Get Updates (It's FREE)

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 64

Thread: Backlink Indexing Case Study

  1. #41
    (15) Kia
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thx'd 3 times in 3 Posts

    Default

    I've seen similar results for myself using BLE but now I have too many backlinks to index on a daily basis to make that practical. I'm thinking of trying out backlinksindexer.com after reading about the case study here about profile links: Backlinks Indexer Review – Profile Links Case Study

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to mrsandman For This Useful Post:

    kwerner (Feb 15th, 2012)

  3. #42
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrsandman View Post
    I've seen similar results for myself using BLE but now I have too many backlinks to index on a daily basis to make that practical.
    I too am now in this predicament. Had a guy on Fiverr create 20,000 forum profile links and now I realize that running them through BLE would literally take years to process. Doh! Guess I should have planned ahead for this, huh?

    So now it looks as though I need to test out some services that can process tens of thousands of links per month.

    Anyone have suggestions for this?

    Maybe I'll run a test of Backlinks Indexer, Bookmarking Demon, Scrapebox, and a few others.
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  4. #43
    (15) Kia
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thx'd 3 times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Would love to see this test. I'd probably include linklicious and lindexed too

  5. #44
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrsandman View Post
    Would love to see this test. I'd probably include linklicious and lindexed too
    I included linklicious in the previous test and it was one of the worst performers (even the control group performed better), so I wouldn't be inclined to add it to the new test. And I believe lindexed pretty much uses the same method as linklicious to crawl / index links, so I'm not sure that it would make sense to try it either.
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  6. #45
    (15) Kia
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thx'd 3 times in 3 Posts

    Default

    oh, good point. Maybe try Nuclear Link Indexer and Xindexer to see how they compare.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to mrsandman For This Useful Post:

    kwerner (Feb 18th, 2012)

  8. #46
    (15) Kia
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thx'd 3 times in 3 Posts

    Default

    I was thinking you should probably include BacklinkBooster in your study also. Any word on when you will start this?

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to mrsandman For This Useful Post:

    kwerner (Feb 28th, 2012)

  10. #47
    (15) Kia
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thx'd 3 times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Still plan on doing this next case study mate? Let me know if I can help at all because I'm interested to know also.

  11. #48
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrsandman View Post
    Still plan on doing this next case study mate? Let me know if I can help at all because I'm interested to know also.
    Yeah, I haven't decided if I'm going to do it or not.

    I feel like the services that charge the monthly fee for this stuff aren't nearly providing enough value to justify the cost.

    For example, one of the services charges $99 a month to process 15,000 urls. That's fucking ridiculous for indexing forum profiles! I have WAY more than 15,000 forum profiles to process every month. The cost simply outweighs the benefit received.

    As a matter of fact, I have yet to see a case study that proves that indexing your forum profiles using one of these services actually results in better serp movement than having google find them on its own.

    And the end result that we all want to see is better serp movement, not just indexation. That $99 a month people are spending on these types of services could be put to FAR better uses that would produce much greater, proven, serp results.

    That's why I'm hesitant to continue the case study.
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  12. #49
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Just an update on this thread...

    I've been outsourcing the forum profile backlinks on Fiverr like I mentioned previously; building about 10,000 every other week to my 2nd and 3rd Tier links, then running them through BLE (with settings on 5 links per post, 12 posts per day).

    I've got about 80,000 backlogged, which means it's going to take forever for BLE to process them, that's why I'm now only making 10,000 every other week.

    But I'm getting about a 34% indexation rate of the forum profiles, so although it's slow, it seems to be working pretty good. =)
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  13. #50
    (13) Pontiac
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    0
    Thx'd 4 times in 4 Posts

    Default

    its very good for all of us..thank to you for performing this test..hope you will share all results in better shape so that every one can get befit from it, for me it is also a annoying challenge that how can we boost indexing..as i am running few blogs..some of my post got indexed just after 5 mins of posting(without bookmarking or using any other tool to boost) while on same blog next post may take time to 24 to 48 hours(some time even more) even if i do bookmarking for them..

