rate with nuclear link indexer and about 38% with xindexer. My backlink energizer is getting around 37% but the only downside there is I can only get so many of my links processed per day so it's kinda slow.

P.S. I started on March 9th so today is 2 weeks

Originally Posted by kwerner

Just an update on this thread...

I've been outsourcing the forum profile backlinks on Fiverr like I mentioned previously; building about 10,000 every other week to my 2nd and 3rd Tier links, then running them through BLE (with settings on 5 links per post, 12 posts per day).

I've got about 80,000 backlogged, which means it's going to take forever for BLE to process them, that's why I'm now only making 10,000 every other week.

But I'm getting about a 34% indexation rate of the forum profiles, so although it's slow, it seems to be working pretty good. =)

Originally Posted by kwerner

Been testing the BLE plugin for the last week or two. Should be ready for the case study.

But I'm wondering if there is enough interest here on the forum to proceed with the test or not? Only 2 people have mentioned that they were looking forward to the results.

If there's not enough interest, that's understandable, I realize there's not a whole lot of SEO interest / topics here. But if you are interested, let me know and I'll either share the results in this thread or PM you.

I for one am interested

Out of all the solutions you presented, you have left out the most effective indexing solutions.

I use to use scrapebox but after the last Panda, scrapebox has been having a hard time with indexing 2.0s, especially the garbage senuke creates.

Nuclear Link Indexer and Backlinkindexer are the 2 and really only solutions to indexing your backlinks Guaranteed. I am creating a custom 2.0 bot and a bookmarking bot which will most likely be more cost effecient then both of these

Originally Posted by kwerner

This test was specifically for indexing Forum Profiles, not Web 2.0's. If people can't get their Web 2.0s indexed, they're doing something wrong IMO, because those are the easiest types of links to get indexed.



A few other people mentioned these services, but IMO the cost isn't justifiable; especially for indexing forum profiles.

Well, good luck trying to index forum profiles. Pretty much a waste of time in my opinion unless you add tons of content to the profile.

To each their own

Originally Posted by kwerner

I think you might be missing the point...

Forum profiles are very difficult to index, everyone knows this. Therefore, I was looking for a simple, cost effective, solution to increase the indexation rate of these notoriously difficult links, mainly for efficiency.

Now, another takeaway from this test is that if a tool is good enough to index forum profiles, how good of job would it do at indexing other (easier) types of links, such as web 2.0's, like you mentioned?

I see your point but 2.0s should not be a problem indexing. Depending on how your spinning your articles and what 2.0 sites your using and how many you are creating.

For me, I have my own bots which will be creating 1,000s a day. So indexing them will be a bitch only because I have so many first tiers and I have to build backlinks at a 3 to 1 ratio. Build more tiers and thats all the indexing I need.

Remember you must have unique titles as well. I use ubertoolz which will create 500 spun titles at a time.

Originally Posted by kwerner

Okay, *now* I understand why you'd want to use Nuclear Link Indexer / Backlink Indexer to help get your web2.0's indexed. If you're creating that many it's totally understandable and probably a cost effective solution. I take it you're using Ubot or Zenno to create your web2.0's?

Yeah, I use Ubertoolz as well, the Ubercubez module is pretty badass; it really took me a while to figure it out though, wasted a lot of time creating my Ubercube the wrong way, haha. You must be using the Premium membership, I'm just doing the Standard so I only get 100 title variations, but it's no biggie.

Thanks for the clarification on what you're using NLI and BI for, makes total sense now. =)

Rep++

I tried zenno but I had a hard time getting a hang of it so yeah Im using ubot right now.

Cool man thanks Are you a member over at blackhatworld by the way?