  14. #51
    (15) Kia
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thx'd 3 times in 3 Posts

    Default

    I'm trying some similar things but I decided to try backlinksindexer, nuclear link indexer and xindexer. My data is all on paper so I'd probably need to organize it better but right now I'm getting about a 76% index rate with backlinksindexer.com, about 41% index rate with nuclear link indexer and about 38% with xindexer. My backlink energizer is getting around 37% but the only downside there is I can only get so many of my links processed per day so it's kinda slow.

    P.S. I started on March 9th so today is 2 weeks


    Quote Originally Posted by kwerner View Post
    Just an update on this thread...

    I've been outsourcing the forum profile backlinks on Fiverr like I mentioned previously; building about 10,000 every other week to my 2nd and 3rd Tier links, then running them through BLE (with settings on 5 links per post, 12 posts per day).

    I've got about 80,000 backlogged, which means it's going to take forever for BLE to process them, that's why I'm now only making 10,000 every other week.

    But I'm getting about a 34% indexation rate of the forum profiles, so although it's slow, it seems to be working pretty good. =)

  15. #52
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Sounds like great results, but are these links only forum profiles or a mixture of different link types?

    Thx.
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  16. #53
    (9) Cadillac Yussef's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Age
    41
    Posts
    177
    Thanks
    50
    Thx'd 36 times in 20 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwerner View Post
    Been testing the BLE plugin for the last week or two. Should be ready for the case study.

    But I'm wondering if there is enough interest here on the forum to proceed with the test or not? Only 2 people have mentioned that they were looking forward to the results.

    If there's not enough interest, that's understandable, I realize there's not a whole lot of SEO interest / topics here. But if you are interested, let me know and I'll either share the results in this thread or PM you.
    I for one am interested

  17. #54
    (12) Chevrolet Dan Da Man's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Locale
    San Diego
    Age
    26
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    21
    Thx'd 12 times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Out of all the solutions you presented, you have left out the most effective indexing solutions.

    I use to use scrapebox but after the last Panda, scrapebox has been having a hard time with indexing 2.0s, especially the garbage senuke creates.

    Nuclear Link Indexer and Backlinkindexer are the 2 and really only solutions to indexing your backlinks Guaranteed. I am creating a custom 2.0 bot and a bookmarking bot which will most likely be more cost effecient then both of these

  18. #55
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Seo Man Dan View Post
    I use to use scrapebox but after the last Panda, scrapebox has been having a hard time with indexing 2.0s, especially the garbage senuke creates.
    This test was specifically for indexing Forum Profiles, not Web 2.0's. If people can't get their Web 2.0s indexed, they're doing something wrong IMO, because those are the easiest types of links to get indexed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Seo Man Dan View Post
    Nuclear Link Indexer and Backlinkindexer are the 2 and really only solutions to indexing your backlinks Guaranteed.
    A few other people mentioned these services, but IMO the cost isn't justifiable; especially for indexing forum profiles.
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  19. #56
    (12) Chevrolet Dan Da Man's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Locale
    San Diego
    Age
    26
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    21
    Thx'd 12 times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwerner View Post
    This test was specifically for indexing Forum Profiles, not Web 2.0's. If people can't get their Web 2.0s indexed, they're doing something wrong IMO, because those are the easiest types of links to get indexed.



    A few other people mentioned these services, but IMO the cost isn't justifiable; especially for indexing forum profiles.
    Well, good luck trying to index forum profiles. Pretty much a waste of time in my opinion unless you add tons of content to the profile.

    To each their own

  20. #57
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Seo Man Dan View Post
    Well, good luck trying to index forum profiles. Pretty much a waste of time in my opinion unless you add tons of content to the profile.

    To each their own
    I think you might be missing the point...

    Forum profiles are very difficult to index, everyone knows this. Therefore, I was looking for a simple, cost effective, solution to increase the indexation rate of these notoriously difficult links, mainly for efficiency.

    Now, another takeaway from this test is that if a tool is good enough to index forum profiles, how good of job would it do at indexing other (easier) types of links, such as web 2.0's, like you mentioned?
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  21. #58
    (12) Chevrolet Dan Da Man's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Locale
    San Diego
    Age
    26
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    21
    Thx'd 12 times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwerner View Post
    I think you might be missing the point...

    Forum profiles are very difficult to index, everyone knows this. Therefore, I was looking for a simple, cost effective, solution to increase the indexation rate of these notoriously difficult links, mainly for efficiency.

    Now, another takeaway from this test is that if a tool is good enough to index forum profiles, how good of job would it do at indexing other (easier) types of links, such as web 2.0's, like you mentioned?
    I see your point but 2.0s should not be a problem indexing. Depending on how your spinning your articles and what 2.0 sites your using and how many you are creating.

    For me, I have my own bots which will be creating 1,000s a day. So indexing them will be a bitch only because I have so many first tiers and I have to build backlinks at a 3 to 1 ratio. Build more tiers and thats all the indexing I need.

    Remember you must have unique titles as well. I use ubertoolz which will create 500 spun titles at a time.

  22. #59
    (3) Lamborghini kwerner's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2007
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanks
    2,543
    Thx'd 643 times in 397 Posts

    Default

    Okay, *now* I understand why you'd want to use Nuclear Link Indexer / Backlink Indexer to help get your web2.0's indexed. If you're creating that many it's totally understandable and probably a cost effective solution. I take it you're using Ubot or Zenno to create your web2.0's?

    Yeah, I use Ubertoolz as well, the Ubercubez module is pretty badass; it really took me a while to figure it out though, wasted a lot of time creating my Ubercube the wrong way, haha. You must be using the Premium membership, I'm just doing the Standard so I only get 100 title variations, but it's no biggie.

    Thanks for the clarification on what you're using NLI and BI for, makes total sense now. =)

    Rep++
    "If you want to be rich, add VALUE to people's lives."
    - Brian Sher

  23. #60
    (12) Chevrolet Dan Da Man's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Locale
    San Diego
    Age
    26
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    21
    Thx'd 12 times in 9 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwerner View Post
    Okay, *now* I understand why you'd want to use Nuclear Link Indexer / Backlink Indexer to help get your web2.0's indexed. If you're creating that many it's totally understandable and probably a cost effective solution. I take it you're using Ubot or Zenno to create your web2.0's?

    Yeah, I use Ubertoolz as well, the Ubercubez module is pretty badass; it really took me a while to figure it out though, wasted a lot of time creating my Ubercube the wrong way, haha. You must be using the Premium membership, I'm just doing the Standard so I only get 100 title variations, but it's no biggie.

    Thanks for the clarification on what you're using NLI and BI for, makes total sense now. =)

    Rep++
    I tried zenno but I had a hard time getting a hang of it so yeah Im using ubot right now.

    Cool man thanks Are you a member over at blackhatworld by the way?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What to do with $3,000- a new case study.
    By kurtyordy in forum Web Businesses/Internet Marketing
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: Dec 26th, 2011, 07:49 PM
  2. Best Methods / Services for Indexing Backlinks?
    By kwerner in forum Web Businesses/Internet Marketing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Nov 27th, 2011, 01:58 PM
  3. Case Study - From page 8 to page 1 on Google
    By andviv in forum Web Businesses/Internet Marketing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep 7th, 2010, 05:57 PM
  4. Squeeze page case study
    By mtnman in forum Web Businesses/Internet Marketing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Feb 12th, 2009, 08:49 PM
  5. A Priceless Case Study in EP
    By MJDeMarco in forum General Business Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Oct 20th, 2007, 10:54 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •